np muiz, others might test it (or actually, not notice it is no longer issue, and never post)
sad

Hi
the finisher log is found in windows folder.

hi
DP LAN 704 should fix this issue
(the L\NV\123 folder and filename error was fixed)

did you add them to the INI yourself when you spotted that?

that would have done the trick, you know....

I did not know that muiz, and wondered how it got that way.

Now, at least I know how I got one in that form. In other words, I found the reason.
The current official release has the ini in that name standard, and new base will need it with the un-abbreviated name.
to me, mystery is solved.
still, I missed where the info about the change was posted, and apologise for that error.

(soon as the new releases are up, these few test versions still published on rapidshare are gonna be pulled)

easy, hit email link under my avatar

hi
next release will have that in s\r\1

hi, next release will have that in s\r\2

I have a new INI/INF I would like to upload to you, but, no adress

can you hit mine?

I'll have a look

the way you did that, erm, what about the newer HWIDs?

in a fresh unpacked UBCD4win I do find a folder where that file is in...
We are testing the DPs_Base bartPE plugin for UBCD4WIN, and that mass storage folder is not used in our tests.

fragbert??
did you test the test pack I put on rapidshare?

(I ask cuz your post says these drivers, and I cannot figure out wether you tested the nightly.)

yep, it wasn't smart, and I won't forget it.

They do not all have dual Bios, and once bootblock is bollixed one cannot do a recovery "blind" flash either.
That is ample reason to not lightly advise Flashing, it is still something one should only do when there are serious ducumented issues.

Anyway, tim_st knows about flashing and did some firmware "injection".

Hi

Maybe not a great many do bartPE.
fwiw, that filename is not even referenced in any of the DriverPacks driver INF and INI (I used txt search)

has anyone else tested this on "Intel(R) 82915G/GV/910GL Express Chipset Family" and  "Mobile Intel(R) 915GM/GMS,910GML Express Chipset Family" ??

it would have been nice had it worked sad

and sometimes, it is best to not do it.. we killed a mobo doing that, once.

hi
can you do us a favour?

can you test this one for us, please?
http://rapidshare.com/files/22957253/DP … nightly.7z
--------------------

-M-M
Update marvell Driver
replaced Ver= 11/14/2006,1.1.0.51 with marvell downloaded from intel 02/09/2007,1.2.0.24
(this version does not conflict with iastor)

[Marvell]
%mv61xxDesc%=mv61xx_Inst,PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6101
%mv61xxDesc%=mv61xx_Inst,PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6111
%mv61xxDesc%=mv61xx_Inst,PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6121
%mv61xxDesc%=mv61xx_Inst,PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6122
%mv61xxDesc%=mv61xx_Inst,PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6145



-M-M-O
old marvell DriverVer= 01/06/2006,1.0.0.3 Edited out HWID supported by newer version
Enabled for these three
PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6120
   PCI\VEN_11AB&DEV_6140
      VEN_11AB&DEV_6141

Massstorage INI update

removed a duplicate entry
[V-3] appeared twice
adjusted drivercount

edit to Highpoint [H-1] (reported by overflow, confirmed jtdoom)
a Fix for win2003, driver does not exist in XP. (also a Bart_PE fix)

Fixed (Muiz)
ATI (Siliconimage) 3112 driver
-\M\S\4 10/23/2006, 1.3.67.0

this is more important to YOU
Test
edit in Mass storage ini makes Silicon Image raid mode drivers load before Silicon Image NON-raid
---------

there are reports that this solved conflicts, which we all suspect is happening, (Bâshrat the Sneaky again mentions it in this topic)
---------
a last note (sorry, I must. We all learn to use search sooner or later.)
>> tut tut, you could have used search, and see posts about silicon, and then you would have seen this test version.

note to team
this one is same as for dell gx 945

it is packed for future release

hi
I just did that and put it in  -S\SM\D\4
the reason I did it in a new folder was that the driver SYS files and DLL were different size compared to all the duplicates..

you can do that too
no need for that hotfix file, it is outdated, and replaced with 888111

hi
mass storage textmode will not be slipped in from 3rd party.

if you look around in mass storage forum, you can find a test release that should adress intel conflics.

edit; I just read that remark by Mr Smartepants. This is one more VERY GOOD reason to not remove manual install and upgrade.

2,071

(74 replies, posted in Other)

yep, current public release of mass storage 7.01.1 has an INI, and current release of base7016 actually uses it.
(I had looked at this before I let a mass storage be tested by guys who could do tests on silicon image. And the edit in the INI worked for them.)

most other packs will have an INI too, but not all of them.
I have not seen INI for 3rd partypacks, for instance.
the INI files handle exceptions, so that is why they will make life easier.

hi
I am still trying to nail down what caused setup.ex_ to go awol.
At the moment, I am beginning to think it was not caused by NLite. (because I cannot reproduce this)
I recall I had an issue with mediaplayer, and I used ISR. The ISR base snapshot was old, so I got back to that day's, and then used windows normal "restore" points. (this can make a mess of recently changed folders)

textmode not doing what it was supposed to do, that I could reproduce long ago, and I probably can again.

you need not be
just edit winnt.sif, set Oempreinstall=0 and make the ISO to test.

hi

"Intel ICP Vortex SCSI RAID Controllers"
added
PCI\VEN_1119&DEV_0300
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_0600
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_0601

hehe, end of life products have a tendency to live longer than the vendors support them.

70322 is up
http://rapidshare.com/files/22957253/DP … nightly.7z

please post results