[REL] [x86, 32 bit] ALL DriverPack's Repacked (Page 5 of 10)

Splendid idea, could have been one of my own

Done, and updating with the latest packs also done!

Coming up next - useful links:
• If you like this project, please support it with your donation!      • Grab your HW info (HWIDs) here!     
• If you are a newbie, be sure to check out the DriverPacks tutorial!     • Here's how to create your own DP!

the modem Pack was UPdated.

release 7.09.22 is available

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=1317

Last edited by Jaak (2007-09-22 21:49:51)

can i ask,im naive to all this,its for my webcam,its an amcap webcam and my comp doesnt install the drivers,what drivers would i need to use?

The whole host seems to be down ATM, so I can't do anything about the links (can't even verify whether they'd still be valid or not).

Give it a couple of hours/days...

Coming up next - useful links:
• If you like this project, please support it with your donation!      • Grab your HW info (HWIDs) here!     
• If you are a newbie, be sure to check out the DriverPacks tutorial!     • Here's how to create your own DP!

I corrected the modem link.
It looks as though someone has uploaded another Modem pack and moved the old one, however did not provide a changelog for the new pack (v7.11.20) Whoever upped this file please provide a changelog so we can link to the file if needed.

Thanks

Hi,
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2159

Dolivas included changelog.
I just posted the changelog in that REQ topic I link to here..

twig.

http://3rdpartydriverpacks.thesneaky.co … 2/?C=M;O=A

right click and copy link, class by date to see the most recent.

Read BEFORE you post  HWID's Tool  DriverPacks tutorial  DriverForge & FindHWIDs



Donate!

Yes, I am well aware of this link, however, the packs that I stated do not have a posts that I can find stating that the pack was being released, nor a changelog with the current changes... correct me if I'm wrong. But IMO, I don't like linking to 'unknown' packs that just appear on the server

Hi Dolivas

(This is for all helpers/contributors)

I can see what causes this.
A REQ topic gets posted by a member, and a DriverPacks helper decides to make a new Pack.
The helper replies about the new Pack in the REQ topic, and that won't change its title, because the member asking for the addition does not change it when asked to do so (if he gets asked at all, that is).
The result is that we see a new DP in the downloads, and no topic about the release.

What can be done about this?
When the Pack was tested and the requestee (or others) tell the helper it loaded that new driver just fine, the helper can post a RELEASE topic.
The helper could ask a senior team member or moderator or main team to do this for him, but this is not the best solution either.
For MODEM I posted a release once, and several people posted replies with new requests, or posted there was a new pack ready, etc, in that topic.
I edited the topic title and first post so that we would have some sort of history on the pack.
BUT, doing that, we get a situation where a year old topic gets edited and re-edited, and edited all over again and again, which makes reading the edited topic a "erm" very weird experience because everything is referrring to stuff you don't read about no more..

That's why we would rather have that a tested third party DP gets a proper RELEASE topic by the creator.

Last edited by Jaak (2007-12-21 18:46:50)

update:
OMG, i wrote really long post, sry4 that, and sry 4 my poor english, please have patience and read it.

Hi every1,

This is my first post

INTRO
I am msfn.org member for a few years.....
Few days ago i needed to slipstream SP2 into WINXP, then i discovered RyanVM integrator(it was all coz i was 2 lazy to integrate SP2 manually in command prompt ), and then i discovered DriverPacks and read about , so at first i didn't know what it is, then i did some research and somehow i found driverpacks.net(and read "How did it come into existance? (A brief history)") and this forum.

-When i realized the potential of this idea i got the chills, but then again i was a bit skeptical coz i dont know how a windows during setup in installation process uses another drivers(DRIVERpacks).....well this part is still unclear to me , and i like to know how these things work,doh.

Huh, okay, i see i started to blabber, so let me get to my questions:

I have laptop ASUS X51R and it has "ATI raedeon xpress 1100".
I slipstreamed all driverpacks(all ten of them), and i tried it at my desktop PC(also with radeon card) and all was perfect, coz all hardware drivers was detected and installed from the packs...incredible, worked like a charm.
-Then i tried it with my ASUS X51R laptop and VGA(ATI raedeon xpress 1100) drivers didn't install nor the modem drivers, but ati SMB and wireless drivers installed successfully.
1)Are drivers for ATI raedeon xpress 1100 included in 3rd party driverpacks?
2)Is it safe to use(slipstream) all ALL driverpacksRepacked  from this post http://3rdpartydriverpacks.thesneaky.co … 2/?C=M;O=A

thanks in advance

Thanks for the welcome,
I have done as you suggested, so i have opened another thread, posted WHIDS and posted an ASUS link.
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 356#p18356
I hope that will be enough

But the same question bothers me again: is it safe to integrate all 3RDparty drivers, from this thread,will they conflict, i mean did Bâshrat the Sneaky approve it?