Search options (Page 9 of 10)

@adam_w
Which driver do you use?
Do you use a ThinkPad driver?
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site. … MIGR-62909

@abdou
You may change to AHCI, if you prepared running windows.

Another question:
Did you enable 'DriverPack MassStorage text mode at DriverPacks BASE ?

@Hectorfx

Be aware, I've no appropiate hardware to test.
I'm guessing. This may work or be nonsense.

Idea was

[V2]
ms_1_deviceName="VIA ATA/ATAPI HOST CONTROLLER"
...
ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k,wxp,w2k3"

[V3]
ms_1_deviceName="VIA SATA/PATA IDE"
...
ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k,wxp,w2k3"

[V4]
ms_1_deviceName="VIA HYPERION SATA IDE"
...
ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k,wxp,w2k3"

For testing purposes, use driverpacks massstorage drivers only.
Do NOT add own massstorage drivers. They may interfere, results maybe confusing.

PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C3 remids to a ICH7R.

http://download.intel.com/support/mothe … ps_1_1.pdf
There is a  Intel  82801GR (ICH7R) mentioned, no addional massstorage controller.

This describes a 'Embedded SATA Software RAID for ICH7R'
http://manuals.fujitsu-siemens.com/serv … a-raid.pdf

Therefore a PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C3&SUBSYS_348F8086 use ICH7R hardware and LSI drivers.

Does a iastor.sys conflict exist?

DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_8022nightly_bartPEtest.7z :
"txtsetup.sif","HardWareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27c3&SUBSYS_348F8086", """MegaINTL"""
sil 3132:
"txtsetup.sif","HardWareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_1095&DEV_3132&SUBSYS_71321095", """3132R5C"""

Already integrated driver should work.
Try current test release. Again, do NOT add own massstorage drivers.

Do you use XP source files? Try 2003 source files too.

Acutally a SiI3132 example, but there is a full Hardware ID list.
As known Silicon Image offers different firmware files.
http://www.siliconimage.com/support/ind … cid=3&

catdog6 flashed different firmware and deliverd full HardwareList
http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php? … p;p=142234

This HardwareID classify different firmware at this example:
PCI\VEN_1095&DEV_3132&CC_0180 : B7405
PCI\VEN_1095&DEV_3132&CC_0104 : R7405

Can this be used at PCI\VEN_1095&DEV_3112&CC_0104 and PCI\VEN_1095&DEV_3132&CC_0180 too?

What about enhancing 'HWID Tool'? Store 'devcon.exe hwids "PCI\CC_01*"' too?
Some driver inf files use CC_01*.
Knowing full Hardware ID list may get clearer results.
In addition there maybe new solutions possible in future. e.g. use REV_*

I've seen PCI\VEN_*&DEV_*&CC_01* at driver inf files.

Which driver file use PCI\VEN_*&DEV_*&SUBSYS_*&CC_01* ?

What about CC_0104 in S5?

I doubt that's a valid PNP ID: PCI\VEN_1095&DEV_3112&SUBSYS_*&CC_0104

Generally Net drivers does work at PE.
Of course there are exeptions. Some Net drivers behave different.

I know so far:

Broadcom NetXtreme II
http://www.broadcom.com/support/etherne … remeii.php
This driver use a Virtual Bus Device architecture.
D\L\B4: There are two inf and sys files for one nic device.
This driver dosn't work at RIS.
Maybe this could work at PE, a special plugin would be required.

Broadcom recommends the RIS driver for a Windows Preinstallation Environment.
There is one inf and sys files for one nic device.
PE community use this RIS driver.

Another major pain is nforce. There are a lot of driver versions.
And there are two inf and sys files for one nic device.

Nvidia dosn't offer RIS drivers to a end customer.
Some OEM offers nforce RIS drivers.
There is a pdf included: Nvidia recommend a RIS Driver for WinPE.
This RIS Driver is NOT recommended for normal windows.

http://support.fujitsu-siemens.com/Down … 5DCE8A753F
nForce Family Network Driver  Date: 05.10.2006   Version:    65.3.4 RIS_PE

There are drivers 67.5.3 from 2007:
ftp://ftp.asus.com.tw/pub/ASUS/misc/uti … S_6753.zip

Some other exceptions:
Attensic use a strange subfolder: system32\Attansic\L1\atcInst.dll
http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php? … p;p=122098

D-Link DGE-530T is similar: system32\wbem\mof\gewmi.mof
http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php? … mp;p=87509

Unfortunately I don't have acess to above mentioned hardware.
I've to guess from user experiences.

Thanks for nvidia version compare.
It's not strange, it's nvidia

Sorry I'm not convinced yet.
A search *.inf and *.ini dosn't match PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_044C&CC_0104 and not PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_044D&CC_0106.
Does DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_7108X.7z support this two devices?

About Silicon image SUBSYS_*CC_010* tagging:
I'm guessing only, because I don't have this hardware.
Based on devcon output, I would remove CC_010* tagging.

Thanks, driverINfinfo spotlight tool is great. This come in handy.

Unfortunalely I have limited different hardware.

What about: http://www.nvidia.com/object/nforce_520 … 12.15.html
nForce 520/560 
Version:    12.15
Release Date:    July 24, 2007

Strange, XP should support this graphic card out of the box.

Does your XP CD contain files sgiu.inf, sgiulnt5.sys and sgiul50.dll?
Based on HardwareID, these three files should support your graphic card.

Cat file is missing in Intel Embedded drivers. Intel didn't include Embedded cat file.

R79733.EXE does not contain embedded drivers.

Try last test package, but remove Intel Embedded drivers.
Does graphics drivers load at Dell GX260,GX270 and GX280?

Added:

Idea:
Dell edited file ialmnt5.inf, SUBSYS was added: PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_*&SUBSYS_*
However there is a old Intel default *.cat tile included. This cat file is invalid to the edited Dell ialmnt5.inf.
Therefore rank 0xc001.
However according to *.cat file date, Dell may have added a Dell *.cat file too.
How to recognice a *.cat distributer.