Search options (Page 14 of 213)

IDK if removing them is worth the effort... if you think it is then OK

simple is better, stable is best.

it has to do with unresolved conflicts... you only need them if you have the specific issue it addresses (rare).

happy holidays and merry Christmas and to all a happy new year

Q) how did the ISO get on the HDD?
A) it was copied (same as the CD)

in the end the same amount of data was written to the HDD.
So that is not a valid argument.

Can we use an ISO instead of file system? Maybe.

Why would we?
All of the other tools for NT5 require a file system and do not interact with ISO images.
That would mean most users would not want or need it since every other step in preparing an image requires it to be extracted and on a read / write device IE a HDD.

it's not a bad idea, it just does not go with the flow of broadly accepted existing tools and procedures.
and at this point i don't see any of the top players rewriting code for a ten year old OS that expires next year.

I could be wrong.

Jeff

That is a lot of data to copy for no reason.
One of our users once demonstrated that a copy and extract was faster on a ODD. I don't think the same is true for a thumb drive.

and the first post says see the last post LOL... 

go ahead and try that

Hiya Samlab 

I was just talking about not having seen you the other day...

http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 190#p54190

Good to see you~!

Welcome to my world, it feels worse when it's thousands of DL's.
I have come to realize that no feedback = working perfect.
People will definitely show up to bitch if it's broke .

Sounds like you nailed it Bigfoot

you could just name the pack(s) with a valid NT5 name and run BASE on it in SAD mode

then you can see how much space is saved and test that the existing method is also valid for NT6.

and not have to write any code ...   Quick and easy

I'm trying to carve out some time for updating BASE SAD and Finisher soon. if it works with the test above then i can code it fast and easy to just do nt6 packs. i can also add and remove extensions from the list, or add exceptions for specific files / folders.
Jeff

not only do they both work,
they quite easily compliment each other with  just a hint of collaboration.

Sam was that link for a long time, i never understood why more did not submit work and ideas, and provide the feedback of their experiences.

   T ogether
w E
   A chieve
   M ore

Good to see you compstuff !

Hi Anna,

The original poster (or OP) of this thread is pretty awesome.

A. He posted in English, not his native language.
B. He posted that he had read a tutorial, and linked to the one he used. (you might follow that link)
C. He posted some details, the model of the machine and the HWIDs (NICE)
He got all the way through using our DriverPacks BASE with DriverPacks, integrating drivers and testing his work.

He failed to mention what OS, Which version of DriverPacks BASE, which DriverPacks versions, (Or his DPs_BASE.log which includes all that).   But hey over eighty percent on his first post is rockin along pretty darn good. Remember all our help is in english too, which means he learned all this in a foreign language too.

---------------------------------------------

look at the links in mr_smartypants and my posts for help to get started.
try first, then when (if) you get stuck go ahead and ask= but refer to :Read BEFORE you post:

Start your own thread. Don't hijack someone else's.

It will extract on a non intel computer, it won't install.
A search of our forum will yield the answer to   that problem.

the OEM (Original manufacturer) should offer the f6 driver that you seek all by itself .
unless your OS is not supported by them for that MB.

Of course we will, Should be quite easy since i have added no patches for SP3 in DriverPacks BASE. I may need to write code to acknowledge it's presence, or not.

ryan's, msfn, 911, etc are long time friends and contributors of DriverPacks.net, please keep us in the loop.

Jeff