<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - [WARNING] 91.31 ForceWare on nF 570 SLI (9.16) or Intel 955X => CRASH]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=383&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2006-08-07T15:02:02Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=383</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [WARNING] 91.31 ForceWare on nF 570 SLI (9.16) or Intel 955X => CRASH]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=2278#p2278"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>lieblingsbesuch wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>that&#039;s bad <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/hmm.png" width="15" height="15" alt="hmm" />.</p><p>will this be the first time ever bashrat will include a beta (91.33) in dp graphics a 6.08.1 ? <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p></blockquote></div><p>That would be the second time, actually... And the first time did <strong>not</strong> do well... I&#039;ll await an official nVidia update: they cannot stay in this kind of situation for a long time. I suspect (read: <em>hope</em>) they&#039;ll offer a new version soon.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Wim Leers]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-08-07T15:02:02Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=2278#p2278</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [WARNING] 91.31 ForceWare on nF 570 SLI (9.16) or Intel 955X => CRASH]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=2277#p2277"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>that&#039;s bad <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/hmm.png" width="15" height="15" alt="hmm" />.</p><p>will this be the first time ever bashrat will include a beta (91.33) in dp graphics a 6.08.1 ? <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[lieblingsbesuch]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=24</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-08-07T14:56:40Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=2277#p2277</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[[WARNING] 91.31 ForceWare on nF 570 SLI (9.16) or Intel 955X => CRASH]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=2222#p2222"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>Latest ForceWare drivers cause system crashes <br /> by Cyril Kowaliski - 12:48 am, July 12, 2006</p><p>NVIDIA&#039;s latest official ForceWare graphics drivers cause serious system crashes when combined with motherboards based on the new nForce 570 SLI chipset, according to a report at HardOCP. The &#039;OCP tested two nForce 570 SLI mobos in systems outfitted with the latest nForce 570 SLI/570/550 9.16 platform drivers and ForceWare 91.31 graphics drivers, and in both cases the machines apparently suffered from not only crashes, but also data corruption. According to a Taiwanese source quoted by the site, problems with the new ForceWare drivers also occur in systems with Intel 955X chipsets.<br />Neither HardOCP nor its Taiwanese source give specifics on the frequency of these problems, but both suggest NVIDIA&#039;s ForceWare 91.33 beta driversâ€”available from the nZone websiteâ€”fix the problem.</p><p>Amusingly, this report comes on the same day as NVIDIA&#039;s boastful press release about achieving &quot;excellent&quot; stability results in a Veritest study. NVIDIA says Veritest found that PCs built around the NVIDIA Business Platform passed a high-stress 15-day burn-in test, while one of the competing Intel-based systems failed the same test after 24 hours. Veritest concluded that NVIDIA Business Platform systems were &quot;as stable, if not more stable&quot; than the competition.</p></blockquote></div><p><a href="http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/10335">source</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Wim Leers]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-08-06T17:26:48Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=2222#p2222</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
