Search options (Page 8 of 159)

...moving to the BartPE section...
Hmm, I'm guessing you're talking about the graphics core built into the newer CPUs.
Historically, graphics drivers have never been enabled for PE.

If you want to test, then take the current DriverPack Graphics B, edit the .ini and replace the entire [IB] section with the below:

[IB]
; BartPE Code
ms_count	 	= 1
ms_1_tag 	= "IB_igxpmp32"
ms_1_sysfile 	= "igxpmp32.sys"
ms_1_exc_skipIfOS="w2k"

For Vista/Win7/Win8 your best bet would be DaRT (part of the MDOP).
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ … /dart.aspx
I use different DaRT versions for each OS.  6.5 for Vista, 7 for Win7, 8 for Win8.
As cool as DaRT is, it doesn't have the flexibility as UBCD4win.

But for XP, UBCD4win is still the best in my opinion.

I'm curious to hear what others are using too.

...added code tags for ya!

I know right!?
One spammer I just deleted posted 93 times today.

The DriverPacks BASE 'update-checker' was disabled over 2 years ago due to download hosting issues.
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4850

I'll be making this file final over the weekend.
Please test and confirm fix ASAP.

Current Release Candidate:

linked here --> DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_1301rc1

Your hardware is already supported in both DriverPack Chipset and dpms.
DriverPack Chipset \D\C\I\Tcreek.inf
DPMS \D\M\I5\Tcrkahci.inf

Because there is no .sys "driver", we can't add it to the dpms .ini for textmode.  AHCI should be natively supported in the BIOS.

Hiren's image is classed as "warez" because it redistributes commercial software or software that supports software piracy.
The simple fact that it includes RemoveWGA, violates Rule #1.
We don't support warez.

Yes, try loading DriverPack Chipset to the image and see if that helps.
It's always possible that we're missing some drivers that are required by that hardware.
Wow, that laptop is a beast!

First post.  There's also a 'ReadMe.txt' file in the package.

There are a lot of changes in the SAD version that @SteveDun contributed (Thank you!).
I would have coded the new additions differently.  That doesn't make them wrong, just different coding styles.
I haven't had a chance to go through the changes in-depth though, just briefly.
I do plan on rewriting most of the code to incorporate improvements I learned while coding the LIU utility for our LinMin sponsors.

THAT is a very true statement.
I'd ping Jeff and ask him.  He's the sole code contributor.  I have access but I don't contribute anything to the code. 
Be careful what you ask for, Jeff refers to the codebase as a jumbled steaming pile of spaghetti code.