<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - [Bug?] ACPI\PNP0C31 - TPM - potential data loss danger]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6692&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2013-04-17T05:33:33Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=6692</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Bug?] ACPI\PNP0C31 - TPM - potential data loss danger]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=51335#p51335"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Noting that ACPI\PNP0C31 is potentially a PNPid that could cause data-loss if wrong driver installed.</p><p>ATMELTPM.INF is the one most likely to be installed by default (with DP_Chipset_wnt5-x86_1301 or newer - still potential with older packs &amp; OS&#039;s) as it is newest &amp; WHQL&#039;ed.<br />&nbsp; This could conflict with Winbond, STMicro, intel or infineon TPM&#039;s.&nbsp; Complicating things somewhat is the fact that Winbond acquired National Semiconductor&#039;s TPM line quite a while ago.&nbsp; It may share in this potential conundrum and confluence of intellectual properties.<br />&nbsp; Atmel may have acquired some IP there as i see that all ID&#039;s are shared with intel&#039;s TPM driver.<br />Of course, that is as of yet unconfirmed too.</p><p>Note that i&#039;m unable to confirm any of this as of yet.&nbsp; Please reply if you have a TPM with that PNPid.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[TechDud]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=14671</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-17T05:33:33Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=51335#p51335</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
