<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3146&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2008-10-15T17:08:37Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=3146</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25140#p25140"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I must disagree, I don&#039;t see the point of including drivers already supported by pciide.sys and intelide.sys which are inclued in 2K,XP and 2K3. Unless the INF fixes some issues and I doubt this since there is no sys file updates. DriverPacks officially support 2K, XP and 2K3 and that&#039;s it for now.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-15T17:08:37Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25140#p25140</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25124#p25124"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>best one i can think of is a driver that is included in the most recent SP only...</p><p>we dont really need it but some poor slob who is tied to an old SP for wahtever reason just might...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-15T05:43:16Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25124#p25124</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25123#p25123"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Both MS and CS are small enough that there would have to be a big benefit of creating &#039;archive&#039; packs to justify the work.</p><p>Besides from having to parse fewer HWIDs (and fewer headaches), what are the potential bennies?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[newsposter]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2993</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-15T05:39:25Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25123#p25123</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25111#p25111"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>mass storage would be tougher as i would have to code base to regonize the archive mass pack <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-15T01:14:11Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25111#p25111</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25108#p25108"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That is a Most Excellent Idea.</p><p>In one form, Graphics C already serves that function.&nbsp; I can see that a similar pack for both Chipset and MassStorage would do the same thing.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[newsposter]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2993</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-14T23:33:50Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25108#p25108</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25104#p25104"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>you might make an archive pack out of them too... 3rd party DriverPack for legacy OS versions (out of date SP wise)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[OverFlow]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-14T20:56:46Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25104#p25104</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25094#p25094"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks 7yler for your interest into the project, feedback is always apprecied. Like Overflow once said, newer is not always better...unless it fixes some bugs. So I will leave it out for now and I will also remove the others ones that are natively supported by 2K SP4, XP SP3 and 2003 SP2.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-14T13:51:38Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25094#p25094</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25090#p25090"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>JakeLD,</p><p>Thanks for your time and researh into this. </p><p>I had no broken install caused by nlite, I just enjoy playing around with windows builds on different hardware. At times I will use DriverAgent.com and other tools to check for Driver updates and noticed this was listed as requiring an update. As DriverPacks includes all the old Intel ICH Drivers I thought I would mention this one.</p><p>If as newsposter reports, it causes issues with newer hardware/software, leave it out. <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><br /><p>Out of interest, I did a test on the old rig:</p><p>Hardware:&nbsp; &nbsp;Pent III, 512Mb, 82801BA (PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_244B)&nbsp; <br />Software:&nbsp; &nbsp;Windows XP SP3</p><br /><p>Default Windows XP SP3 Install<br />--------------------------------------------------</p><p>Intel(R) 82801BA Ultra ATA Storage Controller - 244B</p><p>Driver Provider: Microsoft Corporation<br />Driver Date:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;1/07/2001<br />Driver Version:&nbsp; 5.1.2600.5512</p><p>files: atapi.sys, intelide.sys, pciidex.sys</p><br /><p>After Installing Intel Application Accelerator 2.3 <br />----------------------------------------------------</p><p>Intel(R) 82801BA Ultra ATA Storage Controller - 244B</p><p>Driver Provider: Intel<br />Driver Date:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;1/10/2002<br />Driver Version:&nbsp; 2.3.0.2160</p><p>files: ideBusDr.sys, ideChnDr.sys, IPrtCntst.dll</p><br /><p>While here, I would just like to give a big thumbs up to all you guys, for all your hard work, I know how time consuming and frustrating drivers can be. I wasted many hours until I found DriverPacks. You do a fantastic job.</p><p>Damn ... I just re-read that and it sound like I just found GOD <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> ... Well maybe I did ... The Driver Mecca <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>Cheers<br />7yler</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[7yler]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=4650</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-14T11:51:38Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25090#p25090</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25074#p25074"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>So 7yler,</p><p>I discovered we don&#039;t need to add your driver in the final release of a pack. After couple of research I noticed that your driver is part of 2K SP4, XP SP2 and XP3 as well. If by any chance you deleted drivers with nLite I wonder why? On what OS was running your old rig ? And did you notice any issue when they are missing ?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-14T00:07:32Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25074#p25074</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25073#p25073"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#039;ve done some research and all ide drivers from ICH1 to ICH6 are included in XP. ICH7 to ICH10 are not included.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>IdeChnDr.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2411 txtsetup.sif mshdc.inf<br />IdeChnDr.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2421 txtsetup.sif mshdc.inf<br />IdeChnDr.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_244B txtsetup.sif mshdc.inf<br />IdeChnDr.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24CB mshdc.inf</p><p>ich2ide.inf&nbsp; &nbsp;PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_244B txtsetup.sif mshdc.inf</p><p>ICH2ideM.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_244A txtsetup.sif mshdc.inf</p><p>ich3ide.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_248B mshdc.inf</p><p>ich3idem.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_248A mshdc.inf</p><p>ich4ide.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24CB mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24CA mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24C1 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br />ich4id2.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24CB mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24CA mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24C1 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br />ich5id2.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24D1 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24DB mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_25A2 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_25A3 mshdc.inf</p><p>ich5ide.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24D1 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24DB mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_25A2 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_25A3 mshdc.inf</p><p>ich6id2.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2651 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2652 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2653 mshdc.inf&nbsp; &nbsp; <br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_266F mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br />ich6ide.inf PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2651 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2652 mshdc.inf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2653 mshdc.inf&nbsp; &nbsp; <br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_266F mshdc.inf</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-13T23:36:42Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25073#p25073</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25069#p25069"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes but I will probably take it out.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-13T21:02:25Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25069#p25069</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25067#p25067"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yah, as much as I like Intels commitment to legacy product support, the IAA is a PITA.&nbsp; It was a temporary patch for a quickly fixed Microsoft XP bug-let.&nbsp; It&#039;s also toxic to anything newer than an original Pentium4.</p><p>You get &#039;well meaning&#039; users, bored to tears at their desks, who cruise the &#039;net looking for ways to improve their office PC.&nbsp; More often than not, this means that one of my guys wastes an hour or two re-imaging their machine and then spending a day or more doing data recovery.</p><p>Did this thing get into MassStorage G or not?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[newsposter]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2993</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-13T19:07:23Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25067#p25067</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25066#p25066"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Newsposter seems to be right. Iv&#039;e looked at inf for XP SP3 and</p><p>PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2411<br />PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_2421<br />PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_244B</p><p>are part of txtsetup.sif and mshdc.inf</p><p>PCI\VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24CB is part of mshdc.inf only.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-13T18:53:30Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25066#p25066</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25064#p25064"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#039;t the Intel application accelerator made obsolete by an XP update some 2+ years ago?</p><p>Besides that, it&#039;s useless on newer hardware than an ICH5, all laptops, and **any** CPU that has hyperthreading.&nbsp; It&#039;s also &#039;unfriendly&#039; (in a data loss kind of way) with Norton Speed Disk and third-party read/write cache software.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[newsposter]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2993</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-13T18:22:27Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25064#p25064</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [IMPL] Intel Application Accelerator 2.3]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25059#p25059"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>No problem, i&#039;m on it. Since it&#039;s an IDE driver , it will go in MassStorage pack instead. Thanks for reporting.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JakeLD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-10-13T14:02:02Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=25059#p25059</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
