i think it's dirty because the log says it needed cleaned up.

it may have come from a clean source at one time but it was not clean when you ran BASE on it.
all sources are clean when copied from a valid disc. once copied from the original read only media they may or may not be clean any more. If you do this copy yourself then you know exactly where you are starting from.

again...
Start with a clean copy from a MS hologramed disc.  I notice you did not say that is what you did.
you said "As far as I know, my source is an original Windows XP Professional disc/iso file."
That means your source is suspect.

If you start with a known clean source then i think you will no longer have an issue.

Let's put it this way millions of other users do this with no problem....
what is different with your situation? The source for one...
One problem identified. start there.

according to the net a digeridoo is a musical instrument
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC9w4KWEgJE

the entries are removed from the registry before you are presented the desktop. The the DriverPacks Finisher does this automatically.

you would need to check to see if they are there before the computer reboots to the GUI.
(or disable the finisher)

There isn't a reason that this should fail for you except that the BASE log indicates that your source is not totally clean.

Please try again with a "Clean" source. (Read - fresh copy of original hologramed Microsoft disc)
Additionally most of us slipstream SP3 into our install... but that is not mandatory.

Jeff

any Ideas about what? You did not state any question, nor specific issue.

Please post your DPs_BASE.log

also please read "Read BEFORE you post" linked in my signature.
*you also agreed that you read this when you signed up.

The search feature is also very useful.

Please also note that "Stickied" Topics can be quite useful...
Like this one in this subforum directly above your topic.
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=5081

IN Addition there is this post in the FAQ section of our site
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4446

We have been around almost ten years ... ALMOST ANY question you may have is already addressed here somewhere big_smile.

PS Devpath is not meant to be run after the install.

Thanks cdob,

that is the same suggestion you made years ago for the same issue we were having with empty card readers in our PreSetup.cmd file that we use for automating the NT5 (XP,  2K and 2K3) installs. I guess mr_smartepants forgot about that.

Of course we use a simpler implementation.

SET TAGFILE=\OEM

FOR %%i IN (C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y) DO DIR %%i: && IF EXIST "%%i:%TAGFILE%" SET CDDRIVE=%%i:& GOTO DPsFound

:DPsFound

The IF EXIST command fails / crashes if an empty card reader is encountered, the DIR command does not.

Thanks for the reminder... and drat you beat me to it big_smile.

he's already my hero, has been for many years.

i wrote a program a couple years ago to pull the hwids out of the infs i spent several weeks on it and never did get 100% success on listing the HWIDs. Some were always missing because of differences in the way the INF files were layed out. especially where variables were used.

the current version of that is used by mr_smartepants when he publishes a new release. It populates the "included drivers" field on the download pages. Kickarse also has a tool for that that is published here on our forum.

you are not allowed to delete duplicate HWIDS... that definitely will fail.

I think you are mistaking a copy for what is actually extraction from the archives.

Method 2 or M2 as we call it extracts the 7zip archives to c:\d that does take a minute.
    (however since i am doing an unattended install
     i don't care if it takes two minutes or four minutes
     since i am not actually there... i am doing something else... 
     (UNATTENDED) tongue.)

Method 1 or M1 as we refer to it is pre-extracted so there is no copy or extraction.
it would simply run straight from the thumb drive.
- Test with an M1 source and see how long it takes... smile

When we headed down this road before we had many obsticals. not the least of which was exceeding the maximum number of elements in an array. (it would silently truncate input). a couple of other projects have set out on this same mission. They also have space here at DriverPacks.net. What we ended up doing in the short term was to split the stream in the packs themselves. In this way you can extract the inf files as a single stream. (our solid archive is actually two solid archives one with infs and one with all the other stuff). this makes gettitng the infs very fast big_smile. the rest is very buggy. your theory is solid, and if our OS was not windows would have easily succeeded years ago.  Again a good idea tried many times by several projects. . .

I think with the onset of cheap fast thumb storage its just easier to run an M1 (pre extracted) SAD off the thumb.

Try the RC... http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=6622

Mass storage does work at the first stage of setup as well as the second wink

try a different version of mass storage... either older or the release candidate that is floating around in the mass storage forum. *you are here

If it doesn't break anything, then we can have a release candidate / test pack hanging around

but i think it does create some un-needed SIF entries [garbage lines]

Idealy i add support for chipset files and add the windows update from BASE... this works for testing and getting feedback

Remember mass storage text mode is hard coded. no PnP no WHQL, Nothin nada zippo...

whatever HWID you specify for a driver will force that driver to be used. (obviously only if that hwid exists in the system)
Hard coded. you could assign a sound card driver and it would attempt to load it tongue.

very simple in theory. the main point is you only need to pick one that works long enough to partition and transfer files. then the PnP driver will replace it on the reboot. big_smile

BartPE and UBCD4Win and other PE based tools are based on windows textmode setup which is more properly referred to as the Preinstallation Environment or simply P.E.

i know it really confused me too when cdob and hilander999 dragged me into the mire. Best advice i can give you is forget everything you know about windows... start there big_smile tongue

Thanks for the update... appreciated

TechDud wrote:

...  and the answer is Yescdob's plugin likely worked, as disabling MegaSR & MegaIDE allowed XP to install.  smile

Will narrow this down later.  MegaSR or 'MegaPITA'.  There can be only one.  hmm


"THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE"
couldn't have said it any better.

If there are any duplicate HWIDs in there chaos is the result... especially if it conflicts with a native driver

Native drivers require you to use "Replace" tags wink
you can* only replace a native driver if it is fully backward compliant.

* (read 'should', because you can do that, just not the preferred choice)

TechDud wrote:

   ... or an error like a "ms_1_exc_disableIfOS="w2k"" where it ought not be.  shouldn't i just comment all of those?
skip_if_OS seems effective.

no because if you do that will enable them on win2k and win2k will crash on boot because of out of memory.
the advantage to this method is that the SIF file entries are created with a semi colon in front of them, Win2K will ignore a line with a lead semicolon. An admin can open a ISO file edit the SIF file with notepad and change a couple semi colons and punch out a disk without re installing the DriverPacks with DriverPacks BASE. Quick easy and clean. So it has a purpose even if it is for a very old platform.

TechDud wrote:

truely wishing i had built that UBCD4Win disc now........

you still should... it also has memcheck built in tongue

TechDud wrote:

Has anyone an archive of DP_MassStorage_wnt5-x86_901.7z ?

of course http://www.adaptivepc.com/DP_MassStorag … -32_901.7z

blah blah blah

DriverPacks.net not tech support . com  tongue

way to dig in and take the time to research that... punch out test DriverPack MassStorage... Awesome.

can we have a link to the known good working driver?

That may help us to help you, we can compare the working driver with which driver is enabled in the DriverPack MassStorage.

yes if this is a PnP=5 issue it's going to require a patch to get working...

one of our users posted the fix for that here some time ago... i couldn't find it last night.

We probably need to do some code
to make a device whos driver specifies that it is a PnP mode only device
and then make it work in textmode.

It requires a registry entry... (read Hive edit)
this is an issue we resolved before, i forgot how.

i sent cdob a forum e-mail and asked him to pop in, hope it did not end up in his spam folder big_smile.

TechDud wrote:

Do i need to use a virgin source and not a source with OnePiece's Updates integrated?

Best source is a clean sp2 retail or volume hologram-ed disc. i have been successful with sp3 but not recommended.
Definitely do NOT use a modified source, this will result in fails at different points for an assortment of reasons.


TechDud wrote:

Also, if i enable more than one driver at a time, what prevents differing files with the same name from being overwritten?

the smoke and the mirrors tongue.
Build it and take a peek at the plugin folders big_smile.

nothing better than factory default settings... especially the date, my favorite.


Crap... it's one of those...

forgot where the directions were to fix PnP=5 in PE...

CDOB!

Wow lot's to cover...

klhpraise wrote:

What is warez... ?

A Good answer to the question...

klhpraise wrote:

PEBuilder logs shows 3 warnings and no errors.

Warning: building from an OEM version of Windows can mean trouble...
Warning: Creating ISO-9660:1999 (version 2) filesystem.
Warning: ISO-9660 filenames longer than 31 may cause buffer overflows in the OS.
Building done...
There where 0 errors and 1 warnings

well that is not perfect,

you already said you knew there were obstacles to building with an OEM disc.
It is always best to build BartPE with a clean Retail (or VL) Hologramed XP SP2 source.
I have had almost no issues with using SP3 source... but SP2 is recommended.
I trust that you addressed the known issues with your source...

the second two errors should be correctable.

R U building with ubcd4win?
It is unlikely that a UBCD4Win build would have either of those issues logged.
I believe post processing would have corrected both of them before image creation.
I do recommend that you do use UBCD4Win if you are not using it.
MUCH easier for a beginner big_smile. It is specifically written to make it "mistake and omission resilient".

klhpraise wrote:

TechDud,
This is all new to me! The only reason I am moving down this road is to attempt to restore my computer back to the way it was in July when I was able to successfully make an image of the hard drive.  To get it back to functioning the way it was long before the attack I  described above. I was told it was very easy task to this restore the hard drive from the image file, yet it has been nothing of the sort. The Boot disks I have attempted to create to restore this image has all failed as I described in earlier posts.

klhpraise

An easier way might be to just use an older dpms version that has that older driver... than to edit the current one. But either way it works.

easier still...
your machine should have a restore partition with a factory image on it...
you should be able to launch the restore process from your BartPE disk. (it's just like safemode)
you might also find that you can restore this factory image from the boot menu options.
(lots of manufacturers do this. Check their support site for factory restore or Recovery... you might also try OOBE)

First we definitely don't support warez... so let's not let that happen again, there are plenty of legitimate torrents to test.

second your DPs_BASE.log says you do have a firewall
2013-03-16 20:50:54 : <GUI>  DNS for DriverPacks.net failed
2013-03-16 20:50:54 : <GUI>  DNS for DriverPacks.net failed

internet access is denied...

So something is fire walling you.


Looks like your BASE load built the plugins... Was your PEBuilder log without errors?

ubcd4win has HWPnP included by default...

The nice thing about UBCD4Win is, it is all done already, it's in there and the bugs all ironed out... tongue.
perfect for testing DriverPacks, if it works on UBCD4Win but not PE then they are missing a plugin (prolly HWPnP) big_smile.

no you don't need desk.cpl,
again because UBCD4Win is complete and already includes a tool for setting the screen resolution big_smile.

run BASE in Bartpe mode with graphics (and Mass Storage and LAN) enabled.

run pebuilder, check plugins to make sure they exist and are enabled, build, burn, test.

tutorial linked in my signature... lol

yes your ICH7 is perfect... try to select a screen resolution above 1024x768 with 32bit color while in UBCD4Win. My guess is you can't.  if you build the graphics plugin with Intel enabled in the INI then you can...



yes exactly... big_smile Good to know we have to include DriverPack Graphics B and DriverPack Graphics C, all the more reason to archive a copy of the output big_smile.