OK, that is fixable too... ![]()
3,126 2008-11-15 15:01:34
Re: ICH10R and Windows 2000 (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
3,127 2008-11-14 20:32:09
Re: ICH10R and Windows 2000 (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
not enough memory to load ntfs is an error generated by trying to load too many drivers at one time...
if you enable a driver for win2k then you must disable at least one other...
(useing the mass storage INI setting disable if OS = )
either Jake missed adding the tag... or you enabled one that was disabled
3,128 2008-11-14 07:09:56
Re: WdfCoInstaller<XXX>.dll (1 replies, posted in Other)
if you don't know the answer then you should not be fooling with it... ![]()
leave it as is...
the short answer is if you change anything at all (includeing editing the inf) you will break driver signing and it will then not be installed.
3,129 2008-11-13 12:04:53
Re: [Solved] Finisher (Base 8.05~8.11.02) doesn't always clean up properly (6 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Hi,
i try installation with DriverPacks BASE 8.09.rc1 and 8.10rc3 and driver are not deleted, i have D folder on C with all drivers extracted, and I see drivers pack finisher in first logon...
I try installation with french,arabic,chinesse,and spanish XP...
thanks for all
I stickied this so i will remember to do it...
thanks for reporting everyone... i can't fix it unless i know its broke... ![]()
Reporting is so very important!
Have a great day!
OK...
I have found the issue with the backup mechanisim for removing the \D\ folder
the line entered into the runonce key was
cmd.exe /c "if exist C:\D then rd /s /q C:\D"
"Then" is a valid Autoit syntax - but is not valid for CMD
this is corrected in the 'head' version and will be included in the next release...
3,130 2008-11-13 11:49:42
Re: Some thoughts about nForce massstorage drivers... (10 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
what version of base... and what version of mass storage?
3,131 2008-11-13 11:41:36
Re: driver pack finisher don't delete drivers (1 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=3230
Duplicate post closed.
3,132 2008-11-12 23:58:32
Re: [SLV] QL2300.SYS File not found (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
since that does seem to be the case... perhaps this will help you to help us
welcome aboard...
3,133 2008-11-12 17:46:12
Re: [SLV] QL2300.SYS File not found (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
this problem has already been reported by the testing team...
Use the official release...
its always nice to get feedback... thanks
3,134 2008-11-12 00:37:04
Re: DP Base [all versions] and the XP 'Repair' Option (55 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
yeah... i hear ya...
but it is an option...
one of these days someone will confirm or deny that the usb method works too, or not... or sometimes...
3,135 2008-11-12 00:15:24
Re: DP Base [all versions] and the XP 'Repair' Option (55 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
good points Level
you forgot to mention that a winnt.sif on a floppy takes precedece over the one on the CD/DVD.
so the simple way to have both is to have a winnt.sif or txtsetup.sif on a floppy that does not contain the [Unattended] section.
put the floppy in for attended
don't use it for full unattended
this is belived to also work for usb flash drive but this is unconfirmed...
3,136 2008-11-10 16:44:43
Re: Where are the latest betas? (11 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
how did you manage to have trouble getting mass storage to work... {scratches head}
i would love to hear more about your issue - please...
3,137 2008-11-09 20:03:23
Re: Where are the latest betas? (11 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
SI 3xxx series were fubar for an entire year...
SI 3112 for example conflicted with its own RAID and AHCI versions...
the list does not stop with these examples they are just a small cross section off the tops of our heads...
3,138 2008-11-09 19:58:01
Re: Possible fully silent installation with pre-set *.ini file ??? (35 replies, posted in Software)
when / how are you calling dpinst?
Well yes you are quite close to here... Howdy Neighbor!
3,139 2008-11-09 06:09:43
Re: Where are the latest betas? (11 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
They will be released when they are stable...
We DO NOT want people useing unstable packs in production.
What good is an updated driver if it crashes your machines...
Go with the older drivers that work... that is why we released them, they are stable
We are not about being current if the current drivers are BUGGED... and they are
when the providers get thier sh*t together then we will release them, and not before.
If you ahve an issue with a particular driver then report it...
since you have reported no bugs i can asume they are fine as is.
(having an older version number is not a bug - it's smart - because we don't cause problems for our users.)
we have doezens of people reporting bugs everyday with the test packs... we dont release bugged drivers and we never will.
if you are sad because we dont have any finals then complain to the providers (Please)
If they put out junk that is up to them but we won't pass those on in our packs...
what good is it to have the latest driver if it kills your (or someone elses) machine?
We are not about bragging rights (my driver is newer than your driver)
do you flash your bios on your PC just because they ahve a new version - if you do you're a bonehead
the only reason to do either of these things (new driver or new BIOS) is if You Are Actually Haveing an issue that the new driver fixes.
(please refer to the fact that you have not reported any issues - and therefore don't have any - and therefore an update is not required)
they will be made available to you when they are stable...
I, like you, also hope that will be very soon - but it wont happen until it's reliable.
That is in your best interest... and is why we have the following we have... we are reliable.
Be 'Cool' and don't use betas in production
3,140 2008-11-09 05:50:15
Re: Possible fully silent installation with pre-set *.ini file ??? (35 replies, posted in Software)
You're my kind of dude... never give up!
I really admire that ![]()
I see a few things i would make cleaner... like this
for %%i in ("%DPLoc%\winxp\2008\*.exe") do start /wait /high %%i /passive /Nostart
start /wait "%DPLoc%\winxp\2008\vb\VB6-KB946235-x86.exe" /Q
"%DPLoc%\install\_Antivirus\NAV\102\Symantec AntiVirus.msi" /QB
"%DPLoc%\Install\_av\_video\wmp\wmp11.exe" /Q
"%DPLoc%\Install\_av\decode\cole2k\SilentFiles\CPASetup.exe" /S
Long file names almost always need to be in Quote's...
the for line might need to be
for %%i in ("%DPLoc%\winxp\2008\*.exe") do start /wait /high "%%i" /passive /Nostart
let me know if that gets you any closer ![]()
3,141 2008-11-08 14:41:27
Re: Possible fully silent installation with pre-set *.ini file ??? (35 replies, posted in Software)
It is not possable to avoid a drive letter search after the initial reboot (in your case)
because the way your drive letters change we also can't do something simple like searching z~a instead of a~z
(which is the simple and obvious choice) because sometimes your ODD is first and sometimes it is last...
you can not perform a drive letter search because your bios will not allow us to correct for your issue.
- disabling the card readers is (should be) a bios function-
initialy assigning them in the same order as the OS will after the install may not be possable
not being able to disable is a BUG in the BIOS of the laptop and as such needs to be corrected by them...
they may even have a work around they recommend
- certainly they have to preload them at the factory
How do they do it???
Perhaps you can talk to someone in the config shop.
options
BIOS Fix from OEM
Insider secret from OEM config shop
Copy all files to laptop HDD during textmode
$OEM$\$1\ is copied to %SystemRoot% at textmode
Hint M1 uses $OEM$\$1\ folder... ![]()
useing this method your files will always be at %SystemRoot% and no drive letter search is needed at all...
put a disk in the readers!!!
There is a way to specificaly assign drive letters during the install but i do not remember the details...
It was somewhat complex.
It was somthing like - seeding a file that is normaly created during the install. that file containing a cache of the currently assigned drive letters. (hack the OS)
I dont know how much you make an hour but a new laptop that works is starting to look cheap
LOL
3,142 2008-11-08 13:23:09
Re: DP work geat when run at t-39, but not when called from WPI (14 replies, posted in Software)
That was Bâshrat the Sneaky's idea of a joke...
You would be surprized how many people don't get it.
But for those of us who do... LMAO 2 ![]()
I don't think i will change that lineever - at least not in the forseeable future ![]()
3,143 2008-11-08 12:54:24
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
it has nothing to do with the packs - Your I386 folder is corrupted
the OS File system is corrupted - not DriverPacks
you have orphaned entries in your dosnet and txtsetup files and probably a few more i can only guess at
I make a copy of my source just before i add DriverPacks... then if i want to make changes i make a new copy of the before DriverPacks folder. and i modify that copy then add DriverPacks. you could use the DriverPacks BASE to remove DriverPacks by selecting no packs to slipstream. I wouldn't - I would do as i indicated make a new copy of my pre DriverPacks folder.
so AGAIN you dont have a DriverPacks issue - you have a corrupted I386 folder (corrupted source)
you need to copy the files off a Install CD and re add all your updates and patches and nLite whatever
This is your "clean" source...
then copy that clean source folder -
and add DriverPacks to the copy.
if you need to do updates or whatever make another copy of your "clean" source.
if you ONLY need to update DriverPacks then you can reuse the previous DriverPacks folder.
if you need to change anything else except DriverPacks then you need to use a fresh copy of the Clean source...
or use DriverPacks BASE to remove DriverPacks
- note: YOU CAN'T REMOVE DriverPacks FROM A CORRUPTED SOURCE ![]()
- You also cannot successfully remove DriverPacks if your I386 folder is modified after DriverPacks is installed
(because this will orphan any added files or servicepacks or any other changes
when DriverPacks BASE restores the backup files it created before you made the changes,
and once they are orphaned you have garbage.
and if the backups DriverPacks creates are not found the files will get orphaned and this also destroys your copy)
you need to START OVER from Scratch - and don't modify a source after you add DriverPacks - or you will be starting over again!
3,144 2008-11-08 12:02:18
Re: Current location of nightlies? (5 replies, posted in Software)
guess i should have mentiond that the links were Stickied in the 'testing team' forum... ![]()
I just ... ahem... Assumed (drat) that you would look
![]()
3,145 2008-11-08 11:48:14
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
from your log above
2008-11-01 07:50:01 : <PREP> Neither txtsetup.org or dosnet.org was found. The removal of
2008-11-01 07:50:01 : <PREP> any Service Packs we may have added with Driverpacks was skipped
Both of these files would be created when M2 was installed
so since m2 was installed
(your log 2008-11-01 07:50:02 : <PREP> Replaced original setup: method 2 was used previously.)
and these files were not found you now have junk...
you can't modify the files after DriverPacks (except to update DriverPacks) if you do, you willcorrupt your source (and you did).
Your log does not lie - i am not going to debate this with you...
i have given you the answer
Your source is Corrupted, Junk, Toast, fried, spent, gone, done, history...
Start over. i can't make it any clearer than that...
3,146 2008-11-08 01:26:10
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
VMware does not load any drivers...
so it is not that...
according to your log your source is corupted... did you use a clean one?
IE it found M2 setup.exe but no backup files for txtsetup or wnnt.sif or dosnet
Therefore your source is no longer valid...
the fact that vmware fails (which requires no drivers) backs up this theory.
3,147 2008-11-08 00:25:47
Re: Current location of nightlies? (5 replies, posted in Software)
a long overdue upgrade... Welcome to the testing team sir!
3,148 2008-11-07 18:14:25
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2A02
it is in DriverPack Graphics B http://www.driverpacks.net/DriverPacks/ … php?pag=gb
we moved the drivers around in the packs last time around
check the supported devices list
http://www.driverpacks.net/DriverPacks/ … php?pag=gb
3,149 2008-11-07 12:44:33
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
DPs_BASE.log and HWID's ?
3,150 2008-11-07 12:26:14
Re: [SLVD] Graphics C 8.10.2 - Geforce4 MX 440 Problem (13 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
not a new problem ![]()
I say don't break signing unless we are forced to...
If PnP works as designed then the proper driver should win out over a similar driver with similar or possably even identical HWID's
Obviously we don't live in that world... so let's shoot for the moon... and then break signing on a as needed basis...
if we are trying to replace a native driver we MUST do it with a signed driver
- or at least that is the result we see reported quite often
- thinking out loud... this may be the cause of certain BSOD @ winpe (the 7B)...
mass storage signing becomes a factor at PE
We should make a note of the reason when we break signing...
although i dont know where the best place to record such info would be...
perhaps in teh deited copy of the INF? - perhaps on the forum? - something else i have not thoujght of???