<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - [Warning!] [Misc] UPEK Fingerprint Scanners]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6249&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2012-11-01T05:21:28Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=6249</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [Warning!] [Misc] UPEK Fingerprint Scanners]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49665#p49665"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Michael Mimoso wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&quot;Researcher: Fix for UPEK Fingerprint Reader Encryption Woes Falls Short&quot;<br /><a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/researcher-fix-upek-fingerprint-reader-encryption-woes-falls-short-101112">http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/resea … ort-101112</a></p></blockquote></div><p>An update to this story here --&gt; <a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/deeply-flawed-apple-owned-fingerprint-reader-software-tough-fix-101112">http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/deepl … fix-101112</a></p><br /><p>I note that Apple acquired AuthenTec, including UPEK.<br /><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/27/us-authentec-acquisition-apple-idUSBRE86Q0KD20120727">http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/ … KD20120727</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[TechDud]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=14671</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-11-01T05:21:28Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49665#p49665</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [Warning!] [Misc] UPEK Fingerprint Scanners]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49203#p49203"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I am not personally familiar with any UPEK product or driver.&nbsp; Is it not Authentec that is supplying the newer drivers?&nbsp; Was &quot;enroll.exe&quot; licensed from another entity?</p><p>They were apparently bitter rivals not long ago.&nbsp; <a href="http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2010-02-01/business/os-authentec-rejects-merger-bid-20100201_1_authentec-upek-patent-infringement">http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/201 … fringement</a></p><p>If only Melbourne-based Authentec could do for (formerly?) California-based UPEK&#039;s drivers what Qualcomm seems to have done for Atheros &amp; their (formerly) poor network drivers (incl. WiFi).&nbsp; Now it seems somewhat desirable to have Atheros networking hardware!</p><p>Now that this has become public, one could anticipate some change.&nbsp; Whether that is good or bad, someday perhaps you will tell me.</p><p><em><span class="bbu">Edit</span>:&nbsp; Until then; &quot;Mythbusters&quot; myth-busting conclusion plausibly busted!</em></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[TechDud]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=14671</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-09-11T06:49:26Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49203#p49203</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [Warning!] [Misc] UPEK Fingerprint Scanners]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49194#p49194"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The latest 1.6.1 drivers suck too, the 1.6.0 were better IMO because they included enroll.exe</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ricktendo64]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=71</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-09-11T04:58:36Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49194#p49194</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Warning!] [Misc] UPEK Fingerprint Scanners]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49190#p49190"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: red"><strong><em><span class="bbu">Warning !</span></em></strong></span></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>The Register wrote:</cite><blockquote><p><strong>&quot;UPEK fingerprint scanners insecure, says Elcomsoft</strong><br /><em>Dell, Acer, ASUS, Lenovo, Samsung, Sony and Toshiba may use holey biometric kit</em></p><p><em><span class="bbu">By Richard Chirgwin</span></em></p><p>&quot;Spines in laptop vendor-land are shivering right now with the news that fingerprint scanners from UPEK take users’ Windows passwords and dumps them in near-plain-text in the registry.</p><p>The security howler was turned up in the UPEK Protector Suite, which until recently shipped with laptops using the company’s scanners. While the software was replaced following the merger of UPEK and Authentec, Elcomsoft’s post notes that most users will not have installed the new software.</p><p>“UPEK’s implementation is nothing but a big, glowing security hole compromising (and effectively destroying) the entire security model of Windows accounts,” wrote Elcomsoft’s Olga Koksharova&quot;<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/06/dumb_security_in_biometrics/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/06 … iometrics/</a></p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[TechDud]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=14671</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-09-11T02:07:22Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=49190#p49190</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
