Topic: [IMPL] Intel Matrix Storage v8.6.0.1007 10/12/2008
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_ … ldID=15251
Last edited by Fragbert (2008-10-14 17:42:36)
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
DriverPacks.net Forum » DriverPack Mass Storage » [IMPL] Intel Matrix Storage v8.6.0.1007 10/12/2008
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_ … ldID=15251
Last edited by Fragbert (2008-10-14 17:42:36)
I'm on it...
/DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_806B.7z
(( link pulled ))
Last edited by Jaak (2008-06-08 12:47:28)
Hi
I was uploading grap B and C testpacks when I saw this appear.. grins.
I hope this tests good.. it looks like a good job.
(I have gotten me an ICH9 and ICH9R mobo to test on.. so it's gonna be fun.)
8.06C (06 June 2008)
driverpacks_nightlies/DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_806C.7z
MD5 hash 86516c2970912b1b0a4a0589f48fdf11
Changed
'[I3] Intel Maxtrix Storage 09/29/2007,7.8.0.1012, keep support for hardware not covered by new intel driver.'.
'|[AD2] removed'.
'|[IB4] removed'.
'|[IB5] removed',
Fixed
'',
New
'[ADC] Adaptec SAS/SATA-II RAID for server 2003, 02/08/2008,5.2.0.15728'.
'|[H3K] Highpoint RocketRaid RR182x/181x for windows 2000'.
'|[H3S] Highpoint RocketRaid RR182x/181x for windows 2003'.
'|[I4] Intel Matrix Storage 04/20/2008, 8.2.0.1001',
Updated
'[ADB] Adaptec SAS/SATA-II RAID for XP, from 09/15/2007, 5.2.0.15317 to 02/08/2008, 5.2.0.15728',
notes
JsE did the real work on adaptec and IBM. http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2363
Last edited by Jaak (2008-07-15 17:51:04)
Thanks for all the good work. I appreciate the time you spend and don't want to look impatient. Yet I'm eager to apply the new Intel Matrix Storage.
In DriverPacks Overview the MassStorage Pack is still 8.05. Is it safe to use 8.06C or should I wait until a final version appears in Overview?
Hi
you can use this test pack.
Several people have been using it, and the only thing I see is that we was asked to update the VIA hyperion driver.
I was abroad for a while and felt like I could use some rest.
I will probably do the Via REQuest soon, and we may be able to test and then get it to release before end of June.
re - Is it safe to use 8.06C or should I wait...
The only way packs become final is if we recieve posts from users saying there are no issues. It's a perfect opprtunity to help yourself - try it... and if it works let us know it did.
we get a critical mass of positive feed back on teh test packs and BAM it's a release.
help us to help you!
And post your hwids with your feedback if you want to see us do a little dance of happyness
OK, I will integrate streaming video as well ;-)
Hi guys! I saw that JMicro had updated Windows 2000/XP/Vista 32/64-bit JMB36X/JMB37X/JMB38x driver to version 1.17.38WHQL (06/23/08').
ftp://driver.jmicron.com.tw/jmb36x/Win2 … 38WHQL.zip
ftp://driver.jmicron.com.tw/jmb36x/Win2 … e_Note.txt
I think it will be good to update this driver in DriverPack.
P.S.: Sorry if I posted about it in wrong place and show me where it must be.
Last edited by pretzel (2008-06-28 04:18:20)
Thx for reporting pretzel. Actually I added this one 2 days ago in my test pack. I will upload it asap.
Last edited by JakeLD (2008-06-28 07:52:27)
Updated! v8.2.3.1001
Updated! v8.2.3.1001
IMHO this driver is for Intel boards only. For other board it still is 8.2.0.1001: http://downloadcenter.intel.com/filter_ … ;submit=Go!
I'm reluctant integrating an Intel board driver on my non-Intel (p.e. Gigabyte) board, even if it's newer.
Will the update driverpack contain both versions or just the newest for Intel boards?
Fragbert wrote:Updated! v8.2.3.1001
IMHO this driver is for Intel boards only. For other board it still is 8.2.0.1001: http://downloadcenter.intel.com/filter_ … ;submit=Go!
I'm reluctant integrating an Intel board driver on my non-Intel (p.e. Gigabyte) board, even if it's newer.
Will the update driverpack contain both versions or just the newest for Intel boards?
I'm sorry, unless you provide some concrete proof that this GENERIC iastor driver is "for intel boards only" (this is not an opinion), I am calling this statement as complete nonsense. Furthermore I'm reporting your post to be removed as it helps nobody.
This is a intel southbridge driver, nothing more.
Last edited by Fragbert (2008-07-03 23:57:17)
@Fragbert,
Sorry for my ignorance and your subtile way of making that clear
Just a humble explanation of how my insane 'opinion' disturbed my mind:
Following your link I read: "Installs the Intel® Matrix Storage Technology (RAID) driver version 8.2.3.1001 for Intel® Desktop Boards." and "valid for the products listed below".
From Intel Download Center > Chipsets > Chipset Software > Intel® Matrix Storage Manager > Windows* XP Professional I'm getting to the place I provided a link to; ver.# 8.2.0.1001.
I'm still trying to figure out how I could have overlooked the consideration of Intel messing up their site
Last edited by Kees030 (2008-07-04 02:02:31)
Frabert
Updated! v8.2.3.1001
Can you paste the direct link ? So far, I can't find it.
@Fragbert,
Sorry for my ignorance and your subtile way of making that clear
Just a humble explanation of how my insane 'opinion' disturbed my mind:
Following your link I read: "Installs the Intel® Matrix Storage Technology (RAID) driver version 8.2.3.1001 for Intel® Desktop Boards." and "valid for the products listed below".
From Intel Download Center > Chipsets > Chipset Software > Intel® Matrix Storage Manager > Windows* XP Professional I'm getting to the place I provided a link to; ver.# 8.2.0.1001.
I'm still trying to figure out how I could have overlooked the consideration of Intel messing up their site
Basic investigation of the actual drivers will lead anyone to conclude there is no unique hwid's pertaining to a particular board. This is not the first nor the last incident where intel releases chipset/iastor drivers that list their branded boards in a compatability list.
Per the readme.txt, you will see the hardware requirements are particular southbridges, not boards.
************************************************************
* 1. OVERVIEW
************************************************************The Intel(R) Matrix Storage Manager is designed to provide
functionality for the following Storage Controllers:
RAID Controllers:
- Intel(R) ICH8M-E/ICH9M-E SATA RAID Controller
- Intel(R) ICH8R/ICH9R/ICH10R SATA RAID Controller
- Intel(R) ESB2 SATA RAID Controller
- Intel(R) ICH7MDH SATA RAID Controller
- Intel(R) ICH7R/DH SATA RAID Controller
AHCI Controllers:
- Intel(R) ICH10R SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) EP80579 SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ICH9M-E/M SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ICH9R/DO/DH SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ICH8M-E/M SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ICH8R/DH/DO SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ESB2 SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ICH7M/MDH SATA AHCI Controller
- Intel(R) ICH7R/DH SATA AHCI Controller************************************************************
* 2. SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
************************************************************1. The system must contain an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo or
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme or Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor
or Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processor and one of the following
Intel products listed in section 1 above.
2. The system must be running on one of the following
operating systems:
- Microsoft* Vista*
- Microsoft* Vista* x64 Edition (NOTE 1)
- Microsoft* Windows* Server 2008
- Microsoft* Windows* Server 2008 x64 Edition (Note 1)
- Microsoft* Windows* XP Home Edition
- Microsoft* Windows* XP Professional
- Microsoft* Windows* XP x64 Edition (NOTE 1)
- Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003
- Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003,
Web x64 Edition (NOTE 1)
- Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003,
Standard x64 Edition (NOTE 1)
- Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition (NOTE 1)
- Microsoft* Windows* Media Center EditionNOTE 1: If the system is running Windows* 64-bit version,
the Intel(R) Matrix Storage Manager driver supporting
64-bit should be used.3. The following operating systems are not supported:
Any version of the following Microsoft operating systems:
- MS-DOS
- Windows 3.1
- Windows NT 3.51
- Windows 95
- Windows 98
- Windows Millennium Edition (Me)
- Windows NT 4.0
- Windows 2000 Datacenter Server
- Windows 2000 Professional
- Windows 2000 Advanced ServerAny version of the following operating systems:
- Linux
- UNIX
- BeOS
- MacOS
- OS/24. The system should contain at least the minimum system
memory required by the operating system.5. The 'Intel(R) Chipset Software Installation Utility'
must be installed prior to installing the
Intel(R) Matrix Storage Manager.
Thanks for adding ICHR support! It worked like a charm here !
Cheers,
Kal
Fragbert did what i am usually guilty of. he gave the correct answer. it just did not read well/nice.
he meant no harm, i assure you. We're techs not english teachers LOL. I really liked your response hee hee.
I find that if you phrase things as a question (Which you did - yay!) and say please and thank you it draws better answers.
don't worry if we use an intel or any other brand of driver. if we have established that it supports a certain HWID there is no reason to worry. drivers are matched by HWID not by name, names don't matter at all.
on some occasions especially with certain OEM (like dell), a card will have the same base hwid as a generic ( say nvida ) but the dell graphics card will only work with the dell driver. in these cases we can make edits to the dell inf to limit it to a specific card (HWID subsystem) so it coexists with the generic. This doesn't happen very often...
The best thing for everybody is to test it. If it doesnt work give us your HWID and tell us it failed...
We will figure it out and fix it.
Even better for everyone is to test it and let us know it worked!
Thanks to all of you for your help and the time you spend here.
Jeff
806E removed
Last edited by Jaak (2008-07-28 09:00:20)
good thinking on the file name Jaak! well done.
the reasoning behind putting unedited files back in the VIA is that signing probably got broken for PnP.
the name "8.06.E" was on purpose.
JakeLD mentioned he wrote a 806D (which he had not yet uploaded), and I did not want to use 807a.
signing is good we like signing
I still have no Internet at my new apartment...i should be able to work on the new mass storage pack this week. I won't let you guys down, I promise!
JakeLD,
please do not see this as a rebuke.
I made 806E with unadulerated drivers because I think the single HWID that some see as (we wanna have that OLD hwid) was most probably causing more issues than what it solved, and editing out lines for x64 also breaks signing.
I did not pull links to 806C.
806C has syprepped optimised INFs for Via.
806E has WHQL.
We will no longer look at size because size does not mean much in download price now.. We look at quality.
I am not saying that we will undo all syprep optimisations, but we must at least find out why via became a thorn in our hide.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 3 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
[ Generated in 0.029 seconds, 11 queries executed ]