should be read as exclusions (when met) will stop further processing of the section.

At least one +hwid MUST exist / match or the section will not be used
If ANY -hwids exist at all then the entire section will be ignored

review
+ must exist
- cannot exist
then section processed

it is not neccessary, usually, to have more than one of these types of lines

Use the main packs as reference ther are some excellent examples in them... (DriverPack Graphics A)

req granted

Welcome aboard...

shouldn't these 2 lines read as:

exc_1_+hwid2 = "<idem, will not be required if one of the previous '+hwid' requirements is already fulfilled>"

exc_1_+infFile2 = "<idem, will not be required if one of the previous '+infFile' requirements is already fulfilled>"

Not as:

exc_1_+hwid2 = "<idem, will not be required if one of the previous '-hwid' requirements is already fulfilled>"

exc_1_+infFile2 = "<idem, will not be required if one of the previous '-hwid' requirements is already fulfilled>"

While on DPsFnshr exceptions, is there any more information on how exc_1_+infFiles works, as I'd like to use it in the Bluetooth DriverPack, but I'm having problems getting it to use the HWIDs in the INF File.

Also, is there any chance of getting access to the Testing thread

Thanks
7yler