double bump
901 2010-11-20 19:49:24
Re: [REQ] [GUI] DP_Base - MultiBoot Platform Profile (3 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
902 2010-11-20 19:48:38
Re: [REQ/IDEA] Nice graphical billboard for DP Finsher? (14 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
any more feedback on this?
903 2010-11-20 19:47:26
Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names (8 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Bump... Erik? Guys?
904 2010-11-20 19:45:11
Re: REQ: Uncompressed drivers option (2 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
working on it
905 2010-11-20 19:44:07
Re: [IMPL] md5 hashes / driverpacks (8 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Implemented in 10.6.x version of DriverPacks BASE
906 2010-11-20 19:36:02
Re: [IMPL] Problems with internal card readers (19 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Implemented with latest test ver
907 2010-11-20 19:31:17
Re: [IMPL] Feature Request (3 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
908 2010-11-20 19:29:49
Re: [IMPL] Option to copy DPs_BASE.log to slipstream location [Approved] (7 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Implemented in test version
909 2010-11-20 19:11:42
Re: [IMPL] Minimizing all of driverpack while streamlining (7 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Implementing in test version
910 2010-11-20 19:09:39
Re: [IMPL] Compatibility with remote installation service RIS with XP (4 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
I am implementing this in our test version now
911 2010-11-20 17:16:58
Re: Value in .SIF file corrupt or missing (9 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
there is a simple solution... perform the updates to your source in the recomended order. DriverPacks is always the LAST step. That is pretty simple.
If not then your source will be corrupted if you reinstall DriverPacks to your source. Even if you delete the .org files. The best thing to do is to make a copy of your source prior to adding DriverPacks. I make a backup before each step of my process. If you follow the proper procedure, by installing DriverPacks last, then you can run DriverPacks BASE with no packs selected and it will "uninstall" the DriverPacks and then you can make changes and then reinstall the DriverPacks. Reverting to a backup is safer and easier. I hope that helps. This is clearly documented in our tutorial. IE rtfm.
There is no simple or easy way to recover if the "install DriverPacks last" rule is broken. It may not even be possable.
912 2010-11-17 16:24:51
Re: Using DriverPacks in BartPE - remove drivers in Scsiadater directory? (2 replies, posted in BartPE - UBCD4Win - WinPE)
run Disk Managment...
913 2010-11-16 18:24:53
Re: [IMPL] Minimizing all of driverpack while streamlining (7 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
I can do that ... NP
914 2010-11-14 16:54:15
Re: [IMPL] Minimizing all of driverpack while streamlining (7 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
LOL
Perhaps i could change it but no one ever mentioned it was annoying before
915 2010-11-14 13:13:45
Re: [IMPL] Minimizing all of driverpack while streamlining (7 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
That is intentional.
916 2010-11-14 11:50:23
Re: [REQ] Intel 82577LM (48 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
Provide the DL link to the driver and the HWIDs ...
CDOB hopefully will know what to do, he is a BartPE master
917 2010-11-13 16:52:09
Re: [REQ] Intel 82577LM (48 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
If adding the DriverPacks did not fix your NIC then disable the DriverPacks plugin and add your drivers manually
simply copy them to yourBartpefolder\drivers\yourdriverfolderhere\
and build and test, pretty easy
918 2010-11-13 15:22:05
Re: [REQ] Intel 82577LM (48 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
cool...
XP or 2k3 what SP level?
DriverPacks = LAN, MASS, WLAN and Graphics?
stock BartPE from bart website = Vanilla
919 2010-11-13 11:36:34
Re: [REQ] Intel 82577LM (48 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
did you first add the correct driver? what are your HWIDs? what device? which DriverPacks? Which DriverPacks BASE version? What OS? Vanilla BartPE or UBCD4Win or other? If UBCD4Win Which ver...
You want help? Then we need you to help us to help you.
Please see 'read BEFORE you post' linked in my signature. (it's called that for a reason)
920 2010-11-13 11:09:56
Re: e7221 intel driver for xp64 (8 replies, posted in Software)
here is a no brainer way to find out
http://downloads.vmware.com/d/details/p … hkYmRwKg==
That app is provided by vmware so users can easily determine if a machine is eligible to run a 64 bit version of an OS (be it windows, linux or other). Run it and you have your answer.
Can't make it any easier than that
PS are you going to try the 2k3 workstation route if you do in fact have a 64 bit machine? I would if you aren't interested in going with Win7. Vista and XP64 are garbage.
PSS It's entirely ok if you don't personally like NT6, you are certainly entitled to have an opinion. It's your machine after all. That was why I gave you several viable options and also offering the option of trying to help you fix / force the xp64 driver (though not recomended... lead a horse to water ). Even after I said that my experience is that xp64 is not worth the trouble ;P.
921 2010-11-13 10:57:52
Re: Universal Imaging Question (4 replies, posted in Universal Imaging)
You are welcome Yuriku,
Read what is here and do some trial deployments, once you have tried it feel free to ask anything you like. We really appreciate it when our users show that they have familarized themselfs with what is already here. Most of the time any queston you may have has already been answered... We have been doing this for over 7 years .
Welcome to DriverPacks.net
922 2010-11-12 18:18:17
Re: driverpacks with unattended (11 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
you are getting close now.
that nvidia problem was reported by another user you should be able to search our forum for that fix.
yes if you use SAD from a network location you will need the mass chipset and LAN drivers included with autoimage. if you can get autoimage to work then don't sweat the SAD method . Although SAD over the network will work great for updating a running machine if you are serviceing a unit
. you may also find that it will take less total time to deploy by adding mass lan and chipset with AI, then calling SAD over the network for the remaining drivers, this would also avoid the 4 gig limit issue you fixed above (well done)
Check out the universal imageing forum http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewforum.php?id=30 for some ideas about how to attack this issue there are several really good methods to choose from... the first one is very similar to your attempted KTD method BUT it calls the DriverPacks Finisher which makes a day and night difference for success. It also removes all the unneeded drivers from the machine after the deplyment . other posts explore SAD. SAD is also outlined in the FAQs.
if you have AutoImage working then you have the best solution for your needs in place... no need to over think it from there. I just tossed some other alternate options as an FYI in case you don't feel AI is the right fit for you.
No matter what you will need AutoImage to at least kick start your deployment.
Looking forward to seeing how this turns out...
Please let us know how you're progressing!
you may save many other people countless hours of work!
HINT: you wont need to reinstall driverpacks (except mass storage) after you get this working. You can simply substitute packs to update them .
923 2010-11-12 17:34:00
Re: How to Use devcon.exe ? (5 replies, posted in Other)
it creates two folders and a textfile
I386 folder contains the 32 bit version of devcon
IA64 folder contains the 64 bit version of devcon
Hint: double click on the one for your version of Windows Operating System (OS)
If you are not able to get that far on your own you need to seek help here http://www.msfn.org/
DriverPacks is not a noob friendly site, never has been and never will be. (this is clearly stated in our rules)
this forum is for the support of DriverPacks BASE and the DriverPacks only. Since your questions are not related to our app or our DriverPacks it is considered out of place. Mr_Smartepants asked you very nicely to learn to STFW. We will help a little with "other" questions and will allow some lattitude from time to time... But we will not hold your hand for you. I have pointed you to a site that will welcome you with open arms and will hold your hand for you . Thanks for visting our site and we will certainly welcome any DriverPacks related questions you may have in the future.
Have a great day
PS here is a link to help get you started with devcon, these are posts related to devcon at MSFN
http://www.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pu … project%2F
I had no trouble at all "searching the freaking web" (STFW) for Automating "6to4" Adapter Removal in Windows easily finding this http://ryanvictory.com/posts/automating … n-windows/
It's only a waste of our time if you don't make any attempt at all to help yourself
Since you apologized for doing so, i thought i would toss you a bone .
924 2010-11-12 17:20:50
Re: Universal Imaging Question (4 replies, posted in Universal Imaging)
no that solution will not be a universal image...
It will not install a huge number of the included drivers.
It might work on a very small number of machines at best and only of you don't include all the drivers.
and it will burn about 3gig of disk space for no reason.
Yes you MUST follow the instructions discussed in this forum... Years of trial and error by many experts in this method of deployment on thousands of machines have yeilded the results we have stickied as valid solutions. That is why they are there. PS this question has been asked answered many time before
925 2010-11-12 17:13:59
Re: e7221 intel driver for xp64 (8 replies, posted in Software)
Ah... NIce pickup Mr_S - I simply assumed based on his query that he had a 64 bit platform... My mistake
I am so glad you have my back! TY