should be fixed now http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 633#p19633

fixed http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 633#p19633

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 633#p19633

4,304

(9 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 633#p19633

4,305

(2 replies, posted in Other)

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=521

4,306

(41 replies, posted in Other)

Wim said that our host belives we are back to normal now...

Downloads should be available on our original mirrors.

hopefully this is behind us now...

I have done that if you have a fast PIII and a good amount of ram it works fine...

no dont choose the repair option.... pretend you are going to do a clean install - jsut till you get to the selection screen..

I really don't think you are paying attention to what i am saying.

"It is very likely that reusing the same source caused some corruption of your txtsetup and dosnet files.
Especially if you made any changes to your source after driverpacks. IE adding patches / hotfixes."

by running RVM after running driverpacks you can no longer run the driverpacks again.

RVM updates dosnet and txtsetup. then when you run driverpacks the dosnet and txtsetup get restored to their original files (from before driverpacks were added the first time) this removes all entries created by RVM on the second run. (because those entries dont exist in the backed up files.)

YOU CAN'T DO THIS - IT WILL NOT WORK - this will corrupt your files.

you must uninstall driverpacks first or start with a clean source.

I make copys of my source at each stage - in this way i can update patches then make a copy and run DriverPacks on the copy. if i wish to update the packs i just reuse the copy if i must add patches i update the original and then make a new copy and add DriverPacks to that copy. In this way I can make sure that DriverPacks is always last

We state often and loudly that DriverPacks must be the LAST step in your process.

you ran RVM and driverpacks after running the driverpacks. this will not work.
(DriverPacks was NOT last in your process you ran RVM afterwards (and then DriverPacks a second time))
you can only run DriverPacks again if nothing else has been done since the last time you ran DriverPacks.

DriverPacks MUST BE LAST and your source is now corrupted and useless

if you pretend that you are going to install windows - will it find the HDD in text mode (at the partition selection screen)

It is very likely that reusing the same source caused some corruption of your txtsetup and dosnet files.
Especially if you made any changes to your source after driverpacks. IE adding patches / hotfixes.

4,310

(9 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)

what is really strange is the leech warning doesn't come up on your direct link...

Bâshrat the Sneaky is actively working on a solution...

LOL  ... It's just gone... hee hee

please check out Microsoft's DPinst

this tool is now included with the RC version of base
(available on the home page - read the news artical)

with this tool it is possible to update windows with the driverpacks from a mounted drive.
hint - take a look at the DP_Install_Tool.cmd - you may not even need to modify it to work for you.

also many people use KTD to accomplish what you are doing... (the result is identical)

You did not indicate if you were adding KB921401 to your installation files?
(it updates / patches portcls.sys) and may be the root of your problem.

PS yes... your method is NOT supported wink

however JakeLD and some of our other regulars are sysprep gurus and may have more for you.
Personally i would rather shoot myself than use sysprep. it is awful. i have said very often on this forum that there isn't anything you can do with sysprep that I can't do without it in half the time. but I'll still help wink

4,313

(3 replies, posted in Other)

I put my real name on these projects...
I am a contributer for UBCD4Win
I am a coder here and with siginet for RVM Integrator.
siginet puts his real name on his projects and he is a coder here as well.

We are real people who put our personal names and reputations on these projects.

DriverPacks, RyanVM, and nLite have been around for years. Google the names.
If malware were involved with our projects wouldn't someone have reported it?

My advise would be to find a mentor who isn't a noob.
(if he hasn't heard of these projects then he is a noob)[and has conspiracy issues]

like i said if your not sure we have been around for a long time google us...
run a virus scan
run a spyware scan
run a trojan scan

then tell you buddy he needs to learn his job.
because if he didnt tell you what i just did he is an idiot.
(and a noob)

the Request for Comments Base program 8.04.17.RC is on a different server.
go to the home page and use that link for downloading a newer base.

please use serach in future http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=521

4,316

(1 replies, posted in Other)

please use serach in future http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=521

please use serach in future http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=521

Always include your DPs_BASE.log -
Since you did not I have no idea which version of base you are useing. I will therefore assume it is 8.04.17.RC

portcls is one of the files included in KB921401...

this may be a problem if:

you do not have sp4 installed in your source before DriverPacks

if you are useing an updater other than RVM integrator.

if you added patches after DriverPacks - then attempt to reslipstream DriverPacks.


try a clean source and report...
this may need to be addressed in the base progam (possable bug).

this is the fourth or fifth time this has been reported and has been fixed by avast several times
if you are using the latest definitions then report it to avast as a false positive - not to us...

AVG has also reported mute as a virus and they have updated their definitions successfully.
there is nothing we can do - this must be reported to the offending (offensive?) company

please update your definitions... double check that the problem still exists and report to avast as a "False Positive".

Please choose a good title in the future I belive 'Base' was not detected as a virus - 'mute.exe' was?

This can now be done easily

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2264

this indicates that the base program was unable to remove the previous slipstream of the driverpacks.

Use a clean source... that one is no longer healthy (your source is corrupt)

4,322

(61 replies, posted in News)

Proxy was in the RC2 release notes (below the current news item)

Thanks chiners. I know that one was of personal interest to you...

I also had confirmation from Echo_Platoon that it was working for him too...
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 147#p19147

Have a great day and thanks for posting! (ps gave you the props in first post)

4,323

(76 replies, posted in News)

Fixed
thanks DOlivas !

4,324

(61 replies, posted in News)

Thanks D!

It's fixed...

4,325

(76 replies, posted in News)

RC3 is up on the home page for testing...

http://driverpacks.net