Strange, that card (fx 5200) is supported in the nv4_go.inf. Do you have driver signing disabled? Because that inf isn't signed.
*Edit, And that HWID is dup'd in the new DriverPack Graphics B nightly. I guess I have more work to do.
I'm going to disable that HWID in DriverPack Graphics A since the older cards don't react too well with the new drivers.
3,251 2008-10-12 06:18:06
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
3,252 2008-10-08 16:07:22
Re: [IMPL] Intel Matrix Storage v8.6.0.1007 10/12/2008 (117 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
OverFlow wrote:
is that somthing we could add to a folder (its own perhaps) then call from the finisher useing +hwids ?
There's no reason I can think of why it wouldn't work. I've been pulling off some crazy stuff with the DriverPacks Finisher 
3,253 2008-10-07 06:22:26
Re: DriverPacks BASE 8.09.rc1 - We need your comments, Please! (33 replies, posted in News)
Ooohhh, ummm, errrr. Well, you can try it. I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't work.
As long as you also include the unattended switches.
3,254 2008-10-07 06:03:29
Re: DriverPacks BASE 8.09.rc1 - We need your comments, Please! (33 replies, posted in News)
Fly,
those are one and the same 
\$OEM$\cmdlines.txt is the way entries are made to be executed during RunOnceEx.
GUIRunOnce requires entries in a different area but both occur during the same step in setup.
3,255 2008-10-05 17:18:20
Re: Is this file necessary? (6 replies, posted in DriverPack LAN)
Also, just because a file isn't referenced in the sourcediskfiles section, doesn't mean it's not needed. Sometimes that file may be called by an .exe (the .exe may be referenced) during install.
This is poor QA on the vendors part.
3,256 2008-10-05 06:13:35
Re: [IMPL] Intel chipset drivers v9.1.0.1012 WHQL (19 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Hah! 
3,257 2008-10-03 16:28:01
Topic: [REQ] Logo needed for DriverPacks BASE & favicon for website (54 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
I don't know if anyone has noticed or not but we have no official logo for either the website or the DriverPacks BASE application.
We need some graphics artists to come up with ideas (I can draw stick-figures, but that's the extent of my artistic skills).
This is your chance for fame and recognition!
3,258 2008-10-03 15:58:05
Re: [IMP] ATI Rage 128 Pro DELL - PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5046&SUBSYS_0404xxxx (14 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OverFlow wrote:
DriverPack Graphics B jeff mod (ludicrous speed)
ROFL
Ludicrous speed? Well that's just ludicrous!
I'll make sure this gets added to the next nightly.
3,259 2008-10-03 15:55:01
Re: [SLV] Duplicates, Duplicates... did I say duplicates! (15 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
There's already a thread for that problem in the "Testing Team" area.
Thanks Kay, we're already aware of the problem.
3,260 2008-10-03 03:18:01
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OK, so I have DriverPack Graphics A 810rc1 built and ready to go (not online yet). It's rock solid for me.
Right now it is EN-US ONLY for both ATI and Nvidia.
Additional language support and PhysX are added with 3rd party DriverPacks.
My question to everyone is what to name the language dp?
The available options are:
1. DP_Languages_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_810rc1 (compresses down to DP_Langu.7z)
2. DP_Graphics_A_Languages_wnt5_x86-32_810rc1 (compresses down to DP_Graph.7z)
Any other suggestions? I'm all ears.
This will become final this weekend barring any showstopping bugs.
3,261 2008-10-02 06:59:45
Re: drivers not getting picked up on dell laptop (1 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
You'll need to post your log files as explained in this thread:
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=4#p4
We need that info before we can help you.
3,262 2008-10-01 03:07:43
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Put them both in the 3rd party folder, then integrate with DriverPacks BASE.
Updated first post with instructions.
3,263 2008-09-30 16:25:51
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
I'm also going to try removing the languages from N1 and add to the CCC_lang dp (dp to be renamed) so the G_A dp is en-us only, then language support can be added as an extra dp.
3,264 2008-09-30 02:30:54
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Glad to be of service Sir!
First post updated.
3,265 2008-09-29 06:00:28
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
rc3 included beta drivers. rc4 (now online) has the final WHQL package.
3,266 2008-09-27 04:58:44
Re: [IMPL] Intel GMA driver package 6.14.10.5404 (Z7x/B77/H77support) (54 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OK, once I get G_A rc4 out the door, I'll be all over G_B updates!
3,267 2008-09-27 04:58:02
Re: FindHWIDS v3.2s - The INF Searching, Hardware ID Exporter (353 replies, posted in Software)
kickarse wrote:
boring Crystal Reports XI training.
Lord isn't that the truth!
3,268 2008-09-27 02:42:19
Re: [SLV] Duplicates, Duplicates... did I say duplicates! (15 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
Without checking the .infs myself, my guess would be there are different reg entries (apart from the obvious w2k, w2k3, xp diffs)
3,269 2008-09-27 02:39:14
Re: FindHWIDS v3.2s - The INF Searching, Hardware ID Exporter (353 replies, posted in Software)
Wow, you're working so hard, you're making the rest of us look slow!
3,270 2008-09-26 04:49:18
Re: [IMPL] nVIDIA GeForce 178.13 Release (3 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Yes, and PhysX is back as a standalone installer!
3,271 2008-09-24 06:22:40
Re: DriverPacks BASE 8.09.rc1 - SAD - Didn't find my drivers (10 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Well, apart from the release DriverPacks (which are months out of date), I can't see anything that really stands out (apart from one glaring omission).
So let me get this straight.
1. You created the S.A.D directory and let BASE do it's thing to the following directory.
location= "C:\Documents and Settings\me\Desktop\Drivers"
2. (here's where it gets fuzzy) You burned "C:\Documents and Settings\me\Desktop\Drivers" to CD/DVD.
3. You inserted S.A.D. CD/DVD into target system and executed %CDROM%\DriverPacks.net\DP_Install_Tool.cmd
If you didn't do those steps (especially 3), S.A.D won't work. Also, method 2 leaves all the DriverPacks compressed in .7z packages. Windows can't use those by default.
3,272 2008-09-24 03:00:12
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
newsposter wrote:
changelog? I'm interested in the size differences between the last few nightlies......
The only difference between rc2 and rc3 are:
Added HWIDs to A1\mobility.inf
Added 25MB worth of language/locale files to A1\CCC\help & CCC\localization.
TiGer-X wrote:
now i'm testing on the notebook ASUS F8Sv.
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0407&SUBSYS_16321043&REV_A1\4&395D415B&0&0008: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
You should have zero problems! But please report back if you do.
3,273 2008-09-23 16:31:16
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
OK, NOW both mirrors are online.
3,274 2008-09-23 15:55:33
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
TiGer-X wrote:
Mirror #1: (uploading now) http://dev.driverpacks.thesneaky.com/dr … _809rc3.7z
文件: E:\Downloads\DriverPacks\DP_Graphics_A_wnt5_x86-32_809rc3.7z 大� : 47587397 å—节 修改时间: 2008å¹´9月22æ—¥, 21:50:42 MD5: 413CAFB003D8E64043CE05CE9D73BD07 SHA1: 97A647EE77112689C0D940387DCBBF2125BB1EAF CRC32: A48E93D2The archive is either in unknown format or damaged.
Mirror #1: (uploading now) http://dev.driverpacks.thesneaky.com/dr … _809rc3.7z
So the "uploading now" part didn't throw you off?
It's STILL uploading (our 'official' nightly server is SOOOO slow). Mirror #2 is good though.
3,275 2008-09-23 07:47:56
Re: Graphics A 8.09rc4 for testing purposes (REPORTS wanted) (280 replies, posted in DriverPack Graphics)
Excellent news! Thank you TiGer-X for your report.
I'll update the first post.
DriverPack Graphics A Release Candidate #3 is now online. I need non-english testers to test ATICCC in their native language (added localization files).
The finish-line is in sight!