If you are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem.

Or just part of the scenery
I think my first post here was something like "Why haven't you updated the DriverPack Graphics A?"
I got slammed that time too.

I use the MassStorage v9.01.R3 because it has the VirtualBox Bug Fix.
And MassStorage v8.05 i can't use because on same new PC's & Laptop's i get a Blue Screen because the drivers are to old
I use only the MassStorage & LAN & WLAN Driver Packs the other drivers i can than be download directly from the Internet.
I would love to see more final version of this 3 Driver Packs in my option this 3 are the most important Packs.

But don't get me wrong i now that making this Packs is time intensive work i only suggesting it would be a good idee to make this 3 Packs the TOP priority Packs

Outbreaker the response below is not aimed directly at you.
- You are a good friend of DriverPacks.
- You have stated clearly that you DO appreciate the amount of work involved!
It is aimed at the masses, because we get this type of question a lot!
Thank you for your personal contributions to DriverPacks, and your assistance to the team!

They are the top priority...

Sorry for this rant outbreaker.

Everybody wants to bitch that the packs don't get updated but NO ONE volunteers to update them.
You guys need to thank God that mr_smartepants and JakeLD update them at all.
Seldom are people nice or appreciative and everyone wants to tell us how they think it should be done.
It is REALLY ANNOYING when we get a post 5 minutes after a major driver (like nvidia) is updated.
We already know... It is what we do.  furthermore this type of a post implies, 
"Why the heck have you slackers not gotten this in a pack yet! You had better get to work on it now!" .
The most annoying part is nobody wants to step up and help do the work.
(I am always tempted to ask "Well why haven't YOU added it yet!")
Just once i would like to see a post like:
I added this driver to DriverPack name in my local copy and it works, this is what I did...
(actually, I have seen that once or twice )
If we had a few posts like that or a few more people willing to do some work it would not take months to do.
you would think that with a million downloads a month that we could find more than two people who are willing to help adding drivers... If we had as many people adding drivers as we had asking why they are not updated we could release all the packs weekly.

If you are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem.

To conclude: (regarding how long it takes to release).
- If you have not volunteered to be on the team then sit down and shut up.

PS Outbreaker you have been added to the testing team too, for showing some respect.
thank you!
jeff

9.01 was updated on the server. My bad. Sorry! grab it again please, and good eye...

Will retry this weekend and provide feedback.

Donors can only reply to existing posts in the testing team forum, they can not create new topics.

Welcome to the testing team.... problem solved

congrats

You are using Nightly packs... this is normal and expected.

Overflow, the masstorage is 9.01 and this is not a nightly, right?
I got this from the front dp website, not from the nightlies site.

2009-01-08 23:23:29 : <INIT> Detected DriverPack Chipset 812n1!
2009-01-08 23:23:29 : <INIT> Detected DriverPack Graphics A 8121!
2009-01-08 23:23:29 : <INIT> Detected DriverPack LAN 8121!
2009-01-08 23:23:29 : <INIT> Detected DriverPack MassStorage 901!
2009-01-08 23:23:29 : <INIT> Detected DriverPack Sound B 901n1!
2009-01-08 23:23:29 : <INIT> Detected DriverPack WLAN 806!

Chipset & Sound B are nightlies indeed.

Something else, how come I can't start a new topic in "Testing Team"?

And the DP's worked fine expect for a LAN card, I reported that in mentioned thread.

r.

But don't get me wrong i now that making this Packs is time intensive work i only suggesting it would be a good idee to make this 3 Packs the TOP priority Packs

There will be some stray files when using any nightlies.
Test packs are not for production machines...
Since they are for testing only it does not matter.
In Fact it should be a reminder to you to double check everything worked...

@outbreaker
this is NOT a bug... IT IS BY DESIGN.
It tells us when non testing team members have been using the nightlies for purposes other than testing.
(Donors like dnoiz are automatically on the testing team)
In other words your report has told me you are using files you have not been authorized to access.
and you don't have access to the thread that discusses the details about the test pack(s).
(when you are sneaking cookies out of the jar don't complain about the flavor )
IE you can't use the word BUG related to test files if your not on the testing team,
Since you don't have access to the details associated with the nightly packs.

At the same time I do greatly appreciate you taking the time to report your results!
although you did not mention whether or not it worked

Do Not Use nightlies for anything except testing...

I have some files left behind on the C: drive. Is this normal?

For the integration details see this post : http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic. … 754#p27754

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>dir
 Volume in drive C has no label.
 Volume Serial Number is 184C-14AE

 Directory of C:\

08/01/2009  23:39                 0 AUTOEXEC.BAT
24/12/2008  17:21             1.057 changelog_Chipset.txt
05/01/2009  21:12               649 Changelog_Sound_B.txt
08/01/2009  23:39                 0 CONFIG.SYS
08/01/2009  23:53    <DIR>          Documents and Settings
07/01/2009  23:14             3.895 DriverPack_MassStorage_Changelog.txt
05/01/2009  12:30         3.132.416 hwids_dpsa_dpsb.xls
09/01/2009  00:05    <DIR>          Program Files
09/01/2009  00:06    <DIR>          WINDOWS
               6 File(s)      3.138.017 bytes
               3 Dir(s)   7.170.256.896 bytes free

C:\>