Major - you are on the testing team, are you not? then it seems silly for me to have to ask you for your HWID's doesnt it?
5,176 2007-05-20 02:46:52
Re: Found new hardware during RunOnceEx (21 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
5,177 2007-05-20 02:32:59
Re: pci simple communication controller - Problem (2 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
We dont need or use descriptions of devices. we need (all of) your HWID's. Use the below link to obtain them.
Create a new post in the correct forum (Chipset, Mass Storage, LAN, or whatever is appropriate for the request) with the title starting our as [REQ] - request for new driver to be added.
And a link to the driver that is the correct one for your platform.
PS the HWID you refer to seems to be for your 1394 adapter. (try the 1394 adapter drivers from the Manufaturer)
5,178 2007-05-20 02:20:49
Re: NTFS.sys (1 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
my suggestion would be replace the file (NTFS.sys) that is being reported as damaged with a known good version (possably from a working installation) and try again.
(PS Nlite may be modifying this file so don't run nlite after you replace it)
5,179 2007-05-18 16:51:32
Re: DPsBASE AutoIt Error (8 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
problem solved posting patch now
5,180 2007-05-18 16:35:01
Re: DPsBASE AutoIt Error (8 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
I'll get right on it.
it shouldn't be tough!
5,181 2007-05-18 11:38:44
Re: [REQ] NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S + 430 chipset (23 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
that will help except he has no video then...
mass needs added minimum and lan will remain as a problem till i get a little farther on the support of that
5,182 2007-05-16 15:18:42
Re: Update checker asks "Where did you get that?" (9 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Jtdoom found an error in one of the PHP files on the server this problem should be gone now!
5,183 2007-05-16 15:13:59
Re: [NEEDS REPLY] [sysprep] Can't find DPSfinisher.exe (20 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
you answered your own question yes you did! DevPath.exe C:\
5,184 2007-05-16 12:10:07
Topic: DriverPacks BASE updated to 7.05 - Oops - make that 7.05.2 (3 replies, posted in News)
The 7.05.2 release fixes an error when slipstreaming a disk platform using Method One
a path issue / bug was reported in the following thread
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 036#p11036
The 7.05.1 Release fixes an undeclared variable error / bug that occured when useing method 1.
Reported by users mario_buc and Xusen.
The 7.05 Release adds a function to create a redistributable Plugin for bartPE and addresses some Profile issues that occured when switching from one platform to another (IE Disk to BartPE or Multi to Disk ect...). We have also updated Thai language support - Thanks to SoKoOLz.
New in this release:
- Thai language support (SoKoOLz).
- Some additional language updates
- BartPE redistributable plugin Creator (OverFlow)
- Cleaned up some GUI page profile issues
- Open sourceing of the ability of advanced team members to release DriverPacks and Base. (Bâshrat the Sneaky)
This is my first attempt at a release so if I missed something Please point it out (nicely ).
Changes to all Platforms
=====================
Resolved a pre-existing condition (traced back to at least version 6086)
This condition would present the wrong page profiles if someone clicked the next button when an invalid folder was selected.
IE if a valid "Disk" location was set and the user swiched to bartpe and then clicked next, all the packs would be selectable, and they are not supported and won't work... yet! Also if "Multi" was selected and then the user switched back to disk strange things would display. (Cleaned up some gui profile issues.)
Changes to BartPE
=====================
The Base should should now create a "vanilla" plugin if textmode is unchecked and the base is run from outside the BartPE folder structure. This would be helpful as it would create a stand alone plugin with generic settings that could be dropped into any BartPE plugin folder and then be configureable from the PEBuilder plugin configuration screen. Remember in order to create the initial plugin it is better not to have the base program in the bartpe folder (but probably will work fine if this was done)
A "vanilla" plugin can be dropped into the \bartpeprogram\plugin folder of ubcd4win or any other bartpe build.
(so it creates a \[bartpeprogram]\plugin\Driverpacks.net folder) and then it would be configureable from the plugin page in pebuilder by pressing <Config>.
The Base should create a fully configured and funtional BartPE Textmode plugin if the Textmode box is checked. (default setting)
===========================
As always, there are many people who contribute their time and resources to this project, all of whom make this possable.
Just because their names did not appear in this list (and I am sorry if I missed you) doesn't mean their efforts are not appreciated. This is a team effort and all of the team members deserve a HUGE Thank You !
The driver packs team, lead by Muiz, has been tirelessly adding new drivers.
The language team has been adding corrections and new languages.
THe UBCD4win Team has been an indispensable asset to my success with BartPE.
5,185 2007-05-16 06:58:13
Re: OPEN: Windows Vista support [APPROVED] (88 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
millenium edition is there too.... but...
I'm reverting yet another laptop loaded with Vista to XP for a customer that just hates Vista.
5,186 2007-05-15 16:09:00
Re: OPEN: Windows Vista support [APPROVED] (88 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
I'm not thinking that you did disagree - i think you agreed :-P
5,187 2007-05-12 13:49:03
Re: [request] API interaction with WinBuilder Projects (10 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Bâshrat the Sneaky reference to the branch was an offer to let you add your functionality to the base itself.
by making a separate branch it would allow for simultanious development without preventing releases from happening if one or the other team was not ready.
if you wish to provide your stand-alone application that simply uses the packs themselves looks like you have full support of Bâshrat the Sneaky and the team.
PS. You might have sold BartPE short. It certainly can be fully customized and automated.
UBCD4Win is an excellent example of that.
5,188 2007-05-11 19:46:38
Re: [request] API interaction with WinBuilder Projects (10 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
You can count on me. I'll help anyway can.
I want to do vista but I think it's still a little to raw to invest a great deal of time on.
I have been waiting for SP1 before taking the plunge.
5,189 2007-05-11 08:41:31
Re: Anyone having problems with DVDR/W (8 replies, posted in Other)
you forgot to mention that the surface of cheap cdrw and dvdrw can delaminate as a result of the type and quality of the varnish that is used on the upper surface.
I'm glad you guys had so much fun with this thread.
@helmi - I deliberately did not get technical on this subject, but i'm glad you did =P
5,190 2007-05-09 23:53:50
Re: Cannot download the 2 DriverPack Massstorage & DriverBase (4 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
there are some security mesures in place please try with IE and without download assistance programs.
(we check for referers)
5,191 2007-05-09 17:26:53
Re: [HOWTO] create a drivers-only disc (33 replies, posted in Other)
Quite simple to do
Just create a CD useing method 1
PS its over 300 meg useing method 2 and around 500 useing method 1 with all packs selected.
PPS You can put the cab compressed drivers that are in the $OEM$ folder after method 1 on a CD by themselves for what you want, furthermore, fully extracting the drivers from the 7zip archives will result in over 1 gig of drivers.
5,192 2007-05-05 05:02:07
Re: [IN PROGRESS] Uniform UXPCD page on MSFN? (6 replies, posted in Site & Forum Issues And Feedback)
nope.. that link is not accessable to me either.
5,193 2007-05-05 04:38:48
Re: [SOLVED]Two questions (4 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
The folder OEM is deliberately named - It implies that it is to be copied to the windows installation drive.
The same as the $OEM$ folder windows uses, however, we extract the archives from the OEM folder, not copy it, so it is similar yet quite different. The name OEM is therefore very descriptive and obviously deliberate to an experienced tech.
the mass storage archive also exists in OEM because the text mode versions of drivers are often very limited and are designed to be used only for partitioning and copying (as the name implies during text mode portion of set up only) and are usually not the full drivers that are actually used when plug and play loads for the windows OS.
The mass storage drivers in the OEM folder are the complete driver installations that windows requires to operate at full efficiency.
The only stupid question is the one never asked!
5,194 2007-05-05 04:01:24
Re: Anyone having problems with DVDR/W (8 replies, posted in Other)
rewriteables use a more malleable metalic surface and it is suseptable to deforming or not holding the imprint as well or for as long.
This characteristic must exist in order to make it eraseable.
It also makes it harder to get a good write and less likely to hold for long periods.
the surface tends to flatten itself over time especialy if not kept cool.
Ever microwave a cd for a couple of seconds? - [not good for the microwave, but fun to watch]
5,195 2007-05-04 08:41:33
Re: OPEN: Windows Vista support [APPROVED] (88 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
I got intrigued and did some looking around for some stats that weren't just pulled out of thin air.
http://www.seopher.com/articles/operati … a_forecast
How things look currently
Last month (November 2006) the market looked as below:
WinXP W2000 Win98 WinNT W2003 Linux Mac
74.9% 8.0% 1.0% 0.4% 1.8% 3.3% 3.5%
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2007/May/os.php
OS Stats
Sun Apr 1 00:01:01 2007 - Mon Apr 30 23:58:00 2007 30.0 Days
1. Windows XP 62906825 (82%)
2. Win 2000 4840441 (6%)
3. Mac 3280936 (4%)
4. Win 98 2012642 (2%)
5. Win NT 1742648 (2%)
6. Unknown 1004756 (1%)
7. Linux 337120 (0%)
8. Win 3.x 79696 (0%)
9. Unix 30412 (0%)
10. Win 95 26111 (0%)
11. WebTV 17982 (0%)
12. Windows ME 1819 (0%)
13. OS/2 1337 (0%)
14. Windows Vista 46 (0%)
15. Amiga 41 (0%)
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
OS Platform Statistics
Windows XP is the most popular operating system. The windows family counts for nearly 90%:
2007 WinXP W2000 Win98 Vista W2003 Linux Mac
March 76.7% 7.2% 0.8% 1.9% 1.9% 3.4% 3.6%
February 76.1% 7.4% 0.8% 1.2% 1.9% 3.5% 3.8%
January 76.1% 7.7% 0.9% 0.6% 1.9% 3.6% 3.8%
2006 WinXP W2000 Win98 WinNT W2003 Linux Mac
December 75.7% 7.9% 0.9% 0.2% 1.9% 3.6% 3.8%
November 74.9% 8.0% 1.0% 0.3% 1.9% 3.5% 3.6%
October 74.6% 8.9% 1.2% 0.3% 2.0% 3.5% 3.6%
September 74.6% 9.2% 1.4% 0.3% 2.0% 3.5% 3.6%
August 74.4% 10.1% 1.4% 0.3% 2.1% 3.5% 3.6%
July 74.3% 10.1% 1.5% 0.3% 2.0% 3.4% 3.6%
June 74.1% 10.6% 1.6% 0.3% 2.0% 3.4% 3.6%
May 74.2% 10.7% 1.6% 0.2% 2.0% 3.4% 3.6%
April 74.0% 11.2% 1.8% 0.3% 1.9% 3.3% 3.6%
March 72.9% 11.9% 2.0% 0.3% 1.8% 3.4% 3.5%
February 73.3% 12.3% 2.1% 0.3% 1.8% 3.4% 3.6%
January 72.3% 13.1% 2.4% 0.3% 1.7% 3.3% 3.5
Browser Statistics Month by Month
2007 IE7 IE6 IE5 Fx Moz S O
March 18.0% 38.7% 2.0% 31.8% 1.3% 1.7% 1.6%
February 16.4% 39.8% 2.5% 31.2% 1.4% 1.7% 1.5%
January 13.3% 42.3% 3.0% 31.0% 1.5% 1.7% 1.5%
so it looks like you guys might be right Vista users have tripled since january!
of course 3 x .6 is still less than 2% which means about as many people are useing Vista as are still useing Windows 98
and one site reported 62,000,000 million users for XP - 2,000,000 million for 98 and 46 (4 dozen) for Vista.
(heck even win 95 still had 26,000 thousand users (although it puzzels me they even got on the net ))
I'm still with hilander we can wait till sp1 is out for Vista (after they are are done being sued by Lucent and the DRM gets flushed down the toilet.) and they have to totaly rewrite the core / kernel and have a 600 meg patch.
ROFL
I would like to point out here I have hated the initial release of every windows operating system that ever came out
and yes I mean starting with windows (before it even had a version) nov of 1983 - tried it - hated it - used dos 2 instead
(I long for the simplicity of dos 3.3)
5,196 2007-05-04 08:21:40
Re: Driver installation Using Vendor ID`s (19 replies, posted in Other)
I didnt see the directory ???
5,197 2007-05-04 08:20:27
Re: Anyone having problems with DVDR/W (8 replies, posted in Other)
the rewritable media are not as reliable as WORM media. That is not unusual.
Never put backups or info you wish to store for long periods on rewritable.
5,198 2007-05-04 05:34:41
Re: OPEN: Windows Vista support [APPROVED] (88 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
@ muiz - i guess its done then - lol
- thanks Bâshrat the Sneaky i guess i missed the in his post
5,199 2007-05-03 07:47:58
Re: Hardware Universal Ghost Image (28 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
I think te answer is obvious.
with a new install everything is created specificaly to the platform you installed on.
when you use an image the creation process is already done, and won't be done again.
perhaps RIS is your answer?
when I use ghost images I create a ghost image for each platform.
5,200 2007-05-03 07:19:58
Re: OPEN: Windows Vista support [APPROVED] (88 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
After we get the 64 bit drivers for XP and 2003
which we havent even started yet - my guess is 2008
or if hilander is right and vista flops like ME did then never