<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - Slipstream Method]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=61&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2006-05-31T07:20:00Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=61</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Slipstream Method]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=356#p356"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Method 2 is more compact and faster.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Siginet]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=18</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-05-31T07:20:00Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=356#p356</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Slipstream Method]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=355#p355"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I 2nd that motion</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[twig123]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=19</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-05-31T06:42:00Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=355#p355</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Slipstream Method]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=349#p349"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Method 2 is superior IMHO.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Wim Leers]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-05-31T05:11:34Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=349#p349</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Slipstream Method]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=347#p347"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ok so if room was not an issue and speed was go with method 1?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[almulder]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=96</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-05-31T02:55:39Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=347#p347</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Slipstream Method]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=346#p346"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Method 1: uses CAB compressed files, which result in larger files to still allow windows to natively be able to unpack the archives.</p><p>Method 2: uses 7zip files which are extracted before the windows install starts, and have a higher compression, cesulting in smaller files.</p><p>...Method 2 is most used for UWXPCD&#039;s, because of the smaller driver sizes there is more room on a CD/DVD for other updates/programs or whatever.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[twig123]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=19</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-05-31T02:53:52Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=346#p346</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Slipstream Method]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=343#p343"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between the 2 methods? I read the short description listed but not sure what ther difference is. Whic method installs faster during windows install?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[almulder]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=96</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-05-31T02:41:56Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=343#p343</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
