Iuli_kyle wrote:
But this version doesn't appeard yet, right ...
It just has 
Time to update your translation already: http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=1116
576 2007-01-07 03:48:38
Re: Romanian language for DriverPacks Base 6.12 (9 replies, posted in Translations Team)
577 2007-01-07 03:48:15
Topic: Translation update required for DriverPacks BASE 7.01! (18 replies, posted in Translations Team)
Don't worry, it's just *one* entry!
I've now added the ability to translate the word "Translations" on the about page of the DriverPacks BASE. Just open the DriverPacks BASE with your current translations and it will automatically show which entry must be added.
Submit your translations via the bugtracker, as usual, and I will include them in version 7.01.1.
578 2007-01-07 03:13:48
Re: Romanian language for DriverPacks Base 6.12 (9 replies, posted in Translations Team)
Great! It's included in the 7.01 DriverPacks BASE!
579 2007-01-07 00:11:08
Re: [CLOSED] Update checker wont work.. (2 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
lightsout wrote:
Just checking - nothing related to the issue mentioned here is it?
Exactly.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
580 2007-01-07 00:10:01
Re: [NEEDSREPLY] DSPdsblr.exe not deleted error and notepad starting (6 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
The notepad-opening issue has been reported before, but due to its vagueness, it's still unresolved. The problem with DSPdsblr.exe not getting deleted is also very strange... Are you using method one or two?
581 2007-01-07 00:05:00
Re: [SOLVED BUG #298] [API mode only] AutoIt error: unknown function name (2 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Submitted to the bugtracker: http://bugtracker.driverpacks.net/view.php?id=298, and solved!
582 2007-01-06 23:59:38
Re: [SOLVED] "D" directory still exists after 6.12 Finisher ran (7 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Fragbert wrote:
After an unattended install, the "D" folder with all the drivers still exists (I think a bug fix listed for 6.12 was that this folder gets deleted?) Also a red error briefly flashes before the DP finisher finishes during RunOnceEX, but it was too quick to notice the text.
I set for method 2, no KTD, no stream cache.
I would like to post both my hwids.txt and DPsFnshr.log in code form but I get an error in this forum saying "posts cannot be longer that 65535 characters (64KB)."
Can't you post your DPsFnshr.log here? Is it LARGER than 64 KB? 
I really need that logfile to find the cause. Please submit an issue at the bugtracker and upload the file there. There's a much larger limit at the bugtracker, so that really should work.
583 2007-01-06 23:58:48
Re: [SOLVED BUG #297] MultibootDisc installation platform not working ... (4 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Submitted to the bugtracker: http://bugtracker.driverpacks.net/view.php?id=297 and solved!
584 2007-01-06 19:25:37
Re: [SOLVED BUG #296] Dutch UpdatePack not detected, which leads to ... (8 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Solved now!
585 2007-01-06 19:02:43
Re: [SOLVED BUG #295] Error: varriable used without being declared (13 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
In your logfile you can see all of your exceptions were disabled because none of the DriverPack directories were found. In other words, you haven't slipstreamed any DriverPacks... or at least they're not available anymore when the Finisher is ran.
This causes the $exceptions array to not exist, while it actually should exist. The code is there, but it was at the wrong place. I will be testing this now.
EDIT: verified working.
586 2007-01-06 06:19:16
Re: [SOLVED BUG #296] Dutch UpdatePack not detected, which leads to ... (8 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
zilexa wrote:
No it does not...
I am using the Dutch updatepack by MEULC: http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.p … 9d0bff8711When I check the contents of his updatepack, I cannot find a file named RVMUPPCK either. I do find MEULCPCK.IN_
Could that be it?
Then that's the cause. MeulC always kept on using "RVMUPPCK.IN_", so he must have decided to change that in his most recent release.
Will be fixed in the next update.
587 2007-01-06 04:02:47
Re: [SOLVED BUG #295] Error: varriable used without being declared (13 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
@theSLug: thanks for the logfile, looking at it right now.
588 2007-01-05 21:47:29
Re: Romanian language for DriverPacks Base 6.12 (9 replies, posted in Translations Team)
Iuli_kyle wrote:
i'm registered there !!! Really
Ok, you've now got updater permissions. Now you should create a new issue, entitle it "Romanian translation added" (every time you will update it in the future, entitle it "Romanian translation updated"), assign it to yourself, mark it as resolved and set the field "solved in version" to the next version, which is in this case 7.01.
Thanks for the translation!
589 2007-01-05 21:42:39
Re: [SOLVED BUG #296] Dutch UpdatePack not detected, which leads to ... (8 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
zilexa wrote:
Sorry I wasn't that clear, I slipstreamed Ryan's Update Pack NL, KB883667 NL and DirectX december Sereby's Update.
Huh? Then RyanVM's UpdatePack should definitely have been detected! Can you verify that the file I386/RVMUPPCK.IN_ exists?
590 2007-01-04 02:00:36
Re: Romanian language for DriverPacks Base 6.12 (9 replies, posted in Translations Team)
Please register at the bugtracker, I'll grant you 'updater rights' and then your work will be listed in the changelog!
591 2007-01-04 01:58:28
Re: [SOLVED BUG #297] MultibootDisc installation platform not working ... (4 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
MdRaGoN wrote:
I still need a work-around, can I do it another way?
Download an older version of the BASE program which had these scripts included seperatly?
You could use DriverPacks BASE 6.10 temporarily.
592 2007-01-04 01:57:12
Re: [SOLVED BUG #296] Dutch UpdatePack not detected, which leads to ... (8 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
It is assumed that this hotfix is slipstreamed by the DriverPacks BASE unless a file is detected that identifies an UpdatePack, i.e. RyanVM's, Sereby's, hp38gusers's or the Russian (don't remember the creator, it was something like "PetyaV4Sechkin").
As a work-around you could create a RVMUPPCK.INF file in your I386 directory.
So how did you slipstream all these updates WITHOUT an UpdatePack?
593 2007-01-04 01:53:47
Re: [SOLVED BUG #295] Error: varriable used without being declared (13 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Please all post your DPsFnshr.log, so we can trace where the cause lies!
594 2007-01-04 01:52:52
Re: [SOLVED] DP_LAN_wnt5_x86-32_612.7z wrong filename (9 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
Moved to DriverPack LAN forum.
595 2007-01-02 23:09:35
Re: [SOLVED BUG #297] MultibootDisc installation platform not working ... (4 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Thanks for the bugreport. Please submit this bug to the bugtracker!
596 2007-01-02 23:06:17
Re: DriverPack SlipStream effect on Driver.CAB & other Questions! (14 replies, posted in Other)
bhishmar wrote:
3. I see you are including two MS hotfixes along with Bst-base(KB888111 & KB921401). Both of them are already there in the latest RVMUpdatePack-Ver-2.1.5a (Dec-17,2006). When using RVM Integrator-1.4.2, and then slipstreaming BST-Pack, is there any clash due to this duplication? Pls Clarify?
You must slipstream the DriverPacks AFTER you've slipstreamed an UpdatePack. If an UpdatePack is detected, the DriverPacks BASE won't slipstream any hotfixes.
bhishmar wrote:
I have a question regarding
(a) Suppose first i remove all the (printer + scanner + modem ) drivers from the driver/sp2.cab in the xp-sp2-source. ( I am using Removal addons from ENu_User with RVM Integrator).
(b) Then I slipstream all the BST-3rdpartydriverpacks for (printer, scanner, modem).
The resulting source at the end, whether it will be uptodate? w.r.to the printer/scanner drivers i mean.
Or will it be missing any vital drivers?
I cannot speak for this, since I didn't make those DriverPacks: they're unofficial!
598 2007-01-01 01:47:14
Topic: DriverPacks BASE 6.12 (3 replies, posted in News)
Finally, an update for the DriverPacks BASE! We're now at version 6.12. Several minor improvements and bugfixes were submitted by ruudboek for the DriverPacks Finisher, which should thanks to him now be virtually bugfree!
You can find the changelog at the bugtracker.
Unfortunately there's some bad news too: it seems a flaw has managed to get into the previous version of the DriverPacks BASE, which causes the automatic updater to fail. The consequence is that you'll have to download & install this new version manually, you won't have to do this next time.
P.S.: if somebody is interested in being an active developer for the DriverPacks BASE, contact me (admin [at] driverpacks [dot] net). So far nobody has even started adding/improving things, at least afaik. Only ruudboek has, and that's the Finisher, not the BASE. As soon as I can find at least one relatively active contributor for the BASE, everything will become truly open source (as in: everything accessible for everybody), the reason for this is to guarantee quality, as explained in the open sourcing announcement.
599 2006-12-31 11:36:22
Re: [SOLVED] How to install the ATI graphics drivers without CCC or CCP? (3 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
SBacklin wrote:
Bâshrat the Sneaky wrote:SBacklin wrote:Is there a way to just install the graphics card driver(s) without the CCC or CCP?
Currently that's not an option available from the GUI. You have 2 options to accomplish this:
1) extract DriverPack Graphics A, delete ATICCC.exe and ATICCP.exe from the D\G\A\1 directory and then 7-zip everything again
2) remove the relevant sections from the DPsFnshr.ini fileCan you possibly point out which sections of the DPsFnshr.ini file to remove?
The ones that have
D-G-A-1in their section names.
600 2006-12-31 07:28:14
Re: [SOLVED] How to install the ATI graphics drivers without CCC or CCP? (3 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
SBacklin wrote:
Is there a way to just install the graphics card driver(s) without the CCC or CCP?
Currently that's not an option available from the GUI. You have 2 options to accomplish this:
1) extract DriverPack Graphics A, delete ATICCC.exe and ATICCP.exe from the D\G\A\1 directory and then 7-zip everything again
2) remove the relevant sections from the DPsFnshr.ini file