DriverPacks.net Forum - [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (BigBrit) — Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:55:11 +0000

Just a cosmetic issue. Could you make the Finisher box a little wider as B14 reads B1, cutting off the last digit.

Looking forward to the new versions with 7z 9.2.

Stu

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (mr_smartepants) — Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:49:40 +0000

How about something simple like DP_3_*.7z

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (OverFlow) — Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:17:26 +0000

Bump... Erik? Guys?

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (OverFlow) — Thu, 14 May 2009 04:45:41 +0000

I am going to move this to feature requests

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (Sm0k3r) — Wed, 13 May 2009 10:54:44 +0000

OverFlow wrote:

and the voting begins...
Ideas?
the DP_ part is and the platform id is currently hard coded...
so other anything other than that it would be easy
DP_3P-PackName_x86-32_Version.7z is a good idea

Good idea OverFlow, does make sense to be able to distinguish between main DriverPacks and 3rd Party Packs especially like myself you keep practically all DriverPacks in 1 folder.

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (OverFlow) — Wed, 13 May 2009 07:15:14 +0000

and the voting begins...

Ideas?

the DP_ part is and the platform id is currently hard coded...
so other anything other than that it would be easy

DP_3P-PackName_x86-32_Version.7z is a good idea

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (newsposter) — Tue, 12 May 2009 20:40:45 +0000

Well, the names of the 10 core packs are stable so anything that isn't a core pack is by definition a 3pp.

Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (mr_smartepants) — Tue, 12 May 2009 19:02:09 +0000

That's actually not a bad idea. I don't know however the best way to implement it.

[FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names

null@example.com (irQ) — Tue, 12 May 2009 18:39:10 +0000

Should there not be a way to see the difference from 3rd party packs and Base packs. They both use the same naming convention.

Base > DP_Chipset_wint5_x86-32_902.7z

3rd Party > DP_USB_wint5_x86-32_101.7z

If your a noob like myself, just looking at the files names.......can't tell.

How about putting a 3 in there somewhere to show it's 3rd party pack ......> DP3_USB_wint5_x86-32_101.7z or DP_3P_USB_x86-32_101.7z

just saying....