Frants wrote:

Yeah sure, my bad.

But I am helping wink Trying right now out the latest nightly of Masstorage as requested in another thread to see if Intel AHCI works now.

When I've learned something more useful than Java I would be more than glad to help!

Frants?
I hope that was not DriverPack MassStorage testpack 805D which I pulled because it will fail in live test.

Well, yes.. slipstream of DriverPack MassStorage 805D went without issue.. but then the live tests on 805D, (and private versions like 805E, 805F, up to K...) showed that the 3ware driver will always say it is corrupt during txtmode LIVE setup.
I remember that the 2006 version update of this driver (in 7.09.1 I believe) was also giving us "case sensitivity' issues.
But NOT found or corrupt is NOT same error.

So, I spent 7 hours on one update, with no good result, and read that the DriverPack MassStorage must be built up from the ground..
It made me sad.
It felt like a blow, just like that post linking to a stripped down DriverPack MassStorage, claiming that a heavily stripped down DriverPack MassStorage posted at copycat DriverPacks site works.

Come ON guys.
Help us make it better for all, not just for you.
We have to add requests and we see that when we drop older drivers there are reports about THAT.

something like the HFslip report in bugtracker is something I can not test, because I am like a mom and pop store test person, with a few live machines at best.. No network stuff, no sysprep.

moved from feedback to LAN forum.

Welcome to DriverPacks.
We ask for HWIDS of the machine it is needed for because we look for conflicting drivers while we look up why it is not supported.

405

(7 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)

thanks
It sheds a light on the riddle.

What we had in Lan D\L\NV\123 for some reason,
%NVENET.DeviceDesc%  =  NVENET_2k.NDI,  {1a3e09be-1e45-494b-9174-d7385b45bbf5}\NVNET_DEV008C
%NVENET.DeviceDesc%  =  NVENET_2k.NDI,  {1a3e09be-1e45-494b-9174-d7385b45bbf5}\NVNET_DEV00DF

what we have in D\L\NV3

[Nvidia]
%NVENET.DeviceDesc%  =  NVENET_2k.NDI,  {1a3e09be-1e45-494b-9174-d7385b45bbf5}\NVNET_DEV008C
%NVENET.DeviceDesc%  =  NVENET_2k.NDI,  {1a3e09be-1e45-494b-9174-d7385b45bbf5}\NVNET_DEV00DF

%NVENET.DeviceDesc%  =  NVENET_2k.NDI,  {1a3e09be-1e45-494b-9174-d7385b45bbf5}\NVNET_DEV0038
%NVENET.DeviceDesc%  =  NVENET_2k.NDI,  {1a3e09be-1e45-494b-9174-d7385b45bbf5}\NVNET_DEV0057

Do you see the two BOLD lines?
This made me think NV\123 could be removed, and 123 had version 5.10..

Well, who would believe that?
Nvidia can make old drivers win over new..
I have uploaded a file with ALL the Nvidia network drivers, and made it a topic of its own.
(it also has the business driver set.. 50.54 I believe.. which I see we do not have.. but a generic in 8.16 should cover that..)

the topic is there for all interested parties, and I should perhaps also upload Joshua's plugin..

haven't gotten 8.5 catalyst yet
but got Nvidia 175.16_geforce_winxp_32bit_international_whql in the 805D_nightly.
smile

Hi zookeeper
It looks like you already put together your version of graphics B.

Can you upload that?

Hi, and without DriverPack Graphics A DriverPack Graphics B and DriverPack Graphics C?
I have reason to beleive XP supports this when NO DriverPacks are used.

ventajou?
official sigmatel IDT had a few super generics what will mess up a whole range.
the new DriverPacks sound pack are not released yet, but they have (hopefully) worked around that, and one of our members showed us a sigmatel IDT m$ updated what had not a single bugger generic.

I had hoped another team member would build the pack with that file, and it has not happened yet.
But, I am seriously interested in the work you did, because we recently learned that the scanners we use are not perfect, and you could help?
(for instance, the graphics drivers.. when I use spotlightutility05.exe scan tool on Nvidia, I get zero output. sad )

abdou
I have also problem with french translation,I think its not complete because I have an error when i choose it and apply and clique NEXT...

(I don't know about the French translation.. I looked at the dutch today and considered it superb, but don't know if the french translator caught on to all the changes.)
(the pop up bug exists.. is this for bugtracker??)

edit >> today Jeff and I went through the translation files and we saw the reason for the translation error pop-up in many of them.

Getting people to see what can be done teaches those whom do not yet know what can be done.
My past experience says that we will see more tips and more easy solutions described in a not too distant future, and it all started by getting people like us asking you to help us help you.

for instance, I liked that ruby script a lot, but wished it was vbs.
(and it is not perfect yet, because it cannot yet supplant what we list as replaceifOS.)

412

(24 replies, posted in 3rd Party DriverPacks)

@ abdou
you are catching on real fast.
I admire people whom give detail and you pointed to things wrong in the the Third Party ModemPack

413

(24 replies, posted in 3rd Party DriverPacks)

Hi abdou
it is a Third Party DriverPack so you can actually add it, test it, and when it works you could then upload it for us to review.

About the VIA thing.
XP SP2 has VIAIDE which supports 571 and no other
XP SP3 has VIAIDE which supports 571 and no other (the driver also showed same when I did a binary compare..)
windows 2003 has support for 571
windows 2000 does not have support for 571

The hyperion (VIBUS) we load has support for 571 and ANOTHER.
What triggered my attention to this is basically this.
DriverPacks BASE 7052 loaded this later on.
DriverPacks BASE 805 has changed something in load order.
The busdrivers now show before scsi?

and 3waredrv loaded after ali and Qware and adaptec.. ??
It is first in INI, it should have loaded first.

I built a testpack with 3wareDrv.sys from 2008 slimesmile linked to and cannot make it load during txtmode in live runs.
I remember the 2006 update was one of those case sensitive buggers, and this one is always saying it is corrupt. (despite streaming on clean copies, despite changing the INI, despite changing case in the filename itself.. despite the archive showing no error.. sad

The live machine I tested on ran vista x64 setup with good result, and vista tests memory pretty good.
----
OH, I have to tell one thing to slimesmile.
the HWIDS list is NOT the same
There are four HWIDs, and the fourth has a difference.
You are lucky your bartPE runs, and that your machine does not use the fourth.

be my guest.. it is all yours.
sad

The 3ware update won't work.

do not waste your time and do not test 805D (3wareDrv.SYS error during txtmode.. the case sensitivity thing struck again..)

Hi
the 3ware update was done (but the file is corrupt?)

links pulled

8.05.E (22 may 2008. team)
Changed
'[I3] iastor 7.8, keep support for hardware not covered by new intel iastor driver. (JakeLD)'.
'|moved content of [I4] intel RAID/Cluster Miniport to [I5] to make \I4 the home for yet another Iastor (JakeLD)'.
'|[P7] correction in INI, a disabled HWID was re-enabled.'.
'|PB\ folder and [PB] INI section deleted'.
'|[V3] Commented 64 bits lines (JakeLD)'.
'|removed a redundant copy (Kopie van si3132r5.inf).'
'|removed DpInst.exe from IB4\ and IB5\ 

New
'[I4] Intel Matrix Storage 04/15/2008,8.0.0.1039 (team)'.
'|[M4] Marvell 64xx/63xx SAS Controller 12/06/2007,2.1.0.11 (JakeLD)',

Updated
'J\ JMicron JMB36X/37X Controller from 11/26/2007, 1.17.31.00 to 04/03/2008, 1.17.33.03 (JakeLD)'.
'|M\ Marvell 61xx RAID from 05/22/2007,1.2.0.45 to 10/18/2007,1.2.0.51 (JakeLD)'.
'|N\6\ from 05/04/2007,10.1.0.12 to 07/27/2007,10.1.0.15 (team)'.
'|V4\ VIA SATA from 10/18/2007,6.0.6000.230 [5.16a] to 04/03/2008,6.0.6000.252 [5.17a] (JakeLD)'.
'|[SB5] Silicon Image 3132 SATALink from 06/05/2007, 1.0.21.1 to 10/03/2007, 1.0.22.0 (team)'.
'|3\ 3ware from 12/04/2006,3.00.02.090 to 02/07/2008,3.00.04.020 (team)'

hi,
there are a few drivers which have REPLACE_if_OS.
And those you mention are files that have to be replaced..
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 095#p19095

(I should also tell you DriverPack MassStorage 804 has a known error.. We have a DriverPack MassStorage 805 testpack in testing. See sticky in DriverPack MassStorage forum.)

XP sp3 was released and the TEAM need feedback on the PE tool more than ever.
Every issue caused by DriverPack MassStorage for ubcd4win has to get a fix.

People need to realise why positive feedback helps solve issues.
DriverPack LAN had a flurry of posts with failures.
8021/805.1/805a/805b/805c/805d/805e(which is now805.2)

we have a DriverPack LAN 805.2 and it started when a REQ was posted about a missing HWID.
All hands on deck, so to speak.
(we have too few hands.. let me tell you.)
Bâshrat the Sneaky once figured a workaround (let's say in 2006. He combined a few driver sets)
And after that, Nvidia was not easy to make a single change to.

I think Nvidia gave up in 2006 because the last business platform unified driver-set nvidia released was (2007) with 2006 drivers.
One has to think about the efforts Joshua and Bâshrat the Sneaky put in when they worked on DriverPack LAN.
Since then, Nvidia have released quite a few new chips but no new bussiness platform set.

In the LAN forum, I repeated an older list with desciptions of downloads. (it was not even complete)
I have updated my collection of drivers and descriptions privately and a "scratch hairs, have coffee" lan file will be available soon.
The analitic will know when they see the "mess".
When you work on Nvidia you need gumbah to find back good humor, or anal IT and coffee.
(gumbah is a flemish cartoonist. )

>> edit, I forgot to mention SamLab as a hero.
His logs are badly compiled (probably because OS is russian and HWID read tool is not ), but he reports.
He told us DriverPack LAN 8.05.2 is not perfect and showed where it fails. (in humour, he sais another case.. a case for holmes. because I used that.)

We need watsons. Holmes could not do without watson.

Well, CCP and NONE installed the driver for ATI and when I redid that testplank to a plain txtmode only with the Gigabyte dowload, I could only CCC.. or not (which is normal because CCP is a DriverPacks choice no longer available in catalyst). and the CCC then worked.

When I fired up a clean format again (DriverPack MassStorage txtmode only) , and chose to NOT use CCC, the CDrom drivers left a mess, and next format was then done with the dowloaded exe (latest version) and that went well. (it is a form of ati catalyst 8x but specifically dubbed for gigabyte)

I had already figured I fubar'd the dotnet integrate.
(CCC works when I have a good dotnet addon)
So, ATI may work for others.. but I want to get verification. One card is not valid reson to say the testfile worked for the majority.
Absense of error report is no proof.
We do want "bigbrit style".
When it works, Bigbrit says so, and that way we also see what it worked on.

I figure that testers want to learn why positives also need to show the HWID log.
When a main team member sees a BSOD reported, he will focus on that.
Do you want to be the cause of thousands of man hours wasted by not reporting?
Good or bad.
IT Is important
(IT guys know this?)

remember the chipset topic that spun on about negatives for ages .. and then I offered a testpack and asked for positives.

DriverPack Graphics A  and B and C are quite complicated.
DriverPack Chipset and DriverPack MassStorage are essentials and have to evolve along with the major players.

The major reason we have not solved this is (in my eyes) the lack of complete database.
I hope we get helpers whom will code scanners or recode scanners.

Ask what we have, it ain't too bad.

I figure we'll find out what HWIDS in VIA SP3 natively supports, compare that to what HWIDS SP2 natively supports, then do some magic.
JakeLD is very good at this, and we have a large reporter group when things are WRONG.

Please folks, we do need pre-release testers..
We know we have many lurkers, we know we have a good many users doing massive rollouts and quite a few more serious pop & mom stores and repair IT folks.
Jeff thinks we see less than 1 percent of our DriverPacks users submit a post.

I think less than 35 percent of the posts are helping us in the first post, and the people who really want to help you want you to help us by submitting more data and logs.

Hi,
welcome to DriverPacks.

First thing I will say sounds like a shrug off.. Do not see this as a beratement.
You use the wrong order of doing it it to it.
Allow me to explain the absence of txtsetup.oem files.
We use DriverPack MassStorage INI to do the TXTmode (see the modify DriverPack MassStorage faq).
The sysprepper guru (and other anal(itic) users) figured that having 115 txtsetup.oem  files was a problem when they used DriverPacks for sysprep.

therefore, the answer to the Nlite scan question is NO.
(Since we do not keep the txtsetup.oem files, and the DriverPack MassStorage INI have been filtered and have VERY specific entries for those case where we use a driver with same HWID for different OS.)

We do not want to edit the driver INF files, and avoid it like the plague, but we had to do it to some.
(Some of our team members are sysprep users and they figured we should do it for many more, but the MAIN team want to keep sysfile rename and INF edits to the bare minimum.)

So, Brad, Nlite, then DriverPacks.
Please, DO READ THAT customise faq.

JakeLD?
can you update the 3ware for us and create a testpack?

I would also like to get the VIA hyperion driver removed or zeroed.
(I'll explain the reason, when I araxis'd a  clean SP2 and SP3 it looked like that SP3 has updated or added the hyperion.)

The txtmode driver for hyperion was added to DriverPack MassStorage not too long ago.
(the 571 issues could  magically dissolve. SP2 may benefit((what was natively supported in SP2 by its via driver?? I dunno), but it sure looks like SP3 will have real issue in Via if we leave all via in the DriverPack MassStorage.)