<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - [Bug?] ACPI\PNP0C31 - TPM - potential data loss danger]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=6692</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [Bug?] ACPI\PNP0C31 - TPM - potential data loss danger.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:33:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[Bug?] ACPI\PNP0C31 - TPM - potential data loss danger]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=51335#p51335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Noting that ACPI\PNP0C31 is potentially a PNPid that could cause data-loss if wrong driver installed.</p><p>ATMELTPM.INF is the one most likely to be installed by default (with DP_Chipset_wnt5-x86_1301 or newer - still potential with older packs &amp; OS&#039;s) as it is newest &amp; WHQL&#039;ed.<br />&nbsp; This could conflict with Winbond, STMicro, intel or infineon TPM&#039;s.&nbsp; Complicating things somewhat is the fact that Winbond acquired National Semiconductor&#039;s TPM line quite a while ago.&nbsp; It may share in this potential conundrum and confluence of intellectual properties.<br />&nbsp; Atmel may have acquired some IP there as i see that all ID&#039;s are shared with intel&#039;s TPM driver.<br />Of course, that is as of yet unconfirmed too.</p><p>Note that i&#039;m unable to confirm any of this as of yet.&nbsp; Please reply if you have a TPM with that PNPid.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TechDud)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=51335#p51335</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
