2,901

(1 replies, posted in Hardware)

Try ours!

Not all installs use winnt.sif (mine do).  But this looks like a promising alternative to GUIrunonce and ROE.

2,903

(1 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)

No, it's by design.

2,904

(8 replies, posted in Feature Requests)

That's actually not a bad idea.  I don't know however the best way to implement it.

LOL! big_smile
You've got all your updates running at the same time!  And your CDROM variable isn't declared properly.  No wonder they're failing.
I use the following code and it works fine for me.  Just make sure your installers are all in the %CDROM%\Runonceex\* directory!
You need to change your code to read:

@echo off
title= Adding programs to runonceexe
echo Adding programs to runonceexe
FOR %%i IN (D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z) DO IF EXIST %%i:\win51 SET CDROM=%%i:

SET KEY=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx

REG ADD %KEY% /V TITLE /D "Ultima botta" /f

REG ADD %KEY%\900 /VE /D "NET_3.5-SP1+LP_ITA+updates..." /f
REG ADD %KEY%\900/V 1 /D "%CDROM%\Runonceex\dotNET_3.5-SP1+LangPackITA+updates.exe" /f
REG ADD %KEY%\901 /VE /D "NET Patches" /f
REG ADD %KEY%\901 /V 1 /D "%CDROM%\Runonceex\WindowsXP-KB961118-x86-ITA.exe /quiet /norestart" /f
REG ADD %KEY%\902 /VE /D "Wallpaper" /f
REG ADD %KEY%\902 /V 1 /D "%CDROM%\Runonceex\personalwallpaper.exe" /f
REG ADD %KEY%\903 /VE /D "EULA batch" /f
REG ADD %KEY%\903 /V 1 /D "%CDROM%\Runonceex\uela.bat" /f

EXIT

The reference for this info is here: http://unattended.msfn.org/unattended.x … ad54c7b3c/

newsposter wrote:

c) don't use the same screen name more than 2 times

Oh, I am so screwed! wink

<sigh>
@NewsAndHistory,
OK, XP-64 has been deemed an inferior OS by this websites' administrators, moderators, team-members, staff, and the majority of our visitors.  That is our opinion.
The folks that do all the work around here have made the decision to ignore that OS because we feel it is not worth our efforts to develop for.
You obviously disagree.
Fine.
Spewing vitriol in our direction is NOT going to win you any friends, win you any arguments, or win our support.

I would suggest that you search for XP-64 drivers elsewhere.  You will not find them here.
I would also suggest that since you feel XP-64 is a worthwhile platform, then you can devote your spare time to learn about drivers in general (we will be helpful in that regard), and 64-bit ones in detail (again, not here).  Then you can develop your own "DriverPacks" for your XP-64 faithful followers.  There are definitely a few of you out there.

But be warned.  Any future inappropriate outbursts or personal attacks will get you banned...swiftly.

Welcome to DriverPacks.  Enjoy your stay.

2,908

(4 replies, posted in Vista-Tool)

Very nice!  smile

And he can't read either...

2,910

(3 replies, posted in Windows 7 Discussion)

I know!  Usually M$ kills the RC's after maybe 6-months.  A one year period is unheard of.
I like it! big_smile

Read BEFORE you post

2,912

(8 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)

Cosmin3 wrote:

I searched this forum for "iastor.sys" and it says "Your search returned no hits."...

That's impossible.  I did the exact same search here and got 2 pages of returns.  You might have misspelled "iastor.sys".

2,913

(35 replies, posted in Windows 7 Discussion)

After using Win7 beta for the past few months, I can honestly say that I'll be ditching both XP and Vista for good once it goes final.  I've been tolerating Vista ever since I've built my primary quad-core tower.  Win7 just flies on this!  And Win7 is faster than XP on my aging notebook.
I can't wait! big_smile

Nice!
Any site admin want to chime in here?

2,915

(6 replies, posted in DriverPack Sound)

Moved to 'Sound' forum and added [REQ].

2,916

(35 replies, posted in Windows 7 Discussion)

Not exactly.
The way I understand the article, this will be an extension of the OS.  It won't be an entire XP OS running in a window like VPC.  You can select an app to run in compatibility mode for XP, then it will run in it's own memory space with a different set of system files/libraries then the main OS.  Similar to how WINE has been doing it in linux for years.

2,917

(353 replies, posted in Software)

Awesome!  That should trim about 500 entries from the Sound DriverPacks! big_smile

2,918

(353 replies, posted in Software)

Ooh, is there a way to filter out x64 strings in the "OS Arch" column?
ie, anything with "*AMD64*" or "*IA64*" doesn't get listed. 
Creative is notorious for including i386, x86, AMD64, IA64, and generic all in the same .inf!

2,919

(15 replies, posted in DriverPack WLAN)

Go for it dude!  You're on fire!
big_smile

Geez, a little late aren't we? tongue

2,921

(10 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)

OverFlow wrote:

It is better to be safe than sorry...

So now we are BOTH "safe" AND "sorry" tongue

2,922

(7 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

roll
Still waiting for the answers to the rest of my questions...

2,923

(7 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)

drive-alec wrote:

i have a toshiba satellite A205-S5000 laptop,i downgraded to xp,and i need where to find the display driver for this product.i searched every where but i couldn't find any.please somebody help me.

Did you even try the DriverPacks? 
Read the post in my signature "read before you post".
Please post your DPsFnshr.log in two posts since it's too big for a single post (or email to me) and your DPs_BASE.log.

Normally, we require positive test results from at least three of our testing team members for any changed drivers.  Any negative tests takes us back to the drawing board.
For example, DriverPack Sound A, we've significantly changed how we package the Creative drivers, and it's causing problems for some users.  That explains somewhat the delay between releases.

We can release DriverPacks once a year/month/week...but why bother with updated drivers if they will only cause you more problems? wink
Stability is our primary goal, not currency.
We have no set schedule.  They'll be done when they're done. smile

Wow, lots of questions here.  I'll try to catch them all.
The Radeon 48xx series isn't covered by the 812 release of DriverPack Graphics A.  But it IS supported in our nightly testing builds.  And very stable too. smile
I own an Asus Xonar DX (very nice!) and it also is supported in our nightly test builds.  Although looking at our release page, it seems we haven't updated the sound DriverPacks in almost a year.  Shame on us!
DriverPack Graphics C is our 'Catch all' graphics dp and gets all the outdated/obsolete drivers.  We are planning on moving all the drivers that haven't been updated for several years into an 'Archive' dp.  But that's some time down the road yet.
HWID overlap is OK within a vendor's driver range.  But we work hard to eliminate any overlap between vendors.  That's bad.
The ATI HDMI audio driver is in the audio DriverPacks. wink

Thanks for reading, and enjoy your stay at DriverPacks.net.