mr_smartepants wrote:

It's right here Stu.
<team link removed>

PS: I said "Bad request. The link you followed is incorrect or outdated."

Link is fine.  It goes to the protected "Team" forums.  You cannot view the link because you are not a team member.

PS: I said "Bad request. The link you followed is incorrect or outdated."

Not to complain but it would be nice to have a naming convention for the Beta users that has the full date in it i.e.

It's right here Stu.
<team link removed>

DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_101007

Which of these is the latest ??

Not to complain but it would be nice to have a naming convention for the Beta users that has the full date in it i.e.

We know if its named wnt5 that means its x86-32.
How about:

DP_MassStorage_wnt5_10310b1 or rc1 etc.

We then know the file is Oct 31 2010  --  103110

Just a thought.

Stu

This was not their fault though. mr_smartepants had uploaded the file and waited many hours before announcing it, giving the file time to propagate. But unfortunately, my cron script that calls rsync to sync the files from our server to the CDN, was not being called by cron (which is my fault).

The file should be available any moment now.

Strange.  I've confirmed that the file exists on the CDN by FTP, but I also get a 404 error.
I sent a message to Wim.  Hopefully he can fix it.

OK, if you can access this file, could you, please, upload it to any file hosting (rapidshare/mediafire/etc), until the problem is fixed?