CBITS wrote:Hello all! This thread has been the missing puzzle piece to a project I've been working on for work. Without it, I would have kept going around and around in a giant oval! By using the 6.05 Chipset driver pack along with the updated driver packs (7.04), I finally have been able to make a universal unattended XP slip w/ drivers & 3rd-party apps for the Dell machines within my department. Since the disc's creation, I've successfully tested the slip on a Dell Optiplex GX520, Latitude E105, and an Inspiron 6400. If the disc continues to be successful with the Dells, then it will become the department's stock installation disc!
@Bashrat, Thanks for the driver packs... I've talked to my supervisor to see what we can do to to support driverpacks project.
Peter
Chemistry & Biochemistry IT Services
University of Texas at Austin
Hi,
I would sure like to know wether our latest release fixed this issue, for this release has more or less been implementing same thing CBITS did.
I downloaded just about all archived chipset drivers from Intel, and the latest.
Then I used those to build our fresh pack with NO OLD files missing, and the newer ones got added/overwrote older.
The SP folder was not present in latest INTEL driver, and latest driver supported all OSes.
I Kept the SP folders, tho, and because I intended to use a single folder for all OSes, I made sure each folder had all files in it that the other had. (They were all the same files, but one \SP folder had an extra file and that got included in the other \SP folders) .
Then I discovered I could not use a single folder (which I had calledl X86 in a private test version.), because when I tested this with Method 1, I got an error like <IN\XP folder missing> during slipstream.
((Using this X86 folder, building a Disc with Method 2 ran without problem.))
So, the release has same folder stucture it had, but all OLD files these machines might use are included, and this should finally solve this issue.
(this Intel update in Chipset and mass storage DriverPack aimed to solve the issues)
I'd like to hear feedback, so that this can maybe get the topic title change we all like to see.
Can we get rid of [NOT FIXABLE] ?
You tell us.
Last edited by jtdoom (2007-06-18 22:02:45)
The answer was 42?
Kind regards, Jaak.