DriverPacks.net Forum - [SOLVED] aesthetical placement of GUIRunOnce entry for the Finisher

Re: [SOLVED] aesthetical placement of GUIRunOnce entry for the Finisher

null@example.com (Sm0k3r) — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:51:22 +0000

Too fast Bash. Thanks.

Re: [SOLVED] aesthetical placement of GUIRunOnce entry for the Finisher

null@example.com (Wim Leers) — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:48:44 +0000

Done!

Fast heh!

Re: [SOLVED] aesthetical placement of GUIRunOnce entry for the Finisher

null@example.com (Sm0k3r) — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:44:28 +0000

Ok. will you get the command lined up so that its aesthetically pleasing to read

Re: [SOLVED] aesthetical placement of GUIRunOnce entry for the Finisher

null@example.com (Wim Leers) — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:36:20 +0000

Won't mattter. I'll change it though, just for the looks.

[SOLVED] aesthetical placement of GUIRunOnce entry for the Finisher

null@example.com (Sm0k3r) — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:32:09 +0000

Not sure if this is a bug or not but I have noticed that the finish command is now placed below the other commands that I have under [GUIRUNONCE] in winnt.sif where before the new BASE packs it was placed first under [GUIRUNONCE]

e.g.
pre 6.08

[GuiRunOnce]
    command9="%SystemDrive%\fnsh_log.cmd"
    command10="%systemdrive%\music.cmd"
    command11="%systemdrive%\RunOnceEx.cmd"

6.08.2

[GuiRunOnce]
    command10="%systemdrive%\music.cmd"
    command11="%systemdrive%\RunOnceEx.cmd"
command9="%SystemDrive%\DPsFnshr.exe"

What I would like to know does it make any difference in what order the commands are run.

Thanks
Graham