yes if you want to be able to install TO the array it must be created first by the hardware (bios)...
Not all controllers support this in the firmware.
2,876 2009-01-13 06:29:07
Re: [Question] How to install to a RAID array? (4 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
2,877 2009-01-13 06:18:19
Re: HOWTO Reinstall Windows XP preserving personal data using DP BASE - pa (17 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
you didn't have to unstick it...
i was just saying it is deserving of so much more !
sorry what i said did not translate well!
2,878 2009-01-13 06:16:36
Re: Intel iastor drivers in MassStorage DriverPack v9.01 (3 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
the entries in mass storage INI are for txtmode only...
and txtmode does not use the infs... so waht they are named is not relevant
2,879 2009-01-13 06:09:16
Re: [Question] How to install to a RAID array? (4 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
yes you can install to an array...
as long as you can set up the array in the PC's hardware setup
2,880 2009-01-13 03:12:43
Re: [REL] [x86, 32 bit] ALL DriverPack's Repacked (246 replies, posted in 3rd Party DriverPacks)
But we all knew nothing at one point...
your catching up
2,881 2009-01-13 03:03:07
Re: [REL] [x86, 32 bit] ALL DriverPack's Repacked (246 replies, posted in 3rd Party DriverPacks)
NO!
Use the provided host!
- that is why we provide it!
2,882 2009-01-13 02:52:35
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Yes the empty DriverPacks folder on your HDD was getting found first...
and you were being told there was nothing to extract (because there were no DriverPacks files in that folder)
new base uses the first folder if finds
old base uses the last folder it finds...
Solved! User error...
2,883 2009-01-12 17:56:59
Re: HP Compaq Presario CQ40-310AU goes to XP (15 replies, posted in Hardware)
yeah you missed the target they go into the subfolder named DriverPacks
yes base extracts them if needed...
2,884 2009-01-12 17:32:29
Re: HP Compaq Presario CQ40-310AU goes to XP (15 replies, posted in Hardware)
I am going to guess you extracted them... and you were not supposed to
or you did not put them in the DriverPacks folder in the same location as DriverPacks BASE
2,885 2009-01-12 17:23:16
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
LOL... it IS a tag folder... good point
but that does not cure either issue
2,886 2009-01-12 12:42:29
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
I am so glad that we are now helping each other... that is the spirit of what we are about.
did you run a test after you found the stray OEM folder?
Was the E:\OEM\ folder missing the DriverPacks? ...
(that would definitely cause this issue)
presetup would find the folder on E:\OEM\ before finding the OEM folder on your DVD F:\OEM\
if the E:\OEM\ folder contained no packs then that would generate your "no files to extract" error every time...
That seems like the most reasonable explanation to date...
2,887 2009-01-12 11:22:30
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Card reader issues are more commonly reported than this issue...
I must include the exit for the loop to address the more common issue...
therefore the line needs to be written so it will exit when the source is found...
I want to fix both issues... your feedback is the single most important part of me achieving that goal.
Thank you for taking the time to try different things and reporting your results
this takes time and effort on your part, I recognize and appreciate this effort.
I will consider some more options and report back... (i hope you used the "subscribe to this topic" button below )
Do you have a Folder named OEM on any of your HDDs?...
IE C:\OEM or D:\OEM
2,888 2009-01-12 10:23:47
Re: [REL] [x86, 32 bit] ALL DriverPack's Repacked (246 replies, posted in 3rd Party DriverPacks)
Yeah he said they get copied and renamed so he put them in the 3rd party DriverPack folder...
Can you tell us more specificaly what device was not installed and it's hwid's (SOP)
2,889 2009-01-12 10:18:46
Re: HP Compaq Presario CQ40-310AU goes to XP (15 replies, posted in Hardware)
Um... you are going to have problems
adding DriverPacks HAS to be the last step. If you added drivers then added sp3 you now have garbage... sorry
please read the tutorial (in my signature)
Welcome to DriverPacks and thanks for the kind words!
2,890 2009-01-12 10:04:56
Re: HOWTO Reinstall Windows XP preserving personal data using DP BASE - pa (17 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
I thought about that too... if you were useing his PE method you could just backup the data while your there
PS Helmi i think you missed the boat on this one...
This should not only be stickied IMHO
- it's final version should be moved to the FAQ forum
- this should not be forgotten if/when we add attended installation support.
2,891 2009-01-12 09:02:58
Re: HOWTO Reinstall Windows XP preserving personal data using DP BASE - pa (17 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Only one suggestion...
you incorrectly refer to the WinPE phase of setup as GUI portion.
the three stages are Txt, WinPE, and GUI. GUI mode is the final stage after the second reboot.
WinPE (Windows Preinstallation Environment) is the stage after txt mode reboots... and is when presetup.cmd runs
(BartPE was developed based on this stage of setup)
But i knew what you meant
Make that two ... sorry!
this is a variation of a standard "parallel installation" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316941 (method 4)
(you refer to this as leave filesystem intact - which is descriptive but not accurate technically)
That would be a good thing to point out at the very beginning
people who are savvy will have the general idea already in their head from the beginning
Including the keyword will also make your instructions findable to people who might use the search feature.
Changing the title is probably not necessary but i think saying
How To use DriverPacks when doing a parallel installation (without the mess!)
Would be helpful for finding your info and it's much more descriptive / technically accurate terminology!
Oh... and - WOW! Excellent Job!
Welcome to DriverPacks and we're delighted you posted
I second the opinion of your first post
I have not seen a better one than this!
2,892 2009-01-12 07:52:41
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
It does help...
did you try (as i suggested above) putting the SATA 1 and SATA 2 HDD's on two different controllers?
Since the drives do not match in speed this can cause timing issues... and may reduce performance also.
Unneeded suggestions removed....
WAIT!!! I lost my focus in the confusion above... I said this before too...
(wake up Jeff...)
"un7zip is in the same location as the packs... it can find the program but not the packs... hmmm..."
That line CAN NOT BE the problem... if it was then it would not find UN7ZIP (DUH...)
BRB
One other line was changed (to try to improve speed) change this line
Start /wait /realtime /separate "" "%CDDRIVE%\OEM\bin\un7zip.exe %CDDRIVE%\OEM\DP*.7z %SystemDrive%\
to
%CDDRIVE%\OEM\bin\un7zip.exe %CDDRIVE%\OEM\DP*.7z %SystemDrive%\
That has to be it. It is the only other difference between the two versions...
I could revert this line in the code. I have had no feedback that it actually does speed up the extraction.
PS it may be that it only fails on /realtime. Changing /realtime to /high probably will work too... not sure.
Start /wait /high /separate "" "%CDDRIVE%\OEM\bin\un7zip.exe %CDDRIVE%\OEM\DP*.7z %SystemDrive%\
perhaps un7zip is unable to handle the unbridled power of an AMD x64 in real time
2,893 2009-01-12 07:43:35
Re: Autoupdate for new language files (4 replies, posted in Translations Team)
being as the translators can not put files on the server that means i must do still update the files manually...
(like any of our other packs)
Plus it would require new pages on the site and code in base itself.
Since this is true is it much easier for me to just add them and release a newer version of base
and i only have to update two lines (version number) on the existing web page
So it would be a lot of work to do this way and it is almost no work at all to do it as we are now...
However a link to the bug tracker might be cool...
that way a user could get the update themselves, if one exists..
It is quite easy for me to release a new version of base... and i will do a dlanguage only update... like i did with 8.12.2
Keep up the brainstorming... I love it!
Thanks again for everything you do!
2,894 2009-01-11 19:56:05
Re: Mult-Boot CD (17 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
i have not tried fly a kites version... IDK
it seemed like it was also an i386 folder to target from your descriptiion.
I would have to build one to be of more help... if i have a chance i will...
but someone may just show up with the answer first
2,895 2009-01-11 16:02:20
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
His issue has solely to do with his machine not parsing that single multi-statement line correctly
I am guessing it read SET CDDRIVE=%%i:& GOTO DPsFound
and then set CDDRIVE to something like "D:& GOTO DPsFound" instead of setting it to "D:"
By enclosing the two statements in brackets and putting a CRLF instead of using an & sign as a separator I will get the same result, it just takes up an extra line and a few extra bytes in the file for no good reason whatsoever.
alternately i might have tried SET CDDRIVE=%%i:&& GOTO DPsFound
for some reason the line is not being parsed correctly on his platform...
could be the AMD processor, RAM or the ODD (resetting BIOS defaults is a valid suggestion lewxam)
I have seen even stranger things than this caused by a video card with RAM issues.
I don't think it is the HDD BUT...
He did say it works if he uses an IDE drive... That is the best clue we have
I apply scientific parsimony here
If there are a number of explanations for observed phenomena, the simplest explanation is preferred.
Something with the HDD... perhaps a caching issue
if this were an Intel box i would suggest flashing the BIOS (which can update the microcode on the CPU too)
There just is not enough info provided to draw any kind of a valid conclusion,
and i don't expect anything to be voluteered,
It's like pulling teeth to get simple direct questions answered.
the questions he did answer, like the error message, he was not even able to copy into his post correctly.
So we may never know why his PC Fails to process a line that millions of other computers have no issue with...
my guess is he built it himself.
2,896 2009-01-11 14:02:37
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
there was some issues with card readers and there needed to be an exit to the loop.
When a empty card reader is encountered the script will hang...
the change prevents this from happening as long as the ODD is found before the card reader.
besides it makes sense to stop searching when you have found what your looking for
(or, why is it that things are always in the last place you look, well who keeps looking after thay have found what the were searching for )
here is the thread that prompted that change
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=2923
try this please (we are getting close now)
FOR %%i IN (C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y) DO IF EXIST "%%i:%TAGFILE%" (SET CDDRIVE=%%i:
GOTO DPsFound)
:DPsFound
That should do it...
But... I just don't see why this one machine alone would fail on this line when it works fine for all others...
It doesn't really matter i guess
if this fixes it let me know and i will update the code in the next release.
Like I said... "I will also add code to save someone else from your issue, if it is possible."
and it would seem that it is possible...
But I am totally at a loss to understand why this particular machine is the only one affected... hmmm
2,897 2009-01-11 11:44:11
Re: [Solved] DP Base 8.05 works / 8.12.x "no files to extract" error (47 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
it did not report
"\OEM\" folder not found. all drive letters were searched
hmmm
try...
FOR %%i IN (C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y) DO IF EXIST "%%i:%TAGFILE%" SET CDDRIVE=%%i:& GOTO DPsFound
start /wait Echo "\OEM\" folder not found. all drive letters were searched.
:DPsFound
start /wait dir %CDDRIVE%\OEM\.
and tell me if it lists the contents of the OEM folder on the Disc
Please verify that the ODD is correctly jumpered and cabled...
if it is alone on the IDE channel it should be jumpered as master
and at the end of the cable (not in the middle)
if it is jumpered as 'cable select' move it to the 'master' position.
or try a new cable and then a different ODD ...
try overwiting the un7zip.exe that was installed with the 8.12 with the un7zip.exe that came with base 8.05
(they are not the same) What language are you installing? I assume english but assuming is not good
2,898 2009-01-11 11:31:49
Re: Mult-Boot CD (17 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
you should also slipstream the third folder set... prar
dont do it manualy
2,899 2009-01-11 03:00:56
Re: Announcements for Translations Team (subscribe to this topic!) (30 replies, posted in Translations Team)
Better late than never! thanks a million!
2,900 2009-01-10 20:02:27
Re: P5B - Jmicron still not recognized. (11 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
inappropriate answers or suggestions and sometimes off topic posts, are removed by our resident gremlins
His suggestion was well intentioned but it was misleading because it was incomplete
he suggested a workaround that would need to be repeated and must be done in a certain order
He did not offer those instructions or point out the down side
(fixing it for one user and only for one source)
the rest of us wish to resolve the problem permanently and for everyone.