<![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - Cosmetic bug in DriverPacks BASE 6.05 CP]]> 2006-05-27T10:25:13Z PunBB http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=6 <![CDATA[Re: Cosmetic bug in DriverPacks BASE 6.05 CP]]> hanschke wrote:

damn to slow sad

[edit]

look at the overview too and i can say it is overall wink

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/3223/15ng2.th.jpg

That is that known bug wink

]]> http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2 2006-05-27T10:25:13Z http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=43#p43 <![CDATA[Re: Cosmetic bug in DriverPacks BASE 6.05 CP]]> damn to slow sad

[edit]

look at the overview too and i can say it is overall wink

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/3223/15ng2.th.jpg

]]> http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=29 2006-05-27T10:11:13Z http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=40#p40 <![CDATA[Re: Cosmetic bug in DriverPacks BASE 6.05 CP]]> Hehe... It's online for less than an hour and already a bug found tongue

I'm glad it's such a tiny one!

]]> http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2 2006-05-26T23:30:34Z http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=8#p8 <![CDATA[Cosmetic bug in DriverPacks BASE 6.05 CP]]> just a but on the about page i saw while looking through.....

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/8415/cosmetic0su.th.jpg

]]> http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=8 2006-05-26T23:29:18Z http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=6#p6