While this does look a bit fishy at the first glance, I cannot find anything wrong with the post nor the referred site.
Looks pretty legit to me, though it does contain a bit much self-promotion.
I agree that a single link to the site would have been sufficient and we, in general, are not an nLite forum, although it is probably used by most users (myself included).

As I can see how this may appear helpful for one or another, I will let this thread stay for the time being.

BigBrit wrote:

Helmi, if I am out of line please let me know.

You, nah, definately not!

Also, rest assured that if anyone is out of line I'll make sure they know about it! big_smile tongue


rado354 wrote:

I keep this guide and list with available addons updated on several boards.
PMing Bâshrat the Sneaky before posting this here was a good idea, but he wasn't online, so I thought... what's the big deal.

Yeah, that's alright in my book.
He/we can always delete it if we disapprove.

Furthermore I believe, the DriverPacks, nLite, RVM Integrator are somehow related wink

Indeed they are.
Just try keeping it to this very thread (if you intend to post update on that matter) as nLite only plays a minor part in the DriverPacks.

977

(10 replies, posted in Software)

Not sure whether it was posted on this Forum or elsewhere, but this link may help you out:
http://www.radarsync.com/vista/

kwin73 wrote:

muiz3 - i downloaded your driver package but i do not know how to unzip it. I tired winzip and winrar with no luck

Firstly, the DriverPacks do not have to get unpacked usually.

Secondly, if you still want to do that, use http://www.7-zip.org/.
It is OS, free and even more efficient than WinZip or WinRAR.

markymoo wrote:

Bâshrat the Sneaky if your program can detect for the presence of this folder QSC auto styly and delete it before slipsteaming this will get rid of the error.

The whole point of this folder is to act as a cache.
If it gets deleted each time you run the slipstreaming process, we could just do without QSC altogether.

muiz3 wrote:

Can you please post your HWIDS ?

Use the link in my sig to obtain them.

Twice is better than none! big_smile tongue

That looks a lot as if the disc cannot be properly read.
Try to check the disc for bad sectors (http://www.cdspeed2000.com/) or simply reburn it if rewritable (RW).

Also make sure the drive's lense is not scratched nor covered with dust etc.

Testing the ISO image in a VM is a good idea to verify the image itself is not borken (bad RAM, bad HDD etc.).

Have a look here ==> http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=960

This functionality is included in the new version of base 8.04.xx... see the home page.

Nah, of course not!

In that case, though, I'm sure you will notice the problems in the first phase of XP setup, as it's the Text mode drivers.
If they make problems for me, most of the time, I wasn't even able to see the HDD dedicated to get installed on, so no harm done.

Still, using an RW saves you a lot of headaches smile

I only burn my UWXPCD to an R once or twice a year (sort of a hard backup for you-never-know) and only when I'm 100% there are no problems.

No, NOT FIXABLE means exactly that, it is neyond our means to do anything about it (generally driver bug).
RESOLVED means it has been fixed by the DP Team so it works as intended now.

CLOSED simply means the thread/case is closed for whatever reason.
Can get reopened if applicable, though.

Fragbert wrote:

I rebuild each time when troubleshooting this, and it's unfortunate that you have to waste real DVD-R media rather than using VirtualPC wink (oh not really, DVD-R is $15 for a spool of 100, haha)

As Jaak has already pointed out and I cannot stress this often enough:
The use of Rewritable (also commonly known as [b]RW[/]) media will entirely circumvent this problem as the discs can be re-used up to 1,000 times while costing maybe 1.5x times that of a wite-once medium.
It doesn't take that much to figure out which is the better deal in the (not so) long run, moreso when virtually every CD/DVD writer suports that format.

In any case, testing the ISO file in a VM before burning can save you some trouble, moreso when you do not have a dedicated testing system you can rely on for installation.
Nothing worse than trying to reinstall your main rig only to find out you made some little but stupid mistake that means you will have to do it all over. hmm

987

(33 replies, posted in Other)

Title updated and *STICKIED* since this wasn't the first time I saw someone ask for this smile

Floppy wrote:

""Installations took at least ten minutes less ""

What Installations, the program itself (VMWare)? or instaling WinXp for testing purpose?

The latter I would assume.
Really, how often do you (re-)install the VM?
Unless it takes several days to do so, that is really negligible.
But if you come to think about how often you (or we at least) install some test version of XP inside the VM, then it actually does matter, even if it's "just" ten minutes less smile

Just as a sinde note:
You cannot test this specific issue in VPC since it does not emulate your actual hardware.
Instead, it will use generic ones for which drivers are provided through the VPC AddOns!

lightsout wrote:

I wouldn't call Parallels a big player, I believe VMWare has 80% or so of the virtualisation market. smile

I can't give you actual figures, but from my perception they are indeed rather big - at least big enough to be mentioned on the topic of Virtual Machines wink

Oh, and they definately have a big share of Mac Virtualisation I am sure!

Bâshrat the Sneaky wrote:

The reason for stickying this topic is simple: Virtual PC 2007 is completely free. And it's less limited than VMWare player. That alone should be enough IMO.

That, and the reason I provided linkage to the other two is so that users still have a free choice what to pick smile

The best is usually to test as many as possible and then choce whatever you like best!

Will do!

I try to stick around and read as much as possible (mind you, I will also have to moderte one thread or another wink), but sometimes, things may slip past me hmm

jtdoom wrote:

It is a testing platform of sorts, and I used the beta with satisfaction.

Same here, and even the RC was nice.
Good to see it moved to final now, whatever that means with MS smile


Of course, you can also use VMWare which also supports your physically present USb devices, however, I found VPC to somehow work out better and faster for me.

The thrid big player in the Virtual Machine business is Parallels, however, they merely have a free trial version up.
OTOH, you can also run this on a Mac wink

muiz3 wrote:

And as far as i know we dont support that tool

Yes, we do!
AFAIK, this tool from Patje is what Bâshrat the Sneaky used to make the DriverPack Graphics A compatible with mobile cards.


Anyway, A Murder of Crows, have you already tried installing on your machine using DriverPack Graphics A or are you just asking in case of?

Because, ususally, the preferred method is to try it out first, then, when problems arise, come in here and complain/ask for help wink

Yeah, yeah, here I am smile

muiz3 wrote:

Very good ! , but would you please remove the first post , the one without the code tags.
Just put "removed" there.
Or put the code tags in that post and remove the hwids one from the last post.
You can use "edit"

its at the bottom of your post "Report | Edit | Quote"

I took the liberty of removing all now obsolete posts from the thread so as to allow a more structured discussion.
Hopefully, you don't mind smile

Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't check whether that one actually did pin point to the driver files or not.
In that case, do as muiz told you!

Que?

Please speak English only in here!

boomservequake wrote:

I've sent a e-mail at admin@driverpacks.net whit these new drivers for Cmi Ac97.

Now, that is the completely wrong approach, I'm sorry to say.

In fact, request are only to be posted in the appropriate sub-forums.
You did it right in your second post where you included the DL link.

Your links are all broken!

1,000

(4 replies, posted in Software)

I'm ususally using a seperate testing rig for the task, however, that always means I am limited to testing the HW that's in there.

Before giving it the real go, I will test in VPC, though - just to verify there are no generic, non-driver-specific errors.

If you want to test it on your main machine I can only suggest getting a swappable HDD rack for the task so you can take out the working HDD(s) with all your data on it and put in a testing HDD only.
That way you will not endure dataloss should something go wrong and you can still test it on your very HW it is supposed to run properly on later.
Definately beats using just a second parition because it will leave the MBR unaltered.


Oh, and while we're at it, MS has justreleased the final version of VPC 2007!
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta … c0b40a73b6