<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3744&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-11-22T00:55:11Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=3744</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=41502#p41502"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Just a cosmetic issue. Could you make the Finisher box a little wider as B14 reads B1, cutting off the last digit.</p><p>Looking forward to the new versions with 7z 9.2.</p><p>Stu</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[BigBrit]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-11-22T00:55:11Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=41502#p41502</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=41485#p41485"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>How about something simple like DP_3_*.7z</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mr_smartepants]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1602</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-11-20T08:49:40Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=41485#p41485</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=41479#p41479"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Bump... Erik? Guys?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-11-20T08:17:26Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=41479#p41479</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31330#p31330"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I am going to move this to feature requests</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-14T04:45:41Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31330#p31330</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31300#p31300"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>OverFlow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>and the voting begins...</p><p>Ideas?</p><p>the DP_ part is and the platform id is currently hard coded... <br />so other anything other than that it would be easy <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>DP_3P-PackName_x86-32_Version.7z&nbsp; is a good idea</p></blockquote></div><p>Good idea OverFlow, does make sense to be able to distinguish between main DriverPacks and 3rd Party Packs especially like myself you keep practically all DriverPacks in 1 folder.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Sm0k3r]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=72</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-13T10:54:44Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31300#p31300</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31293#p31293"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>and the voting begins...</p><p>Ideas?</p><p>the DP_ part is and the platform id is currently hard coded... <br />so other anything other than that it would be easy <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>DP_3P-PackName_x86-32_Version.7z&nbsp; is a good idea</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-13T07:15:14Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31293#p31293</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31290#p31290"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well, the names of the 10 core packs are stable so anything that isn&#039;t a core pack is by definition a 3pp.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[newsposter]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2993</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-12T20:40:45Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31290#p31290</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31287#p31287"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s actually not a bad idea.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know however the best way to implement it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mr_smartepants]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1602</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-12T19:02:09Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31287#p31287</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[[FeedBack] 3rd party names vs. Base names]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31286#p31286"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Should there not be a way to see the difference from 3rd party packs and Base packs. They both use the same naming convention.</p><p>Base &gt; DP_Chipset_wint5_x86-32_902.7z</p><p>3rd Party &gt; DP_USB_wint5_x86-32_101.7z</p><br /><p>If your a noob like myself, just looking at the files names.......can&#039;t tell.</p><p>How about putting a 3 in there somewhere to show it&#039;s 3rd party pack ......&gt;&nbsp; DP3_USB_wint5_x86-32_101.7z&nbsp; &nbsp; or&nbsp; DP_3P_USB_x86-32_101.7z</p><br /><p>just saying....</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[irQ]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=6819</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-12T18:39:10Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=31286#p31286</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
