1,626

(19 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

OK thanks.  I'll get to work on this.  Would you be able to test the result once I get it uploaded?

tstaddon wrote:

DNS resolves fine to the sites even if I don't auth to the proxy server or firewall. To actually browse the sites I need to client auth to the firewall or go through the proxy server. When I get the chance, I'll look into that further but based on your comment that might be a good place for me to start.

That's actually a valid point.  And something that I can test as well.
My site has nearly a 1000 users.  We also use an AD network (biometric Common Access Card-CAC logins) with GPO using Security Groups.  Anyone logging in with any elevated privileges other than "user" gets denied access to the proxy server.  So admins can have access to the shared network drives, but denied access to the outside world.  Pings and Traceroutes to common sites DO work (sometimes), but no traffic is allowed. 

I'll smuggle in a copy of DriverPacks BASE and test in both user and admin access on our network tomorrow and report back.
We're in the middle of upgrading all our Vista workstations to Win7 (finally!) so even if I blow it up, I'll just wipe it and install Win7 fresh. wink

tstaddon wrote:

And they have to maintain STRICT build standards. Since the apps are all QA'd to the Nth degree the main headache for them moving forward, is going to be the ever-changing availability of the exact same hardware to go with their standard build. Because every time they have to load a new set of drivers, THAT is a month of change control. What they really want is a universal install image, with a preset bundle of drivers that will DEFINITELY work, regardless of the hardware, that has a specfic set of Windows Updates, doesn't update automatically, has specific applications, and is then locked down so it cannot be modified except by explicit, authorized means.

That is the opportunity I'm talking about. If Driver packs can be validated ONCE then these industries and clients will save themselves THOUSANDS of hours of expensive change control. They would probably be willing to pay for it.

Ah, there's the problem.  I've had this argument with our administrators the the nth degree.  With DriverPacks, there are no absolutes.
It's greatest strength is also it's greatest weakness.
DriverPacks is a community project.  Yes, we have a small number of core developers and a larger group of testers BUT (and here's the kicker) we cannot guarantee 100% "chain of custody" of the drivers.
I can personally vouch for about 90% of the drivers that are directly sourced from the OEM vendors themselves, but lots of hands have been in these cookie jars.  It's these unknowns that scare away the organizations that require the utmost security.  That saddens me.

I built the LAN-RIS Third Party DriverPack myself and I can guarantee that ALL the drivers were directly sourced from the vendors BUT only roughly half of them are digitally signed.

I wrote:

System admins should always strive to use digitally signed drivers as a matter of course, but these are not always available.  You must utilize whatever information risk management processes your organization encourages.

And this is the main reason that my organization refuses to use DriverPacks.  They insist on gathering the drivers themselves.  Ah well.

Please read the "read before you post" linked in my signature.
Then post your HWID list and DPs_BASE.log here.

1,629

(5 replies, posted in Software)

The AHCI controller is on your motherboard. neutral

mr_smartepants wrote:

...Then post your HWID list and DPs_BASE.log here.

Please?

1,630

(19 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

It's OK, the card was supported before.  I just need to add the HWID back in.  It must have been dropped during the update.
I'll get it added back in to DriverPack Graphics C.
Can you tell me which Graphics pack worked for you in the past?

1,631

(5 replies, posted in Software)

Your post told me nothing about your HDD controller. As a result, nothing in your post can help us help you.
Please read the "read before you post" linked in my signature.
Then post your HWID list and DPs_BASE.log here.

1,632

(19 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

Well that's a very old card.  I may have to add it to DriverPack Graphics C which uses the older v93.71 driver.
The new driver in DriverPack Graphics A does not natively support your card.

1,633

(19 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

I know it's a long shot, but can you try this driver (it's for Vista, but might work)?
Or this older one:

1,634

(19 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

No problem.  A HWID is a Hardware ID.  You can see them when in the Device manager.  Download the HWID tool linked in my signature and it will extract all the HWIDs from your system and output to a text file.  Then just cut/paste to here.  Easy. smile

LOL, I just couldn't help but laugh big_smile  You two are so similar in demeanor!

tstaddon wrote:

is there any code inside 10.06 ON THE CLIENT SIDE that is in the process of being rewritten on the basis that download links aren't available anymore.

YES.  An update is being developed with the downloads in mind.  However no timeline is given.

Considering what you said about the large array of PCs available to you for testing...would you have any with nvidia RAID controllers?  We're in desperate need of Nvidia testers in this thread.
I'd be grateful for any feedback you'd be able to provide.

zawakened wrote:

In my situation - driver is 256.00 installed, but CPL doesn't, when i launch DP_Install_Tool.cmd( and it launches DPInst.exe of cource ) it skips the nvidia video card and do not install CPL for already installed driver.

I've encountered this behavior my self.  I do not know what causes it but I've seen it with my own system (Nvidia 8800 GTS).

I make it a point to ALWAYS include the txtsetup.oem file in dpms (when possible) because it contains some valuable info that the .inf does not.  Like you said, it's easy enough to write a script the seek out and rename them all if you need to.

1,638

(37 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack LAN)

LOL, and I had just moved it onto the main server too.

1,639

(67 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack LAN)

LOL, and I had just moved it onto the main server too.

1,640

(109 replies, posted in Universal Imaging)

zawakened wrote:
OverFlow wrote:

the main issue with sysprep it is has half the normal size allocated to ram for caching the drivers. IE 4096 for Install 2048 for sysprep... So one has to be choosey.... trying to include all mass storage drivers will fail.

I don't know who told you such thing,

The OEMpnpDriversPath limit set by Microsoft is actually 2047 characters, not 2048.
Read: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/285902

Microsoft wrote:

The OEMPnpDriversPath value in the Sysprep.inf file is limited to 2047 characters.
...
To work around this limitation, manually enter the path that is provided in OEMPnpDriversPath into the DevicePath entry and then remove OEMPnpDriversPath from the Sysprep.inf file before running Sysprep.
...
Using large paths in OEMPnpDriversPath and DevicePath may cause application or heap errors to occur on the computer.

zawakened wrote:

Normally when you launch DriverPacks Finisher it seeks for devices without drivers, and install missing drivers,

WRONG!  DriverPacks Finisher does NOT install drivers!  It only executes tasks set in the DPsFnshr.ini only if certain criteria are met.  It does NOT install missing drivers.
DPinst.exe WILL do what you are asking.  It will install missing drivers, which is what we programmed it to do in the DP_Install_Tool.cmd file.

zawakened wrote:

About sysprep problem (4096 for normal install, 2048 for sysprep) - i don't know what you are about,

Sorry, my mistake.  The OEMpnpDriversPath limit set by Microsoft is actually 2047 characters, not 2048.
Read: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/285902

Microsoft wrote:

The OEMPnpDriversPath value in the Sysprep.inf file is limited to 2047 characters.
...
To work around this limitation, manually enter the path that is provided in OEMPnpDriversPath into the DevicePath entry and then remove OEMPnpDriversPath from the Sysprep.inf file before running Sysprep.
...
Using large paths in OEMPnpDriversPath and DevicePath may cause application or heap errors to occur on the computer.

So I am still confused about what problem you are having or what you want to accomplish.  Sysprep is not my strong point (I don't use it).
1) Does the Nvidia control panel install normally during a normal disc-based install with DriverPacks integrated (either method-1 or 2) using DriverPacks BASE?
2) If not, please post your DPs_BASE.log and DPsFnshr.log (zipped/uploaded to mediafire.com)

You are trying to use tools for things they were not designed for.

1,642

(19 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

What are your HWIDs?

Actually they are NOT missing.  The .inf file renames certain source files INTO those files during the 'copyfiles' phase of installation.  So while they APPEAR to be missing, they will not be missing during the installation.
Example:

[alta.CopyFiles]
*name-of-file*,*file-to-copy-from*,,*destination_dir*
dlh5x.sys,dlh5xnd5.sys,,2

1,644

(6 replies, posted in DriverPack Sound)

You tried this one?
http://support.dell.com/support/downloa … leid=53829

What are your HWIDs?

1,645

(6 replies, posted in DriverPack Sound)

Did you try the DriverPacks?

You could always download the driver from Dell.com wink

Yes, you're correct.  Those files are missing from the source, but I'm not sure if they'd actually cause problems.  They should be renamed during the 'copyfiles' phase.  The x64 files are normally removed from these packs because the DriverPacks are x86 only. wink
I'll look into it.  Stickied for reference.
Thanks for your report! smile

zawakened wrote:

After first login i run DP_Install_Tool.cmd and it installs the remaining drivers( those which paths cannot be placed in "OemPnpDriversPath" due to 4096 length limitation ).

From what I understand, the problem with sysprep is that it has half the normal size allocated to ram for caching the drivers. (4096 for normal install, 2048 for sysprep).  File path limits in sysprep is a known issue.  You have to be VERY selective in which drivers you choose to use in sysprep.

When I slipstream drivers into Vista/Win7, I only use dpms, Chipset, & LAN.  I use SAD for the rest post-install.
I'm certain you'd have success by following the same procedures for sysprep.  Limit your sysprep-installed drivers to ONLY dpms, Chipset & (maybe) LAN, and use the dpinst cmd file for the rest.


zawakened wrote:

Finally my question is:
Is it possible to run DPsFnshr.exe in way of updating installed devices drivers and it's software?

You can call DriverPacks Finisher at any point during GUIRunOnce or RunOnceEx (or after).

You can have DriverPacks Finisher execute AFTER the first desktop loads by using a trick suggested by our forum member Ricktendo64.
Here's an example for how I execute WPIW after the first desktop loads.
Contents of $OEM$\cmdlines.txt

[COMMANDS]
"rundll32 advpack.dll,LaunchINFSection RunWPI.inf,,1,N"

Contents of $OEM$\RunWPI.inf

;###################################################################
;#### The post install starter for WPI designed by: ricktendo64 ####
;#### Used for Windows 2000, XP and 2003...                     ####
;###################################################################

[Version]
Signature="$CHICAGO$"

[DefaultInstall]
AddReg=Run.AddReg

[Run.AddReg]
HKLM,"%RUN%","%WPI%",,"RunDll32 advpack.dll,LaunchINFSection ""%01%\%INF%"",Execute"


[Execute]
AddReg              = OfficeFix
RunPreSetupCommands = Launch.WPI:1
DelReg              = Run.DelReg

[officefix]
HKCU,"Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main","Disable Script Debugger",0x0,"no"
HKCU,"Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main","DisableScriptDebuggerIE",0x0,"no"

[Launch.WPI]
CMD /Q /C CD /D """%01%\..\WPI""" & START /WAIT /B WPI.exe

[Run.DelReg]
HKLM,"%RUN%","%WPI%"

[Strings]
RUN="SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RUN"
WPI="Windows Post Install"
INF="RunWPI.inf"

Rick is VERY clever! wink

1,648

(15 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)

So is this driver still needed?
Section [L0] already contains a newer driver than the original poster wanted AND it contains the exact same HWIDs (with a Dell reference in the .inf) to the driver cdob posted.
I'd say this thread is solved.

So really, you're using a method 2 1/2 (driver files are not compressed during run).  I don't think we ever tried that in testing.
You're doing a lot of effort for little gain.  Method 1 decompresses the .7z files, then .cab compresses them all.  You're then decompressing them AGAIN and .7z compressing AGAIN!
You'd be better off just selecting method 2 (DriverPacks compressed in 7zip).  If you really wanted to, you could decompress all the individual DriverPacks, then recompress into a single pack (rename using the standard convention: DP_*name*_wnt5_x86-32_*date*.7z) and just double-click the DP_Install_Tool.cmd file like normal.  You'd still get your desired result.

We've also been working on a new replacement SAD2 command file you could test for us (used for both NT5 & NT6 OS).
Link here:
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 590#p41590

As to the Nvidia control panel, it's embedded in the driver files now.  There's no separate installer.  The DPsFnshr.ini entry just writes a registry entry based on whether the user wants the new/old control panel style (or none).  I'm not even sure if that works anymore with the new control panel nvidia is using.

Thanks, I'll take a look.
*Edit
I have them added to \D4 in our release candidate 11.01r1.
@ATechGuy, Can you test?