Search options (Page 60 of 213)

Via USB? Nope...

DP_BASE tutorial in my signature

Please do! There is no doubt that it is better for everyone to pool our efforts than to work independently.

Our doors are always open to new team members, especialy those with a proven track record!

Thanks again for your interest in being a team player! All my frustrations have been eliminated.

I'm not surprised we repackaged all of them last week for an upcoming BASE release that supports a new folder structure

the ones that are *s.7z are probably the ones he actually has modded

the rest are ours and the 3rd party DriverPack are right off our server

If you intend to list everyones names you are looking at about 50 names or more

Just Say the Bâshrat the Sneaky's DriverPacks Team and call it a day

If you want to list Greg and SamLab then you need to also point out that they have just modified our packs
(they are not original works! - they are forks of our work)

QuarQ i have no idea about

Muiz is the original author of almost all of the NT6 packs

the point i am trying to make here is that you can't credit someone like SamLab without ALSO crediting EVERY SINGLE PERSON who contributed to that pack before he did. He may have updated a driver but what about the person who originally added it? What about the person who reported it missing in the forum and provided a link to it? What about Bâshrat the Sneaky aka Wim Leers who wrote the first pack?  You simply can't just pick one person and say they did any particular pack Because that is not the case. the packs have been developed by a TEAM of people over many years.

the only fair and equitable solution is to credit them all IE "The DriverPacks Team" if you begin to single out individuals then you have to credit them all and trying to figure out who has done what over the last 7 years will take you longer than it did to write your application

No... clearly the only fair and equitable choice is to credit everyone equally, it was, and is, and will continue to be, a team effort.

it is not fair to call a pack SamLab's and credit him alone when 90% of the work done on that pack was not done by him. It does make sense for him to put his name on a pack he modded, same for greg, that way it allows us to see that it is a fork... I do not belive either of these guys attempts to claim them as original works and neither should you promote them that way in your app...

no more than it would be fair for you to attempt to call your project the BadPointer Solution, based on you being the last person to add something to it.

@SamLab - You know that I love and respect you! I chose you for my example because I feel that you do know how much I do respect you and your contributions to our project. You are truly a DriverPacks hero. I used you only for example and did not mean anything personal!

I am not familiar with QuarQ but greg i am see my last post again i edited it

and Sam is just leaking our nighlties (our test packs ) yes he works on some of them too. lots of other people do also

http://driverpacks.sytes.net/driverpacks/

again i think it is you who is confused

We don't like having our test packs released and Sam knows it so he releases them himslef that does not make it / them his work you will find those packs on our nightly server

gregs work is a fork of OUR work

Bâshrat the Sneaky's DriverPacks Team @ DriverPacks.net

that is all of us... Bâshrat the Sneaky our Leader (Real name Wim Leers), Me the programmer (Real name Jeff Herre), the XP packs team, the Vista packs team (Most notable contributers, Muiz and mr_smartepants), the testing team, and our members who provide feedback. All of these people equally help us to help you.

The "DriverPacks.net Team"

PS there is only one DriverPacks

PSS Your genuine concern and dilgence in addressing this matter has gone a long way to reverse my initial frustration with your project. Thank You for taking your personal time to make sure our projects compliment and respect each other.

thanks for the explaination and the links! I still think your project is dead without our packs
Without drivers it is not much good Just saying... how hard would it be to credit us? One line,
Thanks to DriverPacks.net for the DriverPacks! or This project is supported by DriverPack.net 
It is not much to expect nor do I think it is unreasonable.

PS the download i got from the page (DRPSu9Pro) had 47 driverpacks and all of them were from us

Thanks BadPointer, cleaning up now!

- I promise not to delete your posts going forward!

that is much better... Thanks!
but if the driver does not work then i am not convinced it is a good idea to add it (I'm confused)
long stories are not forbidden

We don't add untested drivers - for obvious reasons

Normally we will add the driver to a nightly and ask the user to test it... if this is not a possability then it will not be added.
(If nobody needs it OR if it does not work, then no sense in adding it )

Can you test this driver? or a test pack (nightly)?

That seems to be only the text mode driver... where is the windows driver?

did you install sp3?

please read read before you post in my signature...

Well your situation is slightly different... you have a registry.

With DriverPacks BASE we do not yet have a registry, It has not been created yet. So i can't add registry entries Directly. Since there is not one created yet. Registry entries can be added from txtsetup.sif but i am not sure exactly how to do that? the other method is to add them to   setupreg.hiv suggested by cdob. It would be easier for me to add to txtsetup.sif but again i am not exactly sure how that would be accomplished. Further I am uncertain if i need other entries too or just the one line.

You are at an advantage with sysprep since you can simply add the registry entries directly .

Jeff

PS i have never understood what the difference was between BartPE and LiveXP / nativeEx? can you enlighten me?
Are they simply two different peoples attempt at creating a PE environment from XP?