cwbshaw wrote:
Success!
Hot diggity dog!
I'll be rolling these fixes into the 7.09.2 nightlies (A, B, & C). The Graphics_A DP will incorporate the 7.9 catalyst.
3,676 2007-09-12 01:18:56
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
3,677 2007-09-11 16:26:19
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Thank you. Looking forward to your test results.
Oh, and before anyone asks...I'm already working on the ATI Catalyst 7.9 suite released yesterday. 
3,678 2007-09-11 05:28:32
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
cwbshaw wrote:
Tried the Graphics B 7.09.1 but still got the same Matrox popup. I tried it both with and without QSC, but still got the same result on both the Dell Optiplex 745 and the Optiplex GX620.
OK, grasping at straws here. Can you retest by integrating into a fresh source after replacing all three graphics DriverPacks .ini files with the following code:
Graphics_A
[DriverPack]
platform = "wnt5_x86-32"
name = "Graphics A"
; version 709.1
rootDir = "D\G"
; OPTIONAL
classes = "Display"
driverCount = 2
decompSize = 174
compSize = 66.1
[A-1]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 2
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 3
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%SystemDrive%\ATICCC.ins"
exc_1_tagFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCC.exe"
exc_1_tagFile3 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgx.dll"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 1
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\*.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 1
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCC.exe"
exc_2_tagFiles = 3
exc_2_tagFile1 = "%SystemDrive%\ATICCP.ins"
exc_2_tagFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCP.exe"
exc_2_tagFile3 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgx.dll"
exc_2_+hwids = 0
exc_2_-hwids = 0
exc_2_+infFiles = 1
exc_2_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\*.inf"
exc_2_-infFiles = 0
exc_2_commands = 1
exc_2_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCP.exe"Graphics_B
[DriverPack]
platform = "wnt5_x86-32"
name = "Graphics B"
; version 709.1
rootDir = "D\G"
; OPTIONAL
classes = "Display"
driverCount = 44
decompSize = 383
compSize = 58.1
[3-1]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 1
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\3dfxV2ps.dll"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 1
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\3\1\*.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 1
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\3\1\V2_OC_control_panel.exe"
[A-5]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 3
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%SystemDrive%\ATICCP.ins"
exc_1_tagFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCP.exe"
exc_1_tagFile3 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgr.dll"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 1
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\5\*.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 1
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCP.exe"
exc_2_tagFiles = 3
exc_2_tagFile1 = "%SystemDrive%\ATICCC.ins"
exc_2_tagFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCC.exe"
exc_2_tagFile3 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgr.dll"
exc_2_+hwids = 0
exc_2_-hwids = 0
exc_2_+infFiles = 1
exc_2_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\5\*.inf"
exc_2_-infFiles = 0
exc_2_commands = 1
exc_2_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\1\ATICCC.exe"
[M-1]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 1
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\mtxparm.sys"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 1
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\M\1\*.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 1
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\M\1\matrox.exe"Graphics_C
[DriverPack]
platform = "wnt5_x86-32"
name = "Graphics C"
; version 709.1
rootDir = "D\G"
; OPTIONAL
classes = "Display"
driverCount = 8
decompSize = 205
compSize = 64.0
[A-2]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 2
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\2\CPanel.exe"
exc_1_tagFile2 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgr.dll"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 1
exc_1_-hwid1 = "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5653&SUBSYS_00701025&REV_00"
exc_1_+infFiles = 2
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\2\C2_40334.inf"
exc_1_+infFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\2\CX_40334.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 3
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\2\CPanel.exe -y -o%DPSTMP%"
exc_1_command2 = "%DPSTMP%\setup.exe /K"
exc_1_command3 = "cmd.exe /c rd /s /q %DPSTMP%"
[A-6]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 2
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\6\CPanel.exe"
exc_1_tagFile2 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgr.dll"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 2
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\6\C2_26766.inf"
exc_1_+infFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\6\CX_26766.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 3
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\6\CPanel.exe -y -o%DPSTMP%"
exc_1_command2 = "%DPSTMP%\setup.exe /K"
exc_1_command3 = "cmd.exe /c rd /s /q %DPSTMP%"
[A-A]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 2
exc_1_tagFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\A\CPanel.exe"
exc_1_tagFile2 = "%SystemRoot%\system32\atidemgr.dll"
exc_1_+hwids = 0
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 2
exc_1_+infFile1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\A\C2_21962.inf"
exc_1_+infFile2 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\A\CX_21962.inf"
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 3
exc_1_command1 = "%DPSROOT%\D\G\A\A\CPanel.exe -y -o%DPSTMP%"
exc_1_command2 = "%DPSTMP%\setup.exe /K"
exc_1_command3 = "cmd.exe /c rd /s /q %DPSTMP%"If you notice, I made the .ini exceptions more strict by adding additional tagfiles. It's difficult for the older ATI drivers in the C DP because they mostly contain the same-name files.
3,679 2007-09-10 06:46:38
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
chud wrote:
Incidently the newest driver on Intels site I could find with 865 support is
DriverVer=09/20/2005,6.14.10.4396
Hmmm, that's odd. When I refreshed the Intel folders, that driver wasn't listed (at least I don't remember it) which was why the changelog read I\5 was unchanged. 
I'll compare the .infs and add it in there. Thanks for pointing that out.
I'm reluctant to add Dell drivers into the Intel folders, only because I would like to keep the DriverPacks as generic as possible. We may add them in if Dell makes a 'unified' package that covers a wide range of their products, otherwise we'd be forever updating these DriverPacks just for incremental changes to a single platform.
*Edit,
I remember why I left I\5 alone now...It was the only driver to support 830M (And 845G/865G), the newer driver drops 830M support. Seeing how you can't even buy new Socket 478 mobos with 845/865/875 chipsets anymore (I've only found them on ebay), we may be revamping the whole Intel folder into a 'legacy' DP later in the future. Either that, or breaking the driver signing by combining all the driver files together along with all the .infs...should save some weight.
Anyway, I'll see what I can do.
3,680 2007-09-08 17:25:51
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Thanks Jaak,
The .ini M-1 section was looking for a MTX*.dll when it didn't need to (so I took it out). I figure just the .inf/exe matching would be sufficient.
3,681 2007-09-08 06:21:00
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
DP_Graphics_B_wnt5_x86-32_709.1
http://dev.driverpacks.thesneaky.com/dr … 2_709.1.7z
MD5: 6603E1C0452A2400EA73157BC38EE027
chud & cwbshaw, can you two download and test this nightly build? I did not include any Dell specific drivers, but I fixed some of the Intel (deleted I\7, added I\4 for 845G) and the Matrox (.ini edit).
3,682 2007-09-08 05:03:52
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Jaak wrote:
Erik?
could you perhaps update your tute with parts of the txt I use in the tute I keep online?
Sure Jaak,
When I get some free time this weekend I'll take care of it.
cwbshaw, I'm still at a loss why your finisher log looks like it does. I'm going to try to recreate your setup and install it over the weekend. Can you email me at mr_smartepants_a-t_driverpacks.net with your specific integration contents/order?
I've already tested using all the DriverPacks together and I'm not encountering your errors.
3,683 2007-09-07 23:50:21
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Thanks for reporting back. Well, that should NOT be happening. I'll get on that straight away. My initial guess is something I put in the .ini file for Matrox that somehow matches the ATI files.
*Edit
Well, this part of your finisher log is very interesting:
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Verifying requirements for exception [M-1] (6 of 23 exceptions).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 1. tagFiles (ALL tagFiles must be found)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Found tagfile "C:\WINDOWS\system32\Mtx*.dll" (1/1).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 4. +infFiles (ANY +infFiles must be matched)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Wildcard specified for +infFiles requirement: scan for .inf files (1 of 1 +infFiles).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&REV_00" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Matched +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> => All requirements for exception [M-1] have been met!
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Verifying requirements for exception [A-2] (7 of 23 exceptions).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 1. tagFiles (ALL tagFiles must be found)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Found tagfile "C:\D\G\A\2\CPanel.exe" (1/1).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 3. -hwids (ANY -hwids must be matched)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 4. +infFiles (ANY +infFiles must be matched)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Wildcard specified for +infFiles requirement: scan for .inf files (1 of 1 +infFiles).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&REV_00" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Matched +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> => All requirements for exception [A-2] have been met!
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Verifying requirements for exception [A-6] (8 of 23 exceptions).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 1. tagFiles (ALL tagFiles must be found)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Found tagfile "C:\D\G\A\6\CPanel.exe" (1/1).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 4. +infFiles (ANY +infFiles must be matched)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Wildcard specified for +infFiles requirement: scan for .inf files (1 of 1 +infFiles).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&REV_00" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Matched +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> => All requirements for exception [A-6] have been met!
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Verifying requirements for exception [A-A] (9 of 23 exceptions).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 1. tagFiles (ALL tagFiles must be found)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Found tagfile "C:\D\G\A\A\CPanel.exe" (1/1).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> 4. +infFiles (ANY +infFiles must be matched)
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Wildcard specified for +infFiles requirement: scan for .inf files (1 of 1 +infFiles).
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> ! Could not match +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&REV_00" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> Matched +infFile"C:\D\G\A\1\CX_50960.inf" through the HWID "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183" (original HWID: "PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7183&SUBSYS_0D021028&REV_00").
2007-09-07 10:11:51 : <FLTR> => All requirements for exception [A-A] have been met!Notice how all the criteria are being met by a single .inf?
According to your log, you should have the ATICCC installed as well as the control panel. Someone else reported that error as well but we couldn't track it down to anything. Oh yeah, it was you back on page-3 that reported the double ATI install. Did you have the QSC enabled in the DPBase? If so, please delete everything in the QSC folder.
3,684 2007-09-06 03:39:45
Re: Rocky start to September, but smooth sailing ahead. (7 replies, posted in News)
BTW, what's up with the HTML code on: http://www.driverpacks.net/DriverPacks/

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>IE doesn't display the funky characters but Firefox does.
Oh, and the markup on that page doesn't validate at W3C.org
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% … mp;group=0
3,685 2007-09-06 02:29:21
Topic: [REL] Intel 8.4.0.1016 (1 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_ … p;lang=eng
It covers 848 through 975 series chipsets.
3,686 2007-09-06 01:31:12
Re: Intel SigmaTel HDA (19 replies, posted in DriverPack Sound)
tazmaniandevil wrote:
I had a similar issue with this at the end of last year. I mentioned a fix in this thread, but forgot to give Muiz the details.
I implemented your fix in the 7.09 nightly build I'm currently working on. I'm wrestling with the Intel audio drivers at the moment. I hope to have a test build up in the next day or so for you to test.
3,687 2007-09-05 23:11:54
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
cdob wrote:
Cat file is missing in Intel Embedded drivers. Intel didn't include Embedded cat file.
Try last test package, but remove Intel Embedded drivers.
Does graphics drivers load at Dell GX260,GX270 and GX280?
Good catch. I'm downloading the intel package again to look for the .cat file (it's referenced in the .inf). Odd that Intel would release the package without double checking the referenced files were included.
I agree with cdob, delete the G\I\7 folder and repackage. I think we can probably delete that folder entirely since it's meant for Linux, WinCE, and XP embedded which are not supported by the Driverpacks in general.
Hello! Intel!!! Unified driver please....please?
*Edit,
Nope, the .cat file is missing from that Intel package. I'll remove the folder and reupload a 7.09.1 nightly including some Dell drivers in a day or so.
3,688 2007-09-05 18:21:51
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
NHS eh? Do you work in their IT dept? I'll be retiring in two years and need a job (Adenbrookes) to keep busy.
I'll troll the Dell website and put together a test DP of Dell drivers. Similar to what you did.
As long as the .inf points to the correct folder location, it doesn't really matter where the driver files are located.
As to the .cat files, Intel ALWAYS includes the .cat files, Dell on the other hand does so infrequently.
3,689 2007-09-05 18:17:01
Re: VPC Network issues? (4 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
I've had this problem in the past, and I've found that it was caused by removing drivers from driver.cab with nLite. If I select to NOT remove any drivers using nLite, everything in VPC works perfectly.
VPC just uses synthetic hardware/software drivers to interface with the host system.
3,690 2007-09-05 06:18:55
Topic: Rocky start to September, but smooth sailing ahead. (7 replies, posted in News)
Well first off, I should apologize for bringing down the Driverpacks tracker system while updating the website a few days ago. Thankfully, Jaak managed to step in and save the day. Good job Jaak!
Now for the news!
The Graphics Driverpacks have been rigorously tested and beat-on for the past two months, and now they're ready for primetime. All three Graphics Driverpacks have reached parity in their version numbers. 7.09 for the A, B & C Graphics Driverpacks. They're 99% bug-free (still some bug reports from SysPrep users and the odd nVidia BSOD report), but those occur under conditions the average user should not encounter. We'll continue to beat on the Driverpacks, but keep those bug-reports coming in. We can only fix issues if we're aware of them.
The LAN Driverpack was updated to 7.09 and soon we'll be seeing 7.09 releases of the other Driverpacks as we wrap up testing on those.
I'd like to personally thank all those from the testing team (you know who you are!) You guys are ruthless and thorough! I wouldn't have it any other way.
New hardware is being developed and sold every day. We need all the testers we can get. The more hardware we can test on, the better the Driverpacks will get.
Like Jaak said:
You need us? We need you!
*Edit, 11 Sept.
The Graphics Driverpacks all received bugfixes since the 7.09 release. Most fixes were in the .ini section.
New DP versions are:
Graphics_A 7.09.1
Graphics_B 7.09.2
Graphics_C 7.09.1
The UpdateTracker will get updated soon to reflect these recent changes.
3,691 2007-09-05 06:00:54
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Did you notice if the drivers included any .cat files? My experience is 'No'. That would explain why your still getting the "Driver node not trusted" errors.
The problem with including all the Dell specific drivers is that the G_B DP would balloon in size well beyond what the average user (or the server) could handle. 
In cases like this, it's not unheard of for the user to create their own DP, as you have done, for specific (troublesome) hardware.
I myself cannot use the 3rd party Modem DP because the Motorola driver .inf overlaps my Agere modem .inf and installs the wrong driver. My solution? My own specialized modem DP.
3,692 2007-09-03 18:26:52
Re: nVidia nForce 520/560 chipset & lan drivers (17 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Always go with the numerically higher version.
Test versions are just that...for testing purposes. Many times test versions become final, but other times there are components missing from test versions that get fixed when made final.
3,693 2007-09-03 07:40:47
Re: Testers needed for new Graphics driverpacks (226 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
First post updated.
DP_Graphics_B_wnt5_x86-32_709
Link Disabled for 7.09 release.
MD5: B6414822742A8D0E7309D14C9EAD14C1
Size: 54 MB
Highlights, Intel & Via sections have changed since 7.07test.
Changelog:
-.INI
Corrected Matrox section typo (Thanks Debugger)
Updated .ini to include new ATICCC/ATICCP install method. (mr_smartepants)
Deleted [A-2] section, duplicated in Graphics_C DP (mr_smartepants)
-G\A\5\ Optimized and validated .inf code line-by-line. Removed all HWIDS for 9500 series and above. (mr_smartepants)
-G\A\B\ ATI Rage PRO 02/28/2002, 5.10.2600.6010 (Muiz & Ruud)
-G\A\C\ ATI Rage XL Deleted/redundant to G\A\B (Ruud)
-G\I\1 Updated from 05/25/2007,6.14.10.4833 to 08/07/2007,6.14.10.4859 (14.31) (mr_smartepants)
-G\I\2 Unchanged 02/07/2006,6.14.10.4497 (14.19.50) (mr_smartepants)
-G\I\3 Unchanged 01/13/2007,6.14.10.4764 (14.25.50) (mr_smartepants)
-G\I\5 Unchanged 08/20/2004,6.14.10.3889 (14.7) (mr_smartepants)
-G\I\6 Unchanged 07/23/2002,6.13.01.3196 (6.7) (mr_smartepants)
-G\I\7 Updated from 09/25/2005,4.1.0.704 to 06/04/2007,7.0.0.1004 (mr_smartepants)
-G\I\8 Deleted, duplicated from -I\3 (mr_smartepants)
-G\M\1\ Matrox (all) updated to v2.04.00.179 SE U, 05/17/2007 (mr_smartepants)
-G\M\1\ - a functionality FIX. (Ruud)
Moved the following files to G\M\2\:
g200.cat / G200.inf / g200mms.cat / G200MMS.inf / g400.cat / G400.inf / g450.cat / G450.inf / g450mms.cat / G450MMS.inf
g550.cat / G550.inf / DUALGS.inf / dualgs.cat
-G\M\2 Matrox G200, G200 MMS, G400, G450, G450 MMS and G550 legacy driver 05/08/2006, 5.96.004 (Ruud). (Has functionality the NEWEST driver does NOT have)
-G\M\3 through 5 Deleted, all Matrox cards covered by G\M\1\ (mr_smartepants)
-G\V\1 Updated from 06/02/2005, 6.14.10.0226 to 12/29/2005, 6.14.10.0276 (16.94.44.45)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\2 Updated from 09/14/2006, 6.14.10.0333 to 04/28/2007, 6.14.10.0364 (22.00.01j)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\3 Unchanged 03/09/2005, 6.14.10.0212 (16.94.42.16)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\4 Unchanged 09/24/2002, 6.13.10.3137(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\5 Unchanged 11/10/2006, 6.14.10.0342 (16.94.52.04)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\6 Updated from 06/02/2005, 6.14.10.0226 to 06/07/2007, 6.14.10.0367 (22.00.01m)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\7 Unchanged from 12/18/2006, 6.14.10.0343 (16.94.52.05)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\8 Updated from 11/10/2006, 6.14.10.0075 to 05/15/2007, 6.14.10.0092 (20.00.01d)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\9 Updated from 03/13/2007, 6.14.10.0358 to 06/14/2007, 6.14.10.0368 (22.00.01n)(mr_smartepants)
-G\V\A Updated from 03/01/2007, 6.14.10.0086 to 07/06/2007, 6.14.10.0099 (20.00.01g)(mr_smartepants)@chud.
I have no idea how to help you with this. I'm at a loss.
We should be able to finalize all these DriverPacks and put this thread to bed. Any takers?
3,694 2007-09-02 20:56:20
Re: [REL] DriverPack Modem: 7.09.22 (76 replies, posted in 3rd Party DriverPacks)
Holy Cow!
54 subfolders under ACER? 
Surely some of those files are duplicates and can be converged.
3,695 2007-09-02 17:23:17
Re: nVidia nForce 520/560 chipset & lan drivers (17 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Jaak wrote:
There is some exception coding in Base for method 1, and intel and NV folders are hard referenced in the code
Good to know! I knew nvidia drivers were tricky for a reason.
I guess I should buy an nvidia-based system when I build my new rig for Xmas.
3,696 2007-09-02 02:47:49
Re: [TUTORIAL] ATI Mobility widescreen support (changing resolutions) (10 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Absolutely! And it's where I got some of my inspiration for this project.
3,697 2007-09-01 22:59:06
Re: nVidia nForce 520/560 chipset & lan drivers (17 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Sorry, someone moved the file on the server.
Try this:
http://dev.driverpacks.thesneaky.com/dr … 32_7081.7z
(MD5 Hash: C6FA46ACF23195F4E9B2BCEFCF8E2C95)
3,698 2007-09-01 22:58:58
Re: [IMPL] ASUS M2N-X | NVIDIA Network Bus Enumerator (6 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
JakeLD wrote:
Done.
DP_LAN_wnt5_x86-32_7081.7z
(MD5 Hash: C6FA46ACF23195F4E9B2BCEFCF8E2C95)This a test pack leave feedback please.
Dead link.
Was it supposed to be:
3,699 2007-09-01 17:38:13
Re: nVidia nForce 520/560 chipset & lan drivers (17 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Thanks,
There are others working the issues. JakeD posted a test LAN DP for this chipset.
http://dev.driverpacks.thesneaky.com/dr … 32_7081.7z
The Chipset DP should follow soon, but the Mass Storage drivers look complicated. Best to leave that one for others experienced in the task (Jaak, Muiz).
3,700 2007-09-01 17:35:26
Re: [IMPL] ASUS M2N-X | NVIDIA Network Bus Enumerator (6 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
The other thread this is being discussed in is:
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 941#p13941