Moved to Feature requests...
2,527 2009-03-20 21:59:03
Re: [SOLVED] Where do you host the DriverPacks? (5 replies, posted in Site & Forum Issues And Feedback)
I am not aware of any coupon or known discount...
It certainly would not hurt either one of us to mention we that refered you to them!
Perhaps you could be the first of many to recive a coupon or discount
- It never hurts to ask!
Best of luck to you.
2,528 2009-03-20 21:50:28
Re: [REQ] 64bit support - No... Not for NT5 based platforms (101 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
Observance:
Making a good point is considered acceptable, and encouraged
however delivering attitude (especialy on your first day) is discouraged
Observance - Woo Hoo! thanks for weighing in. Nice to see ya...
2,529 2009-03-20 08:58:46
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Doh... One should not code when one is tired
2,530 2009-03-19 17:06:07
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
try it
i think "." has been an allowed Abbr. for "*.*" since at least Win 2k...
2,531 2009-03-19 16:42:25
Re: Annoying beeps when dpsfnsher does it's work (11 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
KTD is not the way to go for many reasons all of which SAD is the answer for.
Lets use your scenario for an example network card replacement
The tech is at the PC (self installing cards are still years away )
two possabilities exist have ODD or not.
if ODD is present drop SAD Disc in and run.
if ODD is unavaliable a SAD folder could have been left on the drive at install (KTD).
a SAD M2 Folder weighs in at like 320 MB for the main packs,
Physx and Language packs are 100 MB more if needed.
With a KTD setup the drivers take almost 2 GB...
and the driver will likely not install properly
- this is a result of the way KTD was designed, it has a few flaws.
- These flaws are addressed with SAD
Here is some related INFO it outlines SAD as a full replacement for KTD
Useing an M1 source for SAD gives you all the functionality of the MS DPInst.exe and the DriverPacks Finisher at the click of a button
Leaving the SAD M1 folder on the machine when it is loaded will provide BETTER than KTD results.
http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 710#p29710
hint
Install M1 with base
(make sure you turn on QSC so you only have to cab them once )
edit the Finisher INI (DPsFnshr.ini) and add this line
DPsRootDel = "false"
this is very important because the finisher will then not delete the folders - (and we have KTD)
2,532 2009-03-19 16:33:09
Re: Question about making xp sp3 compatible with most sata drives (3 replies, posted in DriverPack Mass Storage)
if you follow the guide in my signature all will be revealed
2,533 2009-03-19 16:14:18
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
the simplest solution is to execute the single move that windows normaly would.
move %SYSTEMDRIVE%\$win_nt$.~ls\$OEM$\$1 to %SYSTEMDRIVE% and call it a day
a "move" should happen quickly enough it's not a "copy"
Then DriverPacks should continue normaly without further issues...
this would be accomplished by adding one line near the top of presetup
REM +==========================================================================+
If exist "%systemroot%\system32\setupold.exe" DEL /F "%systemroot%\system32\setupold.exe"
start /wait move /y "%SYSTEMDRIVE%\$win_nt$.~ls\$OEM$\$1\." to "%SYSTEMDRIVE%\"
REM +==========================================================================+
2,534 2009-03-19 15:58:26
Re: [SOLVED] Where do you host the DriverPacks? (5 replies, posted in Site & Forum Issues And Feedback)
The DriverPacks are hosted by Simple CDN.
They handle all the mirroring and load balancing automaticaly
They provide 100% availability for both speed and uptime.
I don't think we could have a better solution than the one provided by Simple CDN.
Download requests for the packs average around one million a week.
We have not had a single download related issue since Wim dropped the old host.
Please look no further than Simple CDN if you want a "Content Delivery Network"
Jeff
2,535 2009-03-19 15:27:27
Re: [REQ] Move SlipStream Button (5 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
It might not be a bad idea
to force people to the overview page to get to the Slipstream button (or even the credits page )
But I tend to think of things in terms of "What is the least number of "clicks" neccessary".
We could then make the argument that reviewing the summary page should be a requirement.
If you then wanted to change one thing you could go there from the tree and back. That would really only add one additional click so... I don't see it as a show stopper if implemented.
I'll keep an open mind on this, and we'll see what people think
2,536 2009-03-19 14:39:29
Re: [REQ] 64bit support - No... Not for NT5 based platforms (101 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
And it would seem young grasshopper was unable to snatch the pebble.
Did someone say troll...?
2,537 2009-03-19 00:46:43
Re: [REQ] Move SlipStream Button (5 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
what if i am useing teh same config everytime? like i do. i just open base and hit the button
Or for people who only want to change one thing, then hit the button. They can go straight two the page they want, change the one thing and hit slipstream... ?
2,538 2009-03-19 00:36:57
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
No...
if the unattended section is missing then the oem folder is not copied from %SYSTEMDRIVE%\$win_nt$.~ls\$OEM$\$1 to %SYSTEMDRIVE% (because this only happens for an unattended / OEM install) otherwise it is. and driverpacks will work as intended - AutoImage works. you need to copy it from $win_nt$.~ls because you altered teh winnt.sif so it is no longer an unattended install and must therefore manually force it to work, IE use the $win_nt$.~ls source instead of useing the final destination of $OEM$\$1 which is %SYSTEMDRIVE% in a normal unattended install.
so \$OEM$\$1\OEM will be moved to %SystemDrive%\OEM and work normaly if you are doing an OEM / unattended install
If you enable the repair feature you disable the $OEM$ folders one or the other - unless someone uses adapts your method.
2,539 2009-03-18 14:24:16
Re: Annoying beeps when dpsfnsher does it's work (11 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
you did not tell us what you did... so i will assume you used KTD
KTD is not neccessary. dont use it, if you must use it then tell us why and we will see what can be done.
2,540 2009-03-18 14:19:24
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Just so users know this is to be used if you want to enable the repair feature.
a normal RIS install works just fine out of the box with roguespears autoimage.
These files overcome the problems created by removing the Unattended section of the winnt.sif...
2,541 2009-03-17 03:47:13
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
Thanks for keeping us in the loop!
2,542 2009-03-17 03:45:53
Re: Help me please! I can't slipstream driverpack into my xp cd (5 replies, posted in Installation Platforms)
i belive he tried to update directly to his CD... fedit is used by BASE...
2,543 2009-03-15 17:20:29
Re: The .ini file for DriverPack not found is invalid: (3 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
the error is because the packs folder structure and ini are not correct.
the files need to be in a subfolder like [1] or something
IE D\CPU\1\
and the INI updated to reflect a proper folder structure
IE
[DriverPack]
platform = "wnt5_x86-32"
name = "CPU"
rootDir = "D\CPU"
; OPTIONAL
classes = "System"
driverCount =
decompSize =
compSize =
[1]
; REQUIRED
exc_count = 1
; OPTIONAL
exc_1_tagFiles = 0
exc_1_+hwids = 1
exc_1_+hwid1 = "ACPI\AUTHENTICAMD_-_X86_FAMILY_15_MODEL_35"
exc_1_-hwids = 0
exc_1_+infFiles = 0
exc_1_-infFiles = 0
exc_1_commands = 1
exc_1_command1 = "%SystemDrive%\pmtimer.exe"
Since the odds are one in a thousand you will actually need this driver it is not much of a problem.
2,544 2009-03-15 11:22:48
Re: RIS Install and method 2 (32 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
I couldn't help but notice that the modem was not installed either. some modems require sound drivers too.
perhaps you could fix this by including the 3rd party DriverPack for modems... I am assuming that modem is in the pack, if it is not you could easily create a 3rd party DriverPack of your own, given your displayed skill level i think it would be NP for you. If I am right it is the sound chip on the modem that is conflicting somehow.
I am going to suggest if that does not work that you could simply try
calling the DP_Inst_Tool during your process and see how it works out.
you might be surprized.
2,545 2009-03-15 11:10:05
Re: RIS input (11 replies, posted in Feedback and Support - DriverPacks Base)
I agree... RogueSpear is a hero. We will miss him greatly.
I really love the Tab for driverpacks with all the selections on one page.
Code... did somebody say code... hmmm
2,546 2009-03-14 15:57:11
Topic: Can I install DriverPacks with nLite? (7 replies, posted in Frequently Asked Questions)
No.
How to install DriverPacks with nLite?
It does not work well. - Please don't.
Please use nLite and make all of your changes first.
Then run DriverPacks BASE to add your drivers.
NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER integrate drivers with nlite as well as DriverPacks using DriverPacks BASE. Your integration WILL fail!
Hint: You can leave nLite open at the create ISO page while you run DriverPacks BASE.
Thank you for finding this post!
Have a great day!
2,547 2009-03-14 09:02:50
Re: A quick question (2 replies, posted in Software)
You can not successfully add DriverPacks with nLite. This is plastered everywhere on this forum...
Some lunatics have even attempted to argue the point, they of course just learned the same thing the hard way.
If you could add the packs with nLite then we would not need to bother with providing DriverPacks BASE
After you have done all your changes with nLite and only creating the ISO remains.
All your changes are complete - only then - run DriverPacks BASE add the driverpacks and create the ISO.
Make no changes to your files after DriverPacks... If you make changes after DriverPacks you will create problems.
This is outlined in great detail in the tutorial... This also covered in every forum at DriverPacks.net
I admit the tutorial is a little old... but every thing there is still valid.
Some of the newer features have not been documented yet
but you don't need them for what you wish to do.
I would create a copy of the source folder after you are done making your changes.
Then add DriverPacks to the copy of the source.
in this way if you need to make changes you can fall back to the pre DriverPacks source and make a new copy
Make your changes to the copy
add DriverPacks last
create ISO. - DriverPacks can be uninstalled from DriverPacks BASE (select no packs and hit slipstream) but the above method is better still.
Before you Post please take the time to read "Read BEFORE you post" in my signature below.
Please note the format and minimum requirements / info we need.
Please take the time to Search the forum, RTFM, and the FAQ and stickied topics in forums related to your issue.
I have a dollar that says your queston (any driverpacks related question) has already been answered somewhere here at the DriverPacks.net forum.
2,548 2009-03-13 18:55:04
Re: DPInst with DriverPacks on network repository (130 replies, posted in Universal Imaging)
Topics... we don't need no stinkin' topics
Wow i belive you guys have discovered the solution that sysprep was meant to be.
I think i will even try it! While you may not be able to drag me back to SysPrep,
perhaps the "SysPrep Alternative" or Alt-SysPrep method will be acceptable to me.
It sounds like even I will find it is a viable solution
2,549 2009-03-13 14:54:22
Re: why do you use the word "slipstream"? (1 replies, posted in Translations Team)
Slipstream is the update of the original OS's installation files.
if you SlipStream XP SP2 with SP3 then the result of the sliptream is XP SP3.
you now have a windows XP source that was "upgraded" or "slipstreamed" with SP3.
SlipStreaming is a term used to describe the process of replacing files in the windows installation with newer versions of the existing files.
I hope that helps!
Jeff
2,550 2009-03-13 14:17:15
Re: [REQ] 64bit support - No... Not for NT5 based platforms (101 replies, posted in Feature Requests)
XP x64 isn't a "program", and drivers AREN'T scarce at all!
Stop making up gossip stories like that. Server 2003 x64 is widely used and uses the exact same base as XP64 does. At least 99 of 100 hardware vendors fully support it, that's why I started posting here. It's really weird that nobody is prepared to create driver-packs for XP x64 Edition. And yes, I'm tempted to create them myself.
And there is the answer... right now we have one coder (me) and two guys working on the packs for XP (mr_ smartepants and JakeLD). We are at the limit of what we can support for just three people. Heck WLAN has not been updated in a year. And if it were not for those two guys NONE of them would have been done. So your solution to the problem we face is to add more packs... I think that's a brilliant solution I may be wrong, but I get the feeling your reaction to this is going to be that "it's not your problem". Unfortunately that is 99.9% of the problem.
Its easy to sit in the stands and yell at the coach and the team, but are you prepared to get in the game?
To put your money where your mouth is? If you have as much "money" as you have "mouth" we should be able to support XP-64 by the end of the week...
So, Let's see some test packs, Proper DriverPacks. If you were to submit valid Graphics, Chipset & Lan packs then you will have convinced me that we would have someone around to update the packs. If I can be made to belive that some help is available to update the packs, then I can and will code DriverPacks BASE to support XP-64. Obviously if no one updates the packs they are not worth having. - This could become your personal contribution, to make an obligation to the community, that would demonstrate to everyone that your commitment to your stated belief runs deeper than a few careless words -
I will restate we get a million downloads a week and nobody askes about XP-64 and even fewer people are willing to do the work it takes to make it happen. Are you one of the few or one of the fewer. Better yet, are you one in a million, will you maintain the 64 bit packs or are you the troll KickArse thinks you are?
It's up to you now. The ball is in your court.
Jeff
actual stats over 40 weeks in this thread
DriverPacks 40 million hits
DriverPacks 64 25 hits
DriverPacks Views for this topic 7000
Ratio 1.6 million to 1 for hits - or my odds of winning the lottery are better
Ratio over 5700 to 1 for Views on this thread - also a wide gap.
more importantly if not one of those 40 million will help with the 32 bit packs
the odds are less than zero that somone will help for the 64 bit ones.
Again it's really all up to you now... are you game... or lame...