DPs_BASE.exe /SETTINGS:"%pathtobase%\DPs_BASE.ini"
3,201 2008-11-21 08:38:20
Re: [Feature?] Need Silent Parameter to run DPs_BASE.exe with custom ini (2 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
3,202 2008-11-20 05:57:47
Re: [IMPL] Mobile Intel(R) 945 Express Chipset Family - Lenovo S10 ideapad (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
newsposter wrote:
Is this a better/newer driver than the 'generic' Intel GMA driver (rev 5009) that was posted last week?
Yes, and it directly supports your HWID with no modifications. 
3,203 2008-11-18 17:23:36
Re: [IMPL] Mobile Intel(R) 945 Express Chipset Family - Lenovo S10 ideapad (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Ooh, good find.
Updating now...
3,205 2008-11-18 07:16:57
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Try it without your 3rd party DriverPacks please.
3,206 2008-11-15 08:19:20
Re: [IMPL] ATi ES-1000 Integrated Video Adapter for Server Boards (2 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Uploaded in the "Testing Team" area.
3,207 2008-11-15 05:27:15
Re: [IMPL] ATi ES-1000 Integrated Video Adapter for Server Boards (2 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
No problem!
Whoa, those are kinda old eh? I think we already support that chip...let me look.
*Edit
Yeah, there's a single dupe hwid in \A5 for Radeon 7000. I'm sure it'll be no problem though.
Uploading nightly now...
3,208 2008-11-13 03:59:31
Re: [SLV] QL2300.SYS File not found (6 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
Welcome to the 'Testing Team' Hector!
Please review the new forum areas open to you now.
3,209 2008-11-12 00:30:35
Re: DP Base [all versions] and the XP 'Repair' Option (55 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Floppy? What's a floppy? 
3,210 2008-11-10 03:40:49
Re: How to slipstream for windows unattended installation (7 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
What that means, is you integrate DriverPacks BASE into your source LAST!
This is only when building your install disc. Once Windows is installed, you update normally.
Besides, you can't use nlite or RVMI to load hotfixes into a running XP install. That's just crazy
3,211 2008-11-09 18:39:10
Re: Where are the latest betas? (11 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
ATI Catalyst 8.8 was absolute crap. I had so many problems getting that garbage to integrate properly we finally ditched it and went back to cat 8.7 until later cats were released. That's why our dev time is so long between releases, we make sure they're bug-free.
Just because a driver has a higher version number, doesn't make it better.
3,212 2008-11-09 00:04:09
Re: Where are the latest betas? (11 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
We don't use that nightly server anymore because it was unreliable, slow, and non-testers were using them in production environments (not cool).
3,213 2008-11-08 07:06:30
Re: Current location of nightlies? (5 replies, posted in Software)
Check out the new Forum sections now available to you!
3,214 2008-11-07 17:53:40
Re: [SOLVED] freeze a T34 installation in xp (68 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
There is no Intel in DriverPack Graphics C.
Can you post your HWIDs please.
3,215 2008-11-07 07:16:01
Re: [SLVD] Graphics C 8.10.2 - Geforce4 MX 440 Problem (13 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OK, so I need feedback now.
Our options are these:
1) All 3 graphics DriverPacks have zero HWID overlap but driversigning is broken.
2) Driversigning is preserved for all 3 DriverPacks but they have significant HWID overlap which may cause conflicts.
3,216 2008-11-07 07:13:12
Re: DP_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_8102\D\G\A1\B_68405\ativvaxx.ca_ question (12 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OK, I must be blind. Where can I find the FTP upload info for the new server? Email me?
3,217 2008-11-06 06:59:07
Re: DP_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_8102\D\G\A1\B_68405\ativvaxx.ca_ question (12 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OK, the new file is on the final server, same file name. I renamed the flawed 8102 file to DP_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_8102old.7z
If you want to rename the new file to 8103 that's cool too.
3,218 2008-11-05 17:51:20
Re: Modifying driver packs (3 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
The root of your .7z file should be the D\ folder and the DriverPacks Finisher .ini file (unless it's a nightly, then it would have a changelog too)
3,219 2008-11-05 17:49:04
Re: DP_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_8102\D\G\A1\B_68405\ativvaxx.ca_ question (12 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
That's what's funny, that line is already there! I'll fix it and update the site. There's an .ini bug left in there too. Enough to warrant an increment update.
3,220 2008-11-05 17:38:40
Re: [SLVD] Graphics C 8.10.2 - Geforce4 MX 440 Problem (13 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Damn, I really didn't think the driver-signing would be that big a deal. The original signed .inf is relabeled nv4_dispinf.bak, just delete the current nv4_disp.inf and relabel the .bak file to nv4_disp.inf to restore signing.
3,221 2008-11-05 09:40:20
Re: [SLVD] Graphics C 8.10.2 - Geforce4 MX 440 Problem (13 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Can you post a {sanitized} copy of your winnt.sif? I'd love to see if driversigning was disabled.
3,222 2008-11-05 05:45:37
Re: DP_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_8102\D\G\A1\B_68405\ativvaxx.ca_ question (12 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Actually, that's my fault. The file IS uncompressed already, I just forgot to rename the file. The .ca_ files need to be .cap (check the [sourcedisksfiles] section of the .inf and you'll see.)
This is fixed in the nightly, but I should re-release DriverPack Graphics A 8102 to fix that file, just in case.
3,223 2008-11-04 17:28:51
Re: [SLVD] Graphics C 8.10.2 - Geforce4 MX 440 Problem (13 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Can you try this DriverPack Graphics C nightly? I moved N3 to DriverPack Graphics C and updated it to 93.71
http://driverpacks.sytes.net/driverpack … 2_811n1.7z
3,224 2008-11-03 03:53:18
Re: [PROBLEM][8.09RC1][slipstreamer???] after slipstreaming DriverPacks setup fail (23 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
The nvidia control panel options are not currently in DriverPack Graphics B or C, but they are easily added via DriverPacks Finisher .ini entries.
Jeff, the easiest option is to enable the control panel options for ANY graphics dp. Adding that function to the latest DPbase RC won't break any current release DriverPacks since the only .ini that supports it is DriverPack Graphics A at present.
I'll go ahead and start modifying the .ini files for the other two graphics DriverPacks to support that option. Easy.
3,225 2008-11-02 18:37:29
Re: [PROBLEM][8.09RC1][slipstreamer???] after slipstreaming DriverPacks setup fail (23 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
benjamminzIS wrote:
damn... guess I'm going to have to wait a bit longer... maybe I should try stepping back to an older graphics driver pack?
Yes, try the DriverPack Graphics C instead of A.
I just uploaded it. For nvidia 6100, DriverPack Graphics C uses the rock-solid v93.71 drivers, your hwid overlaps with DriverPack Graphics A. If DriverPack Graphics C works better for you, I'll remove the overlap for that series chipset from DriverPack Graphics A.
Don't forget to remove DriverPack Graphics A from your .ISO
http://driverpacks.sytes.net/driverpack … 2_811n1.7z
And dpms has been updated too.
http://driverpacks.sytes.net/driverpack … 32_810H.7z
It also wouldn't hurt to start with a fresh source.