can't be 100% certain on 3rd party DriverPack ... they are provided by third parties
they do get looked over by many people though...
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
DriverPacks.net Forum » Posts by OverFlow
can't be 100% certain on 3rd party DriverPack ... they are provided by third parties
they do get looked over by many people though...
wow... good question.
Thanks for the heads up, and welcome to DriverPacks.net
adaptivepc.com/DP_Monitor_wnt5_x86-32_81227.7z
maybe even someone on the main team has an old copy laying around?
Autoit is used to create findhwids... many lame virus scanners will flag any program written in AutoIt as a virus (DriverPacks BASE included)
this is because some malware programs are written in AutoIt... however just because a program is written in AutoIt does not mean that it is a virus... this is a problem with the virus scanner not the app. Please report the false positive to the offending scanners support contact.
TY
I am going to ban you for 10 minutes deafdud... remember to be nice
definitely need the HWID.
If you tried disabling DriverPacks LAN and couldn't find the driver that will work in Drivers\Net (as a stand alone) then it is unlikely that we can fix it either.
I am assuming that these machines come preloaded with Win7?
try downloading the XP driver from here and if you find one that works report your HWID and the link to the driver that did work. http://downloadcenter.intel.com/SearchR … x?lang=eng
Excellent... you never did create a bug report over at the bugtracker.
Not many people get the opportunity to do so .
Clouds on the horizon are free...
My 486 could hash that in ten minutes
in theory you could add a sequence of garbage and it would again hash correctly... But mr_smarts is correct it would take a very powerful computer a very long time to arrive at the solution. Unless you just got lucky.
I agree with your analysis that this is the reverse of a bruteforce attack. with a BF attack the "Password" kicked out may or may not be the original password... it is simply a sequence of characters that will match the the encryption key when hashed.
Always nice to have you drop in Helmi!
it's not based on the medium of the monitor it is all in your head.
think of the lighting in your room as a strobe light, and the monitor as a strobe light.
If they are both flashing at close to or at the same rate it aggravates your brain.
ever watched a video of a monitor? did you see the black wave move up / down the monitor. In real time your brain fills in this blank info for you, and makes you tired.
if the video camera and the monitor are at different refresh rates the "wave" almost disapears. In real time your brain does not have to fill in the "blanks", you are less fatigued.
3... 2... 1... BOOM!
I hate it when i let the magic smoke out of my electronics.
I am sure you won't need LAN RIS.... unless you are doing RIS deployments...
Use SAD for the third party packs...
could mod the inf and force install it... but might be better just to have an unknown device
Dr. the Sneaky
Well a monitor driver driver does load in safemode... standard VGA
Custom drivers obviously don't load @ safemode.
Probably nowadays few monitors rely on AC input for their output freq. AC is converted to 12 VDC and then digitally pulse modulated for the refresh. So it would not matter what the input frequency was. however 60 hz refresh would look much better with 50hz lighting. much as 70hz refresh looks much better with 60hz lighting. I always avoid 60hz refresh like the plague. i have "fixed" a lot of display complaints with this simple tweak. Say NO to 60hz. (in the US). Heterodyning is BAD.
I doubt damage would occur on solid state devices. Prolly get an "out of range" error displayed as a worst case.
KTD is not and never was what it was intended to be... I always recomend against it's use.
I should disable it in BASE but i tend to not eliminate features, even if they are undesirable.
Everything has a proper place and useage. Perhaps i should make it a command line option and remove it from the GUI.
SAD is what makes us happy.
I think copy the sif is the better idea...
there are way to many exceptions and general weirdness to start from scratch... took us years to get it even close to right.
But I am glad you tried it and found some anomlies. Go ahead if you like but you are going to pull you hair out before it's over .
OK i think i have it fixed...
I am putting a test version up in the testing team forum.
Hopefully the fix does not break anything else...
found it... it was related to the dumpydooby bug... i think i have a fix in place testing now
you have the very rare honor of creating a BUG Report over at the bugtracker sir! that hasn't happened in years.
I am adding you to the testing team sir... a new forum is now visible to you
Brief explanation:
A replacement driver is tagged "Ultra" and this would erroniously match with
"asc3550 = "Advansys 3550 Ultra Wide SCSI Host Adapter"
Because it contained an exact match on the word "Ultra"
because of the way the search was done it would match a word contained within a larger string.
I am hoping the fix will not require a rewrite of the whole loop.
if i remember correctly they were replaced... (included in another driver) I will have to go back and look agian
It may be related to this too
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 093#p36093
I can't fine it right now but i rewrote part of the code to deal with multiple native drivers being replaced with a single replacement driver.
wow i haven't even written an app for nt6 yet...
So is win8 going to be NT 6.3 or NT 7?
That will decide how we add it to the forum
How would you like to be on the testing team?
DriverPacks.net Forum » Posts by OverFlow
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 3 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
[ Generated in 0.115 seconds, 5 queries executed ]