Strangely enough, I seem to be experiencing the same problem on my current test install...

2008-08-05 02:18:34 : <KTD>  KTD will not be applied, the DriverPacks will be deleted.
2008-08-05 02:20:13 : <CLNP> Could not delete the DriverPacks, which are located in "C:\D".
2008-08-05 02:20:13 : <CLNP> Added new value to the RunOnce key in the registry: the cleanup of the "C:\D" directory will be retried (through CLI, not through the Finisher) after a reboot.
2008-08-05 02:20:13 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\hwids.dat"!
2008-08-05 02:20:13 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\DPsFnshr.ini"!
2008-08-05 02:20:13 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\devcon.exe"!
2008-08-05 02:20:14 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\makePNF.exe"!
2008-08-05 02:20:14 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\pmtimer.exe"!
2008-08-05 02:20:15 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\*.ins"!
2008-08-05 02:20:15 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\DSPdsblr.exe"!
2008-08-05 02:20:16 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\DriverPack_*.ini"!
2008-08-05 02:20:16 : <CLNP> Deleted "C:\mute.exe"!
2008-08-05 02:20:16 : <CLNP> Added new value to the RunOnce key in the registry: the DriverPacks Finisher itself will get deleted after the next reboot.
2008-08-05 02:20:16 : Program terminated.

D folder still present even after two reboots.
Never happended before and I did not deviate from my ususal settings at all!

The stuff on %systemroot% got all deleted, though...

theshu wrote:

Is there something I don't understand or can anybody explain me how all SATA/RAID Drives can be found even in TextMode-Setup?

Another interesting fact is how Windows can even use the ODD when there's no drivers present for it (could be a SATA drive after all).

In this early phase of setup, rudimentary access to drives is granted by the BIOS, a mode which does not require any specific (non-generic) drivers.

This is also the reason why, if you switch your SATA controller mode from, say, Legacy to RAID, Windows will not finish booting, but it will start and end with a BSOD.
Obviously, to show a BSOD, files have to be loaded from the HDD, however, with no proper drivers available (changing modes will change PCI IDs meaning drivers will be missing), this is again also only possible through the BIOS access method.

In short, what those drivers allow you to do is enabling higher-level drive access for best performance and enhanced features.

378

(4 replies, posted in Software)

Yeah, whether it's really needed is another question.
Basically, I would assume it's for hiding these "ugly" or "strange" windows from customers when you run an installation on their system or let them do that by themselves (so they won't bother you with questions about what that window was that showed for the splint of a second).

Personally, I can do very well with the command windows.
Not bothering in my book.
The installation does not have to look perfect - it's nice when it does, but no requirement.
As long as the outcome is 100% to the desired smile

mr_smartepants wrote:

My board has the Intel X38 chipset which does NOT support SLI, but DOES support CrossFire.

Well, to put it correctly, it's not the board not supporting SLI but Nvidia's drivers not supporting the X38 chipset (deliberately due to company policy...) wink
With some older nForce-drivers you could actually "hack" it in order to run on non-nforce boards.

Basically, ATi allows multi GPU pairing on any platform while Nvidia only allows it on their own chipsets and only the more expensive ones.
Go figure...



What puzzles me right now is whether this may have anything to do with the problem you are experiencing.
One would think not but who knows...

mr_smartepants wrote:

I think the system got confused with two different vendors graphics cards.  Not having the monitor connected to the ATI card probably didn't help.  I should have run a Test #4 to connect the monitor to the ATI card and leave the Nvidia card without a monitor.

Just to make things even more clear:

I assume the following configuration:
NV card in PCIe (PEG)  slot, ATI card in regular PCIe slot (non-PEG).
Or does your board feature more than one PEG slot?
If so, what happens if you swap cards around?
Does the BIOS have an option about which display to init first (as it was in the PCI/AGP days where you could chose between the two)?
What does swapping around here change?

It's pretty bad that one card does not get installed.
Not that mayn folks do use multi-GFX systems but if you want to connect more than two monitors, you can either get a Triple Head from Matrox or use a second card.

381

(1 replies, posted in DriverPack Sound)

Two things:

First: Post in the right Forum - this is for BASE Feature Requests (as the title clearly states).
Second: Be more descriptive about what file does not install when, what you did, how you did it etc.
Also, post your log files and see my sig for more info about the DriverPacks.



**MOVED**

morpheus wrote:

It is not that I'm completely hysterical about it, I'm just laying it out.

Yeah, not trying to say you were, just a general note smile
Thing is, it may get others hysterical if they see the post and just because it's one virus scanner sounding an alarm does not mean it's a definate sign (hence the online scanners).
OTOH, if you do not post about it we wouldn't have a chance to check it out, so I'm fine with posting.
Just advising to always take such warnings with a grain of salt.

newsposter wrote:

Kasperky and Avast are both notorious for false positives AND for missing some of the more stealthy viruii.

That's news for me with Kas, but I do know Avast and AntiVir for this behaviour.

Better to Pay for something like Trend or McAfee Enterprise.  Stay away from Norton.

Personally, I'm a friend of NOD32.

But indeed, Norton should be avoided, unless you get the professional (as in for companies) solution like Endpoint Protection.

383

(4 replies, posted in Software)

Heh, what a surprise, AntiVir and AVG once again being abotu the only programmes deteting a valid file as a false positive.

I mean, I cannot be conincedence when almost everywhere you go no matter what topic, users report false positives of various files, it's 99% one of these scanners.

My personal opinion is to dumb them and use something else.
What good is it for if it makes you paranoid seing evil around every corner (file)?

At least they chose a proper designation so you can see it's only a harmless hide tool...

morpheus wrote:

I'm not sure if this is a false negative.

False positive, if at all. wink

http://www.virustotal.com/
http://virusscan.jotti.org/

Upload the file in question here and have it scanned by 20+ different engines of well-known virus scanners.
Then you can tell by yourself whether it's your scanner or a real virus/trojan/malware thing.

It's worth bookmarking these, btw.
I'd recommend scanning any file you got from the net and find somewhat suspicious.

Saves you and other from getting hysterical over a false positive report wink

(not saying we get many of these and certainly we do not mind reports but still it's better to make sure first smile)

OverFlow wrote:

I tried to get rid of my double post and they both disappeared... strange

Forum glitch.
Happens more often than it should (read: never).
Best is to leave them both, unless you manually double-posted, the other one ususally vanishes after some time.

Hopefully the server move will cure this!

umapathy wrote:

yeah simple CDN works better than the previous provider. Inbetween just one suggestion. Wouldn't it be better if we host the files in free sites like Microsoft skydrive? rather than on a paid site.

And thereby losing the ability to directly deep-link to the files so you can start the DL right away instead of being transferred to the DL site, needing to find the DL link again, then, maybe having it Dl (I also experienced where the files were present on Skydrive but I could not Dl them for a whole day with no error given)?

No, thanks.

While OCHs might be great for hosting you latest private file for a couple of friends, it's certainly not as professional as a big project like this needs.

One could always use OCHs as a temporal solution if there's problems with the main host, but I don't see them as our priemiere choice.

Plus, as it has already been said, it doesn't cost us anything, so why not use CDN? big_smile

mINDsELFiNDULGE wrote:

Is there perhaps a registry entry I can sabotage so all devices get reinstalled on a reboot? I heard Win9* had that possibility. Some device index entry?

Dunno, but that would still require the HAL to be the same as you cannot reinitialize that.
Then again, 9x is pretty much totally different from NT in so many things there's no reason to compare.

The eee PC flash guide was actually what I was using. smile But I'm not sure this counts as a bootable CD drive? I think there are BIOSes that support a USB CD player as bootable, but not necessarily a USB Flash? Am I wrong?

Yeah, this is why I said, if the BIOS supports it.
IDK whether a "true" USB ODD will appear different to the BIOS than a flash drive, but if you cannot boot from USB at all (no option present), you may be at a dead end.
Never done that myself, though, so no guarantees on anything wink

I know there are side USB Floppy drives too, but I wasn't aware that the BIOS boot order needs to support a "USB Device" to use those side floppies.

I'd think so, because it is being adressed via the US-Bus rather than the floppy bus.

My ideal is to never need a CD/DVD/Floppy again and only ever use flash/thumb drives.

That definately would be preferred.

I was hoping there was a way to fool the driver installer into thinking it's always searching "removable media"? Ideally a reg file that would turn this on, and a second one that would turn this off.

Yeah, dunno, there's this option to always search WindowsUpdate, so maybe it's possible.

KTD?

Keep the Drivers, it'S a BASE option (please read the description there or refer to the FAQ on this forum (see sig).

mr_smartepants wrote:

Besides, it's a low-profile card with no wheezing fan so I can use it to build a HTPC in the future if I want. smile

Ok, but wouldn't the missing HDMI-out kinda defeat that plan (at least if you want to have digital sound-out, you can convert the DVI to HDMI, of course)?

Just wondering; personally, I'm more than fine with analogue stereo sound.
Don't even have a fancy 7.1 speaker set, just this good ole HiFi rack from Telefunken dating from the 70ies big_smile
Plus, it got an LP player!

jaws1975 wrote:

update at first post.
updated info at first post as well.

has anybody tried these??????????
zero feedback so far.
am I wasting my time?

Nah, certainly not.
In the other thread, you could see there was a demand.
Thing is probably just that folks may have forgotten over time.

You may want to PM the requester so that he knows of you programme.

Also, I think we have many lurkers here and folks that have not registered.
This will follow the link and use the software but do not tell about it (unfortunately).
Maybe you can monitor thread acces figures to get an idea for popularity.

It definately is on my testing list (though I see no direct need for myself), but as with the other tests, it will have to wait a while... hmm

mINDsELFiNDULGE wrote:

I have a laptop with no CD player and this saved me. You rock! Swapping harddrives to another laptop, installing xp, and disabling certain drivers and then swapping harddrives back was just NOT working (anyone know a good way of doing that?? I seemed so close, yet so far)

Nah, only thing you could do is either make a Sysprep (search the forum for the term) or install on the other machine only so far as to the first reboot (where it has copied all the files from the CD, yet not installed any non-generic drivers), then shut it down and swap HDDs.
That may work if the HAL is identical (was it also a laptop?)

Next, can I format a USB Flash Drive to appear as a USB DVD bootable drive? Then I can place this on it and simply add DPacks as needed (and other tools) (well, not quite, but this relates to this).

Yeah, that works, if the BIOS supports it.
I think the wiki for the EEE PC has a guide to this, google for it.
You could also buy a IDE/SATA to USB adaptor and connect a generic ODD to it.
Things cost like $15 maybe.

Oh, and a slight side question. Is there a way for XP's driver search installer to search sub folders? (like Vista does) Is there a reg edit to the path folders I can do? Wildcards? Maybe a simple program?

XP does search all folders for drivers if they are on an optical medium, but not if they are on a HDD.
KTD will index the DP drive folders so that XP will search them all recursively.
You could put them onto an ISO and mount with DeamonTools if you still want to keep in on a HDD...

Which ones do you want to have cleaned up?
All the rest in this thread?

Will be done right away.
If any other, just bleep wink

392

(15 replies, posted in News)

Bâshrat the Sneaky wrote:

It's not yet on the new server, I just wrote this already wink You're not supposed to have read this yet tongue

So, it's a draft for news then, eh?

Who would have guessed! big_smile


PS: You don't happen to be a part-time journalist, Bâshrat the Sneaky?
Writing the news before the events happen is rather common among them, I have been told (they just want to be prepared for whatever the outcome is).

Erik, I will test them, definately!
I need to reinstall anyway.

Thing is just, additionally to the heat, I have also been very busy all day long at my grandma's the whole week!
Need to do some desperate repairs at the house, renovation of the outer walls (they really look terrible after all these years being exposed to the elements) and I need to get this done before winter (because I fear frost will do additional damage) and I also cannot and do not want to work in bad weather (so the sun is welcome, albeits it's a bit too much for physical work in the open...).

So, yeah, I only got as far as testing on the test PC and that's that.
Don't get home before 11 PM and I don't feel much like backing this thing up, burning a new disc (as you updated the pack) and running a test instal that may potentially fail hmm

Maybe I can find another system with an AGP port to put the card in and boot and install from a USB disk, but it won't be done before Sunday, I fear...

Again, I'm sorry for having promised this (yet, I' still eager to keep it!).

Can you send the wrong card back, at least?
Would hate to see you waste money sad

If that's you main concern, just pull the plug, eh? big_smile

So, I guess I can now finally unstick the other, partially request, thread and set this one up.
smile

subigo wrote:

I'm duel-booting XP and backtrack right now.

Be careful not to have one of the OS shoot out the other...


SCNR big_smile

Thing is, 64bit applications also take up more space on the HDD and more RAM than their 32bit counterparts.
While you finally can address more than 4GB on a 64bit OS, this should also be taken into consideration when you want to switch.

Of course, you could still use 32bit apps, but then the question araises, what's the use? wink

Hmm, open project, I think not.

While the source code has been laid out, it is not available to just anyone.
You have to become a member of the Code Team to get access and that means you have to show you are willing and capable to contribute to the project.

Also, the DriverPacks themselves do not contain OS software, quite the contrary (proprietary drivers!).
Dunno SF.net's usage policy but I doubt they'd want to host that.

All we could host would be BASE if we decided to fully OS it.
And granted, that is the least of the hosting problems, right?

slipstreamin wrote:

Thanks Helmi, nice gas mask!

big_smile

It's for when Spam Bots attack! wink

gore.m wrote:

VirtualPC :
I downloaded Virtual PC I installed it (I had problem with instalation , because it said it is not supporting Home Edition , but installation was completed) , I tried to instal XP (included drivespacks) , it works good , installer miss loading and offer me partiton to instal .

Yes, you cannot install VPC on an XP Home Edition - that'S a limitation by MS (you can run an XP Home inside the VM, though).

You should try Virtual Box in your case:
http://www.virtualbox.org/