you seem to have a HWID that is not included.
here is the list we have...

[N-6]
ms_count=1
ms_1_deviceName="NVIDIA nForce 630 SATA Controller (AHCI)"
ms_1_tag="nvgts6"
ms_1_sysFile="nvgts6.sys"
ms_1_hwids="PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554&CC_0106,PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554&SUBSYS_B0021458&REV_A2"
ms_1_isBusExtender=false
ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k"

Please, if you can, provide a link to the driver that you know works for this device...

the one on Nvidia's site doesn't contain your HWID i belive it is the one in the pack too...

the drivers on the shuttle site are for vista only (and they also do not contain this HWID)

on the surface the HWID seems to have been altered by Shuttle perhaps check your BIOS version.
the HWID should be like PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554 (or PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0558 for RAID mode)

have a great day, and it is a pleasure to have you here.

@team this driver has been modified (the .sys file was renamed ? this is not necessary)
and the INI section is not complete. it should read.

[N-6]
ms_count=2
ms_1_deviceName="NVIDIA nForce 630 SATA Controller (AHCI)"
ms_1_tag="nvgts6"
ms_1_sysFile="nvgts6.sys"
ms_1_hwids="PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554&CC_0106,PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554&SUBSYS_B0021458&REV_A2"
ms_1_isBusExtender=false
ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k"
ms_2_deviceName="NVIDIA nForce 630 SATA Controller (RAID)"
ms_2_tag="NVRD326"
ms_2_sysFile="NVRD326.sys"
ms_2_hwids="PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0558&CC_0104"
ms_2_isBusExtender=true
ms_2_exc_disableIfOS="w2k"

@Dyehouse1

if you dare you can try this and report back.
help can be found here --> Can I make a custom mass storage pack?


[N-6]
ms_count=2
ms_1_deviceName="NVIDIA nForce 630 SATA Controller (AHCI)"
ms_1_tag="nvgts6"
ms_1_sysFile="nvgts6.sys"
ms_1_hwids="PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554&CC_0106,PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0554&SUBSYS_B0021458&REV_A2,PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0550"
ms_1_isBusExtender=false
ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k"
ms_2_deviceName="NVIDIA nForce 630 SATA Controller (RAID)"
ms_2_tag="NVRD326"
ms_2_sysFile="NVRD326.sys"
ms_2_hwids="PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0558&CC_0104,PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0560"
ms_2_isBusExtender=true
ms_2_exc_disableIfOS="w2k"

4,427

(76 replies, posted in News)

Welcome aboard!

in as much as SP3 is being released so will the RC for base
that was its main function was to support xp sp3.

there is a lot more i have been working on in the code but little of it will be seen.
i fixed the proxy problem and streamlined the uninstall routines (prep stage).
and have further modularized routines. 

the finisher issue is related to the fact we have been rearanging all of the packs folder structures.
the finisher uses hard coded folders. that needs to be addressed still.

thanks for reporting it. good reporting leads to a better DriverPacks

4,428

(2 replies, posted in DriverPack WLAN)

did you install the DriverPacks with dp-base?

try the fix listed above

4,430

(17 replies, posted in Software)

Hello! Glad to help but... you gave almost no useful details to go on.

well you don't need any drivers in a virtual machine... so of course none are installed.
that sounds like its working perfect. no drivers needed none installed ???

if you need help then we need the minimum details

the info needed is outlined in "read before you post" in my signature.

thanks twig,

It's so awesome the way you keep the 3rd party DriverPack's organized and indexed.

it is a job - and like so many of the things we do, is in danger of not being appreciated for the work that it is.

i was thinking that i wished i could do something to reward you
and it hit me - how about some recognition and a new tool for your arsenal.

Jeff

all i did was point you in a good direction - you made the journey

shoot the HWID's at us and we will have a look see...

the main question is... did that fix your issue??? your getting .net installed now?

i dont think i have seen that question a lot. but if it comes up we'll use your post for starting the FAQ.

4,435

(74 replies, posted in Vista-Tool)

i am getting my head wrapped around the idea...

the main problem is there are only like three drivers for xpsp2 or higher.

its nice if you want to run nt4

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2106

galepo has a tool that may just save your bacon ...

4,438

(29 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)

You may have some wiggle room there - I am not certain - I'm sure that someone will clarify for us...

forum rule: English is required for posting, my apologies.

Thanks smile

(you have been around long enough to know the routine without us asking ;P wink )

So far, the only idea I can come up with is to restore it onto an IDE drive, install all the drivers for the changed hardware, including the RAID controller, create a new image from this machine and restore it to the SATA RAID. This seems pretty long winded and time consuming, so if I can get BESR to recognise the RAID that'd be great.

yes what you said.

I thought the old machine was still running in which case half the work is done already.

4,442

(29 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)

yes each os has a higher limit than its successor - we have been aware of that for quite a while.

however if you use the 2003 in place of the XP file
Then you are in violation of the MS Licensing agreement. (unless you want to buy a 2003 license for your XP)
So we cannot recomend that people do that.

http://tracker.ryanvm.net/rss has the .net torrent links.

I don't think your post is off topic .net might be part or all of his problem too.

so
1 image related
2 .net related
3 KB883667 related

4,444

(38 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

wink tongue

you are mistaken about #3 sir...

the $1 folder is COPIED to the local HDD during text mode

yes they are "installed" during PE (GUI setup), but that was not what i said was it? Nor was it my my point.
Please read more carefully.
it was about copying them from the source over the network to the destination that i was referencing.

my first method copies 300 meg in text mode.
(This may be our only choice if the NIC were not supported by PE prior to presetup and before the driverpacks installation occurs.)

my second method copies 300 meg in 32 bit mode and it extracts them on the fly utilizing resources that would be unused / idle on the target machine.

your method copies 1.5 gig in text mode.


I guarantee both of my methods are faster and reduce the size of your network copy by 1.2 gig.


#4 dspdisabler = Driver Signing Policy Dis-abler your unattended line will not help (by itself) if you use KTD.

#6 if you want to try and impress me your not going to do it by listing your accomplishments. I made my first dial-up connection in 1968 with an acoustic modem from a dumb terminal to a mainframe computer. I started learning on that mainframe.  My first PC was a KIT i had to assemble and we are talking about component level assembly not plugging cards in a slot. (it was a Poly88)

I didn't ask you what you did because i wanted to be taught. I asked you to see if i could offer some help. Sometimes when i see how people fail or choose poorly it helps me, in that i can potentialy avoid issues when i am programming. that way i can do error trapping to prevent them from making bad choices.

PS i am one of the coders for the base program and personally wrote the bartpe plugin
You may not be a good programmer but I am, and I have over 30 years practice.

#7 WPI (windows post installer) {what you planned to share} has already been done, and quite well i might add.
i also have over a hundred programs that are automated. So does every one else in the world...
at least the ones capable of finding there way here. wink

90% of the members / users here are hardened veterans with decades of experience, each and every one.
There are no noobs here. you are running with people here who have at least as much experience as you do.

We look forward to seeing you... big_smile
We're glad your here and giving back to the community you obviously love.

have a great day sir!

HWID for device please...

4,447

(38 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

c:\windows\

4,448

(3 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)

the only reason i can think of is that you did not have as many packs selected.

If you select all of the packs, and use method one, you will always get this message.

The path length has been in excess of this limit for years, if all the packs are selected.

Yes I have been thinking about RIS and SysPrep support for a while
feedback of this nature is the road to making it happen.

in a network install the $OEM$ folder is still used however the layout is a little different.

instead of the layout drive:\$OEM$
it uses the layout \folder\I386\$OEM$

IE the OEM folder becomes a subfolder of I386 instead of being in the root of the disk.

check out the other post your following
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2473