<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[DriverPacks.net Forum - Are the nVIDIA display drivers modded?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1702&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2007-06-28T17:12:57Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?id=1702</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Are the nVIDIA display drivers modded?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=12106#p12106"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>harriscs wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The first note is that obviously the system, after the XP installation, keeps the Sneaky&#039;s drivers somewhere (where?).</p></blockquote></div><p>Hello and welcome to the DriverPacks!<br />May In introduce you to KTD (Keep The Drivers)? <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>If you did not modify the default path, it should be %systemroot%\DriverPacks</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>The second note is HOW is possible to install such a new driver to such an old video card? I want to add that the latest official driver with support for GeForce2 is 66.93 (10/2004). The official nVIDIA 93.71 drivers CANNOT be installed in a system with a GeForce2. So, I suppose that these Sneaky&#039;s drivers are modded, so that can be installed on almost every display card. Is that a fact?</p></blockquote></div><p>The driver installation routine won&#039;t allow you to install, that is correct.<br />This does not mean, however, the HW is not actually supported by the drivers.<br />As we do not call the original setup.EXE to install the drivers, this &quot;problem&quot; can be circumvented.</p><p>I experienced the same with a GF4MX400, and from what I can tell, it does not have any problems running on these newer drivers (granted, I don&#039;t do much 3D with it but the DXconfig test runs through as well as 3DMark and Google Earth).</p><p>I suppose if you were to manually install these drivers by right-clicking on the INF file, hence not using the setup.EXE, it would also work.</p><p>Give it a try sometime! <img src="http://forum.driverpacks.net/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Helmi]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=25</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-06-28T17:12:57Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=12106#p12106</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Are the nVIDIA display drivers modded?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=12015#p12015"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hmm,<br />That&#039;s odd.&nbsp; We don&#039;t modify the nvidia drivers.&nbsp; We only add another .inf file to support mobility chipsets.&nbsp; If your card was not supported, it would not be listed in the .inf.&nbsp; <br />nvidia was the first (I think) to create a unified driverset back in the &#039;90s to support any current and future cards.&nbsp; Lately, they&#039;ve been splintering their driver releases so that older cards use the older drivers and are not supported by the newer driversets.&nbsp; This is a pain for us.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mr_smartepants]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=1602</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-06-27T06:06:12Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=12015#p12015</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Are the nVIDIA display drivers modded?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=12005#p12005"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello. These driver packs are amazing! Recently, I noticed something that has surprised me. I have an unattended XP setup with all driver packs included (method 2). I replaced my card with an old GeForce2 MX-200 card and I saw that the system automatically installed the appropriate display driver: But not the well known driver from XP SP2 (version 5x.xx date 2004), but the latest official driver 93.71 (date 10/2006)!<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The first note is that obviously the system, after the XP installation, keeps the Sneaky&#039;s drivers somewhere (where?). The second note is HOW is possible to install such a new driver to such an old video card? I want to add that the latest official driver with support for GeForce2 is 66.93 (10/2004). The official nVIDIA 93.71 drivers CANNOT be installed in a system with a GeForce2. So, I suppose that these Sneaky&#039;s drivers are modded, so that can be installed on almost every display card. Is that a fact? I didn&#039;t know that Bashrat is tweaking the drivers, I thought that he only put them all together. Thanks.</p><p>PS: I want to add that previously, I had tried with many other modded display drivers from Guru3d. I really wanted to update the driver for my old GeForce2 cards. The result? Nothing, every time the driver was causing a BSOD (nf4_disp.inf) at the end of the installation process. I tried in three systems and with two different GeForce2 cards. Now I am very happy with these Sneaky&#039;s drivers, which seem to be stable.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[harriscs]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.driverpacks.net/profile.php?id=2338</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-06-27T01:20:21Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.driverpacks.net/viewtopic.php?pid=12005#p12005</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
