Ra wrote:
Please add
ThinkPad Power Management driver
That's already in the Third Party DriverPack "Misc"
552 2012-03-05 19:26:17
Re: [IMPL] IT8211 ATA RAID Driver (19 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Implemented for 12.03 release (in testing)
553 2012-03-05 18:41:26
Re: [IMPL] jmraid 36x /jmraid 37x no IDE-Driver (4 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Implemented for 12.03 release (in testing)
554 2012-03-05 18:40:13
Re: [SLVD]GA-890FXA-UD7/GIGABYTE SATA2 Driver and NEC USB 3.0 Driver (2 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Yes, they are included.
Please try DriverPacks before you post requests.
555 2012-03-05 04:43:57
Re: [SLVD] Problem with 12.02 (14 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Here's a great reference from Microsoft regarding loading drivers in an offline image.
Driver Ranking
One of the most common issues in deploying drivers occurs when a driver is successfully imported into the driver store but, after the system is online, Plug and Play finds a higher-ranking driver and installs that driver instead.
The Windows PnP manager ranks the following driver package properties in order of importance:
1. Signing
2. Plug and Play ID match
3. Driver date
4. Driver version
For example, if a device has a better Plug and Play ID match but is unsigned, a signed driver with a compatible ID match takes precedence. In addition, a newer driver can be outranked by an older driver if the older driver has a better Plug and Play ID match or signature.
556 2012-03-05 01:31:15
Re: [SLVD] Problem with 12.02 (14 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Well I just tried a win7 64 bit source on my USB drive with the $WinPEDriver$ at the root containing the 64 bit dpms (untouched) and the pre-setup (up to the drive selection) went without a problem at all. This is on my main tower (mentioned above).
I'll try again later with the 32 bit flavor.
557 2012-03-04 23:35:29
Re: [SLVD] Problem with 12.02 (14 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
OK, here's an example breakdown for the dpms 64-bit AHCI Intel drivers.
Unique HWIDs are in GREEN and duplicated HWIDs are in RED.
x64\All\M\Intel\1\iaAHCI.inf DriverVer=11/06/2010,10.1.0.1008
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2681&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C1&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C5&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2821&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2829&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2922&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2929&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3A02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3A22&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B29&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B2F&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B22&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1C02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1C03&CC_0106
x64\All\M\Intel\2\iaAHCI.inf DriverVer=10/17/2011,10.8.0.1003
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C1&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C5&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2922&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2929&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3A02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3A22&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B29&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B2F&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B22&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1C02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1C03&CC_0106
x64\All\M\Intel\3\iaAHCI.inf DriverVer=11/29/2011,11.0.0.1032
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C1&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C5&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2929&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3A02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3A22&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B29&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B2F&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3B22&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1C02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1C03&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1E02&CC_0106
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1E03&CC_0106
Now you would think that the logical action would be to remove folder \2 because it's duplicated between folders \1 & \3, BUT...not all the HWIDs in folder \2 are duplicated in the newer folder \3.
My motherboard has PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2922&CC_0106 which isn't supported by the newer folder \3. So my best match is folder \2. I wouldn't want to be stuck with the older driver if I didn't need to be and I'm not the only one that feels that way.
The 32-bit dpms is similar.
So if you can prove that one folder ON IT'S OWN fails, then we can remove it from the pack. One of the great things about the DriverPacks is that they are modular and you can add/delete/modify each one to suit your needs.
Looking at the IaStor drivers it's probably perfectly safe to remove the v10.8.0.1003 iastor.inf (and sundry) because it's a 100% duplicate with v11.0.0.1032
I'm sure that more testing is in order though.
*Edit
Oh, and editing the .inf will break driver signing and the Windows setup will use ANY other matching driver as long as it's signed. That's one of the quirks with driver signing is that setup will always default to a signed driver over any other driver.
*Edit 2
I'll try to confirm your bug on my system using your methods.
558 2012-03-04 20:11:42
Re: [SLVD] Problem with 12.02 (14 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Hmm, I'll have to take a closer look at the packs contents.
559 2012-03-04 05:33:15
Re: [IMPL] Chipset - Fresco Logic USB3 xHCI driver update (9 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Ah, I see what the download problem is now. You need to run IE as an administrator for the catalog.update.microsoft.com site to work. That's just dumb!
Rule #1 for safe internet browsing is "Never run ANY browser as an admin".
Anyway, got the downloads. They'll be in the next RC.
560 2012-03-04 04:40:10
Re: [IMPL] Chipset - Fresco Logic USB3 xHCI driver update (9 replies, posted in DriverPack Chipset)
Those links aren't working anymore. The download site keeps crashing.
561 2012-03-04 01:14:16
Re: [SLVD] Problem with 12.02 (14 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
Sorry, I got confused. I was looking at the 64-bit pack which is different than the 32-bit.
Yes, your HWID matches all the above drivers in the folders you mentioned.
What happens is the system will scan the available drivers, then select whichever meets all the below criteria (in this order):
1) Digitally signed
2) Matches the exact HWID
3) Newer than the others
4) Matches a partial HWID
So the only way for you to fix your particular problem is you know for certain that a newer driver doesn't work is to remove that driver from the pack (or don't integrate it).
562 2012-03-03 21:15:21
Re: Windows 7 Forum (15 replies, posted in Windows 7 Discussion)
marshalkerry57 wrote:
What is the extra advantages between windows 2 and windows 7?
5 ?
Oh, and spamming the forums gets you banned quick around these parts.
563 2012-03-03 20:15:03
Re: Windows XP Professional x64 (3 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
No. XP-64 will never have support at DriverPacks.net.
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2651
You CAN install XP-32 though and it will be very happy on your laptop (Acer may not support the downgrade though).
Win7-64 will be 500% better than XP and probably be fully supported by Acer as well.
564 2012-03-02 20:01:50
Re: [SLVD] Problem with 12.02 (14 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack Mass Storage)
That's an interesting problem and it's one that nobody else has reported.
I'm not certain that there is a problem with dpms itself or the method that you're using them. So I'll leave the thread here (we might move it to "Universal Imaging" later if it's appropriate).
Your HWID is supported in \All\M\Intel\3\iastor.inf but not folder 4. So that particular error related to folder 4 is very odd.
In practice, the "RAID" BIOS option should not be enabled unless you actually are running a RAID array. AHCI is the best option for single drives.
We need to look into this a little deeper, hopefully cdob or one of our other imaging pros will stop by for a chat.
565 2012-03-02 19:44:23
Re: [SLVD] \OEM\Bin\un7zip.exe (9 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
The "OEM Preinstall" option in nlite is in the "Unattended" settings under the "General" tab. It's not really intended for driver use but enables the use of the $OEM$ folder hierarchy. Ugh, I feel dirty now for having to open nlite.
566 2012-03-01 08:00:05
Re: Web site design (4 replies, posted in Software)
This thread is a spam-magnet. 
567 2012-02-29 18:41:00
Re: USB 3.0 Driverpack [x86-x64] (1 replies, posted in 3rd Party Vista / 7 DriverPacks)
Most of these are already in DriverPack Chipset 12.02
568 2012-02-29 18:38:46
Re: Packers help . . . ??!! (3 replies, posted in Software)
You didn't tell us what OS you're trying to install or what DriverPacks versions you tried.
The HWIDs are an important piece of the puzzle but not all.
If you're using XP, the camera is supported in DP_WebCam_wnt5_x86-32_1107\D\3\W\B1\BisonCam.inf
If you're using Win7, then it's possible that the Vista driver may work but we don't have it in our packs yet.
Try this link:
http://support.asus.com/Download.aspx?S … 3&s=41
Then select "Vista" as your OS, then click the "Camera" link and download Version V6.32.00.004
569 2012-02-29 18:17:50
Re: Printers x64 (8 replies, posted in 3rd Party Vista / 7 DriverPacks)
@Brent I fixed your link (forums don't like spaces in urls) but the FTP doesn't accept "deep linking".
You need to click here: ftp://94.31.243.65/
Then burrow down the folders as above.
570 2012-02-29 18:13:09
Re: [SLVD] Not able to setup windows (12 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
Are you sure the drive is OK? Because it's SATA, you can connect it natively to another PC for testing (I prefer SpinRite).
Once you're sure the drive itself is OK, check the BIOS to make sure the SATA ports are not in "legacy" or "IDE" mode but the preferred "AHCI" mode.
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C0&CC_0101
This HWID indicates that you have it in "legacy" mode and no textmode drivers are needed. Once you change the mode to "AHCI" or "RAID", the HWID should change to PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C*&CC_0104 or PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27C*&CC_0106
571 2012-02-28 18:34:21
Re: [REQ] WLAN - updated Broadcom drivers (18 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack WLAN)
I really hate how Broadcom splits their version numbers so it's possible to have a lower number version number with a current date. Stupid!
Implemented for DriverPack WLAN 12.02r2
12.02r2
- Added - (All) Broadcom\3 Broadcom BCM43xx 802.11a/b/g/n Network Adapter (from HP sp56154) DriverVer=10/26/2011, 5.100.82.112
572 2012-02-28 18:32:43
Re: [REQ] WLAN - Qualcomm/Atheros AR5xxx/AR9xxx Etc. (15 replies, posted in Vista / 7 DriverPack WLAN)
Implemented for DriverPack WLAN 12.02r2
12.02r2
- Update - (Vista) Atheros\3 Atheros AR500*/AR92** Family Wireless Network Adapter DriverVer = 12/23/2011,9.2.0.470
- Update - (Win7) Atheros\3 Atheros AR500*/AR92** Family Wireless Network Adapter DriverVer = 12/23/2011,9.2.0.470
573 2012-02-28 17:52:49
Re: [SLVD] New hardware build - does MassStorage Pack include drivers? (7 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
The drivers you link to are older than the ones that were finalized in dpms 11.11 (and future test packs).
Can you replace the files in the d\m\as\ folder with the ones from the download and confirm the modified pack works?
(let me know if you need me to repackage a test pack for you)
No need to edit the pack .ini.
If it works, I'll revert the drivers to the older ones.
574 2012-02-28 08:17:18
Re: Overwrite question (4 replies, posted in Other)
That's great if you have available space. SAD2 works that way too. We call it "Method 1". Though Method 1 still copies the files to the target system.
From the readme.txt
What goes where?
NT5\x86\
-Method-1: Use DriverPacks BASE to create a Method-1 SAD disc selecting the packs you want to include. By default, the folder "DriverPacks.net" will be created in C:\.
Copy the contents of that DriverPacks.net folder to this folder so that the folder heirarchy looks like this: \NT5\x86\D\.NT6\x64\
-Method-1: Extract the contents of all DriverPacks to the NT6\x64\D\ folder so that the folder heirarchy looks like this: \NT6\x64\D\*. Method 1 will fail if the \NT6\x64\ folder contains any .7z DriverPacks.NT6\x86\
-Method-1: Extract the contents of all DriverPacks to the NT6\x86\D\ folder so that the folder heirarchy looks like this: \NT6\x86\D\*. Method 1 will fail if the \NT6\x86\ folder contains any .7z DriverPacks.
Hmmm, I wonder if it'll run directly from the USB drive without copying to the target system first. <goes off to play with code...>
575 2012-02-28 07:14:45
Re: Packers help . . . ??!! (3 replies, posted in Software)
Welcome to DriverPacks.
First, read the FAQ.
Then read the "Read BEFORE you post." link in my signature.
We need you to provide your DPs_BASE.log and HWID list (use the HWID tool in my signature).
We can't help you unless you provide enough info.