<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=3584</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Potential bug with driver signing repression v2.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:49:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29690#p29690</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, KTD is just a waste of space.&nbsp; I never use it.<br />It causes too many problems in my experience.<br />SAD on the other hand is just awesome!&nbsp; Not perfect, but getting there.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mr_smartepants)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29690#p29690</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29684#p29684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I know but I wanted to check to be sure that&#039;s what was causing problems, isn&#039;t SAD the stand alone drivers project? How would that affect KTD?</p><p>In any case I&#039;ve since built another one with it disabled and everything installed fine.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jdub)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29684#p29684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29683#p29683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>LOL... yeah you did <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (OverFlow)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29683#p29683</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29682#p29682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>OverFlow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Don&#039;t enable KTD... it is not needed and has been replaced by SAD</p></blockquote></div><p>Geez, didn&#039;t I just say that? <br /><a href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29661#p29661">http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 661#p29661</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mr_smartepants)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29682#p29682</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29681#p29681</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Don&#039;t enable KTD... it is not needed and has been replaced by SAD</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (OverFlow)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29681#p29681</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29674#p29674</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I just built a new disc from scratch and when I integrated Bâshrat the Sneaky it completed in 2 seconds - which made me go &quot;huh&quot; so I ran it again and it took 12 seconds... which sounded better to me so I burned it and it did that thing again with the driver warning and the little counter (number of times warning box closed 300+) I had ktd enabled</p><p>heres the log: <a href="http://g.imagehost.org/download/0763/DPs_BASE">DPs_BASE.log (7 KB)</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jdub)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 03:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29674#p29674</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29670#p29670</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Edit: figured out the problem, I had both 803 and 902 in my driverpacks folder, dpbase must default to the older version for whatever reason while checking the newer one against the update checker... a little wonky, maybe a bug.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jdub)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29670#p29670</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29669#p29669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Current DriverPack Chipset is 9.02, not 8.03 as in your log.&nbsp; That should fix your USB issue and possibly your IDE problem.<br />Sigmatel is always a bitch.&nbsp; Your best bet for that is to get the driver directly from the Dell support site.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mr_smartepants)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29669#p29669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29666#p29666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Took awhile to finish, started at 4:42 and ended around 5:15, not bad though. There were problems. I left the disable driver signing checking option in nLite on (meaning it DID disable SFC) and this time the warning boxes didnt come up. so go figure.</p><p>Drivers that successfully installed:<br />-videocard ati mobility radeon 9000 (5/3/2006)<br />-Broadcom 570x Gigabit Integrated Controller<br />-Intel Pro 2200BG wireless</p><p>Failed:<br />-Sigmatel audio controller<br />-IDE ATA controller (both the primary/secondary and the intel listing show they&#039;re using the 2001 microsoft driver)</p><p>Shouldn&#039;t sound B and mass storage (or maybe chipset) have taken care of those 2?<br />Also the usb stick (ocz diesel 16gb) that ive been using to xfer stuff like drivers etc detected but didnt install on the laptop, instead a yellow ! came up in device manager next to it and only after going through &quot;update driver&quot; did it install =/</p><p><a href="http://g.imagehost.org/0710/HWIDs.txt">HWIDs.txt</a> - in case anyones wondering. I cant figure out how to link to dells support page but its an inspiron 600m laptop.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jdub)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29666#p29666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29664#p29664</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me.&nbsp; Let us know how it turns out.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mr_smartepants)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29664#p29664</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Potential bug with driver signing repression v2]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29663#p29663</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thought it best to make a new post to avoid confusion, ignore the last one or if you&#039;re an admin please delete it.</p><p>I started with an OEM copy of xp pro with sp2 integrated. I dont know how to identify its exact license. It&#039;s volume title is VX2POEM_EN and its 586mb, maybe someone recognizes it. I mounted it in daemon tools and extracted to a new folder</p><p>Fired up nLite and slipstreamed sp3. - recieved a warning that hotfixes were present and they would be deleted, hit ok.</p><p>Then Added ryanVM&#039;s 1.0.3 post sp3 update pack along with the directX9c addon</p><p>No drivers were integrated for the sake of bug detection - though I&#039;d like to add a few (touch point, modem etc)</p><p>Misc tweaks/settings - Heres the nLite configuration file: <a href="http://g.imagehost.org/download/0767/Last_Session">Last_Session.ini (13 KB)</a> - the installation was reduced by 154mb for a total size of 479mb</p><p>RVM 1.5.4_b09 to integrate OEMSCAN_1.4.1_MR_SMARTEPANTS_ADDON_MULTIOEM_1.8.07.7z - Heres the ini for that <a href="http://g.imagehost.org/download/0283/integrator">integrator.ini (406 B)</a><br />I was tempted to check &quot;optimize system files&quot; but thought better of it. Heres the log: <a href="http://g.imagehost.org/download/0436/RVM_Integrator_1_5_4_b09">RVM_Integrator_1_5_4_b09.log (3 KB)</a></p><p>I deleted DPBase to avoid confusion/problems. <a href="http://g.imagehost.org/download/0658/DPs_BASE">DPs_BASE.ini (2 KB)</a> and <a href="http://f.imagehost.org/download/0439/DPs_BASE">DPs_BASE.log (7 KB)</a><br />Using DriverPacks Base 8.12.4 I integrated the following packs:<br />Chipset, Graphics C, LAN, Masstorage, Sound B, and Wlan - all the latest versions</p><p>Created the image with nLite (left the create iso page open the whole time) and burned with nero with verification on. It burned fine. Beginning install now.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jdub)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=29663#p29663</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
