<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - New Feature to DriversBase - Disable SCSI\SAS drivers.]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4695&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-07-15T02:13:23Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4695</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Feature to DriversBase - Disable SCSI\SAS drivers.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39395#p39395"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>OverFlow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I understand what you are saying... but the one time i need the driver that i did not include... it will cost me way more than the one minute I would potentially save PLUS it would take time to omit them. The script to remove them is in the forum you linked to... it&#039;s a RVMI add on.</p><p>The biggest reason not to do it is man power... We don&#039;t have enough man hours to properly maintain the existing packs. Adding more work, in the form of a new pack, is just more work we don&#039;t have time for. On the other hand if you were willing to take on this task yourself I might be persuaded to consider it</p><p><a href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4631">http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4631</a><br />there is the discussion about the VirtualBox driver...</p></blockquote></div><p>I already done a custom\lite driverpack without SAS\SCSI drivers. I just don&#039;t know if will work to all people and if I miss some SAS and SCSI drivers.</p><p>And due of Intel ICH8M error in v10.06 I used version 9.0.11 to do it.</p><p>Download link:<br /><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/407018298/DP_MassStorage_wnt5_x86-32_9011lite.7z.html">http://rapidshare.com/files/407018298/D … te.7z.html</a></p><p>Other question:<br />Where I can download Night Builds or test version?</p><p>Thank you for reply</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Sydnelson]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=3210</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-15T02:13:23Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39395#p39395</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Feature to DriversBase - Disable SCSI\SAS drivers.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39394#p39394"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you are saying... but the one time i need the driver that i did not include... it will cost me way more than the one minute I would potentially save PLUS it would take time to omit them. The script to remove them is in the forum you linked to... it&#039;s a RVMI add on.</p><p>The biggest reason not to do it is man power... We don&#039;t have enough man hours to properly maintain the existing packs. Adding more work, in the form of a new pack, is just more work we don&#039;t have time for. On the other hand if you were willing to take on this task yourself I might be persuaded to consider it</p><p><a href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4631">http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=4631</a><br />there is the discussion about the VirtualBox driver...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-15T00:18:38Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39394#p39394</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Feature to DriversBase - Disable SCSI\SAS drivers.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39389#p39389"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>OverFlow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Well Mass storage is only about 5 meg total... Even if we could cut that in half (not likely) it would only save about 2 meg of file copy... </p><p>There is almost no benefit for the effort. </p><p>I vote no... not worth the effort.</p><p>Since the philosophy of the DriverPacks is to include ALL drivers it is also against our projects main goal... <br />So really, really <strong>no</strong>, it&#039;s not going to happen.</p><br /><p>PS feature requests should go in the feature requests forum... Moved.</p></blockquote></div><p>I think not only in space but in time to load drivers in textmode. By now I open DriverPack MassStorage ini and remove all SAS, SCSI entries. Then I use DriverBase to slipstream into XP source. After this removal I gain 3 minutes in slow machines and 1 minute in fast ones. To me that work with dozens of machines per week this minutes will speedup alot my work everyday.</p><p>And if DriverPack don&#039;t like this ideal can anyone simple update the script to remove that driver with RyanVM or NLITE? To me will be very usefull.</p><br /><p>By the way I have problems with new MassStorage 10.0.6. Everytime I slipstream it on my XP source I get BSOD in hardware detection when I use SATA Controller on Virtual Box 3.2.6. This problem doesnt occours if I use older 9.0.11 version... Any solution to this issue?</p><p>Thanks for help</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Sydnelson]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=3210</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-14T09:44:22Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39389#p39389</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Feature to DriversBase - Disable SCSI\SAS drivers.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39387#p39387"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well Mass storage is only about 5 meg total... Even if we could cut that in half (not likely) it would only save about 2 meg of file copy... </p><p>There is almost no benefit for the effort. </p><p>I vote no... not worth the effort.</p><p>Since the philosophy of the DriverPacks is to include ALL drivers it is also against our projects main goal... <br />So really, really <strong>no</strong>, it&#039;s not going to happen.</p><br /><p>PS feature requests should go in the feature requests forum... Moved.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-14T07:41:27Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39387#p39387</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New Feature to DriversBase - Disable SCSI\SAS drivers.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39377#p39377"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I want to request sugest a option to DriversBase.</p><p>I always use it to slipstream MassStorage TextMode drivers to my XP source, But me and I think 90% of users no need SCSI, SAS and TapeDrive drivers than is not better add a option to inject only IDE, SATA and RAID drivers to XP source instead all this useless files? Or maybe create a Lite version of this DriverPack. This will speedup TextMode setup several times.</p><br /><p>To do this speedup I have used in last 2 years this following script:<br /><a href="http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5800">http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5800</a><br />but it is very outdated...</p><p>Sorry my poor english....</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Sydnelson]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=3210</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-13T15:18:54Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=39377#p39377</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
