Search options (Page 151 of 159)

Is that because of your internet connection?  Or your FTP software?
I use FreeFTP (http://www.brandyware.com/freeftp.htm) and apart from the limited interface, it works just fine.  It's free, and comes in 10 languages, and the best part is there's no crapware (toolbars, widgets, etc.).

Jaak will have to answer that one.  I was not involved in the Intel troubleshooting.

Bump,
First post updated.
Link Disabled for 7.09 release.
MD5: E836F95D5A102525C7E555DCCCD9F5E4
Size: 52.5 MB

Changelog:
-.INI
  Updated .ini to include new ATICCC/ATICCP install method. (mr_smartepants)
  Deleted [A-2] section, duplicated in Graphics_C DP (mr_smartepants)
-G\A\5\ Optimized and validated .inf code line-by-line. Removed all HWIDS for 9500 series and above. (mr_smartepants)
-G\A\B\ ATI Rage PRO 02/28/2002, 5.10.2600.6010 (Muiz & Ruud)
-G\A\C\ ATI Rage XL 12/28/2001, 5.10.2600.6009 (Muiz & Ruud)
-G\I\1\ Intel updated from 02/26/2007,6.14.10.4785 to 05/25/2007,6.14.10.4833 (jtdoom)
-G\I\3\ Intel "updated" 01/13/2007,6.14.10.4764 (jtdoom)
-G\I\4\ intel removed (jtdoom)
-G\I\7\ intel embedded removed (jtdoom)
-G\I\8\ Intel old drivers restored from DP 6.12, 10/06/2006,6.14.10.4704 (jtdoom)
-G\M\1\  Matrox (all) updated to v2.04.00.179 SE U, 05/17/2007 (mr_smartepants)
-G\M\1\ - a functionality FIX. (Ruud)
Moved the following files to G\M\2\:
g200.cat / G200.inf / g200mms.cat / G200MMS.inf / g400.cat / G400.inf / g450.cat / G450.inf / g450mms.cat / G450MMS.inf
g550.cat / G550.inf / DUALGS.inf / dualgs.cat
-G\M\2 Matrox G200, G200 MMS, G400, G450, G450 MMS and G550 legacy driver 05/08/2006, 5.96.004 (Ruud). (Has functionality the NEWEST driver does NOT have)
-G\M\3 through 5  Deleted, all Matrox cards covered by G\M\1\ (mr_smartepants)

To be blunt, I have no faith in nvidia's drivers either.
Sure, you can rip your HWIDs out of the .inf file in G\N\1\ and make your own unique folder with the decompressed drivers you need.

Splitting the DriverPacks...That decision I'll leave up to our more senior leaders.  I can see your point.  I've done something similar with the ATI drivers since ATI themselves point to older drivers for their older cards even though we had the older HWIDs in with the newer drivers (no more).

Both G_A and G_B 7.07test2 DriverPacks are being uploaded now.  Connection is really slow so I might have to try again tomorrow.
The general consensus on other websites is that the nvidia 94.24 drivers are buggy and can't be used by some systems.  Since it's a WHQL release, we're sticking with it.  However, If it proves to be a serious problem for some, we may have to revert to the earlier drivers from G_A 7.03.

Basically, ini files are not needed for those driverpacks.

Why are they needed in the first place?  We use the .ini files to make exceptions for the DPfinisher.
For instance, you wouldn't want the ATI Catalyst Control Center to install if you have an nVidia card, so in the Graphics_A DP we wrote an exception that roughly reads:
IF EXIST C:\ATICCC.ins file AND the D\G\A\1\*.inf file contains a matching HWID for the system THEN EXECUTE D\G\A\1\ATICCC.exe

Easy.
Custom .ini files can be written in the same manner if you need it.  Or you can post a formal request and we can take care of it if it would benefit everyone.

I hope this explains it for you better.

I'm going to look into this but I'm not sure who's at fault.  nVidia's website and drivers are a real pain to work with and confusing as h*ll!  So much for a 'unified' driver package!
And the nv4_go.inf file is not perfect either.

There are two test driverpacks in the other thread.  The latest 7.07test1 is ATI only, so don't grab that one.  The other 7.06test4 is the one you should try if you haven't already.  I'm going to update the 7.07test DP to #2 to include the nVidia drivers in the next day or so.

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 42&p=1

OK, I added support for the Xpress 1250 since that wasn't included in the latest 7.7 Cats (file listings are the same though).
But there's a HWID conflict between your x2500 listing and the official ATI inf.

"ATI MOBILITY RADEON X1700" = ati2mtag_M56, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71DE

That same device ID is listed as x1700, not x2500.  ATI's driver download page doesn't even list an x2500.
I'll add support for that subsystem listing but if there's any conflicts, it's gone.

Ok, that was more than I needed, but thanks for answering the question. 
I'll bump the HWIDs against my .inf and I'll try to upload tonight.

Thanks for the feedback.  The 200M chip is supported by the new 7.07 test#1 Graphics_A DP I have on my desktop.  I've got two more tweaks to add to it (x200/x300 and ACER HWID) and I'll upload it for general testing.

"ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M Series" = ati2mtag_RS480M, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5955
"ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M Series " = ati2mtag_RS400M, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5A42
"ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M Series  " = ati2mtag_RC410M, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5A62

Yeah, I read that too.
I'm running the new 7.7 Cats on my notebook right now and they're running fine. I already have a new Graphics_A 7.07 test DP built but I'm debating uploading it now after what they wrote.  Well, the improvements I wrote into the mobility.inf file should make it worth it.  If it's crap, we can always roll back to 7.06 test#4 (7.6 Catalyst).
I'm still trying to figure out how to upload to the testing server using this crappy connection.
More to follow.

First, welcome to Driverpacks.net!
Second, to answer your question, you need to put all of your downloaded driverpacks into the 'driverpacks' folder where your DPBase.exe is located.
Third, I'd recommend reading through the new tutorial here:
http://64.40.146.141/handbook/beginners … riverpacks
or the original tutorial here:
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=1449

Let us know if you have any other problems.